From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: by sourceware.org (Postfix, from userid 48)
	id 1A73D385E00A; Tue, 30 Aug 2022 07:48:56 +0000 (GMT)
DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org 1A73D385E00A
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gcc.gnu.org;
	s=default; t=1661845736;
	bh=xtN0bdt2Nb4/HXNaRWno6XcsoJmmBw04ZpyzLbPgs9w=;
	h=From:To:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From;
	b=T/uLMlB+ofsiXJLMgq6ar+FhPU/p+NhDKU1wh8TT4CzQp5RbLiw5s9yU2OA7yelXd
	 U4nUJWKeZAnYFhk8sMx+D79DAC7gfXbP33zI7jqoFdwDQgcYbJmE6Jidh18gABlcwZ
	 hcg4e4/xKqkoXvXe1IfVkkgSu0omeuNX3LSSvXnk=
From: "rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug middle-end/63518] missing Wuninitialized warning independent of
 order of arguments
Date: Tue, 30 Aug 2022 07:48:55 +0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: middle-end
X-Bugzilla-Version: 4.7.4
X-Bugzilla-Keywords: diagnostic
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Status: RESOLVED
X-Bugzilla-Resolution: FIXED
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: ---
X-Bugzilla-Flags: 
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: bug_status cc resolution
Message-ID: <bug-63518-4-kjfYSyUhJq@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-63518-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-63518-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.sourceware.org>

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D63518

Richard Biener <rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|NEW                         |RESOLVED
                 CC|                            |rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
         Resolution|---                         |FIXED

--- Comment #5 from Richard Biener <rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
I think this works as intended, setTimeout (t) is not an uninitialized use =
of
't'.  But maybe I'm missing something ... please enlighten me and re-open if
you think I'm wrong.=