From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 7200 invoked by alias); 15 Nov 2014 08:29:05 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 7152 invoked by uid 48); 15 Nov 2014 08:29:01 -0000 From: "ubizjak at gmail dot com" To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug target/63527] [5 Regression] -fPIC uses 2 registers for GOT Date: Sat, 15 Nov 2014 08:29:00 -0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc X-Bugzilla-Component: target X-Bugzilla-Version: 5.0 X-Bugzilla-Keywords: missed-optimization, ra X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal X-Bugzilla-Who: ubizjak at gmail dot com X-Bugzilla-Status: NEW X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3 X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: 5.0 X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: cc Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 X-SW-Source: 2014-11/txt/msg01310.txt.bz2 https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D63527 Uro=C5=A1 Bizjak changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |ubizjak at gmail dot com --- Comment #3 from Uro=C5=A1 Bizjak --- Still happens with r217599. >>From gcc-bugs-return-466839-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org Sat Nov 15 08:39:25 2014 Return-Path: Delivered-To: listarch-gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 10315 invoked by alias); 15 Nov 2014 08:39:25 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org Delivered-To: mailing list gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 10279 invoked by uid 48); 15 Nov 2014 08:39:21 -0000 From: "mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org" To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug middle-end/63884] ICE: SIGSEGV in is_sec_implicit_index_fn with -fcilkplus and __builtin_sadd_overflow() Date: Sat, 15 Nov 2014 08:39:00 -0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc X-Bugzilla-Component: middle-end X-Bugzilla-Version: 5.0 X-Bugzilla-Keywords: ice-on-valid-code X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal X-Bugzilla-Who: mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Status: ASSIGNED X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3 X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: 5.0 X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: bug_status assigned_to Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 X-SW-Source: 2014-11/txt/msg01311.txt.bz2 Content-length: 571 https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63884 Marek Polacek changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #2 from Marek Polacek --- It's just that the Cilk code isn't prepared for internal functions, which have NULL CALL_EXPR_FN. I'll prepare a patch.