public inbox for gcc-bugs@sourceware.org
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* [Bug c++/63540] New: Erroneous "'Derived' declares a move constructor or move assignment operator" in error.
@ 2014-10-15 2:31 brooks at gcc dot gnu.org
2014-10-15 9:23 ` [Bug c++/63540] " redi at gcc dot gnu.org
2015-04-27 15:57 ` danregister at poczta dot fm
0 siblings, 2 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: brooks at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2014-10-15 2:31 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63540
Bug ID: 63540
Summary: Erroneous "'Derived' declares a move constructor or
move assignment operator" in error.
Product: gcc
Version: 4.9.2
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: c++
Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
Reporter: brooks at gcc dot gnu.org
Consider the following reduced testcase:
----
template <typename T, typename = decltype(*static_cast<T*>(0) = 0)> int
break_it();
template <typename> int break_it();
struct Base {
Base(const Base &);
void operator=(Base &&);
};
struct Derived : Base {
using Base::operator=;
};
int a = break_it<Derived>();
Derived v(v);
----
With a recent 4.9, it fails with an erroneous error:
----
$ gcc-archive/4.9/215880/bin/g++ --std=gnu++11 t.cc -c -o t.o
t.cc:13:12: error: use of deleted function ‘Derived::Derived(const Derived&)’
Derived v(v);
^
t.cc:8:8: note: ‘Derived::Derived(const Derived&)’ is implicitly declared as
deleted because ‘Derived’ declares a move constructor or move assignment
operator
struct Derived : Base {
^
----
The same erroneous error occurs on trunk.
The call to 'Derived::operator=' in a SFINAE context within break_it seems to
be confusing GCC about which special members Derived declares.
>From gcc-bugs-return-464088-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org Wed Oct 15 02:42:22 2014
Return-Path: <gcc-bugs-return-464088-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Delivered-To: listarch-gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 16664 invoked by alias); 15 Oct 2014 02:42:21 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org
Delivered-To: mailing list gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 16636 invoked by uid 48); 15 Oct 2014 02:42:18 -0000
From: "ppluzhnikov at google dot com" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug c++/63540] Erroneous "'Derived' declares a move constructor or move assignment operator" in error.
Date: Wed, 15 Oct 2014 02:42:00 -0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: c++
X-Bugzilla-Version: 4.9.2
X-Bugzilla-Keywords:
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: ppluzhnikov at google dot com
X-Bugzilla-Status: UNCONFIRMED
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: ---
X-Bugzilla-Flags:
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: cc
Message-ID: <bug-63540-4-2lAHN3JPa0@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-63540-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-63540-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-SW-Source: 2014-10/txt/msg01109.txt.bz2
Content-length: 418
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?idc540
Paul Pluzhnikov <ppluzhnikov at google dot com> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
CC| |ppluzhnikov at google dot com
--- Comment #1 from Paul Pluzhnikov <ppluzhnikov at google dot com> ---
Google ref: b/17785687
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
* [Bug c++/63540] Erroneous "'Derived' declares a move constructor or move assignment operator" in error.
2014-10-15 2:31 [Bug c++/63540] New: Erroneous "'Derived' declares a move constructor or move assignment operator" in error brooks at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2014-10-15 9:23 ` redi at gcc dot gnu.org
2015-04-27 15:57 ` danregister at poczta dot fm
1 sibling, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: redi at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2014-10-15 9:23 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63540
Jonathan Wakely <redi at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Keywords| |rejects-valid
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed| |2014-10-15
Ever confirmed|0 |1
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
* [Bug c++/63540] Erroneous "'Derived' declares a move constructor or move assignment operator" in error.
2014-10-15 2:31 [Bug c++/63540] New: Erroneous "'Derived' declares a move constructor or move assignment operator" in error brooks at gcc dot gnu.org
2014-10-15 9:23 ` [Bug c++/63540] " redi at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2015-04-27 15:57 ` danregister at poczta dot fm
1 sibling, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: danregister at poczta dot fm @ 2015-04-27 15:57 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63540
Daniel Adamski <danregister at poczta dot fm> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
CC| |danregister at poczta dot fm
--- Comment #2 from Daniel Adamski <danregister at poczta dot fm> ---
I have another variant of that issue:
----------------------------------------------------------------
struct Base
{
Base() {}
Base(const Base &) {}
Base & operator=(Base &&) { return *this; }
};
struct D1 : Base
{
using Base::operator=;
D1 & operator=(const D1&) { return *this; }
};
int main()
{
D1 x;
D1 y = x;
(void) y;
}
----------------------------------------------------------------
The error:
----------------------------------------------------------------
test.cpp: In function ‘int main()’:
test.cpp:19:12: error: use of deleted function ‘D1::D1(const D1&)’
D1 y = x;
^
test.cpp:10:8: note: ‘D1::D1(const D1&)’ is implicitly declared as deleted
because ‘D1’ declares a move constructor or move assignment operator
struct D1 : Base
----------------------------------------------------------------
It's enough to remove one of the lines (any one) from D1 for the error to go
away.
Yet another variant:
----------------------------------------------------------------
struct Base
{
Base() {}
Base(const Base &) {}
Base & operator=(Base &&) { return *this; }
};
struct D1 : Base
{
using Base::operator=;
};
struct D2 : D1
{
D2 & operator=(const D2 &) { return *this; }
};
int main()
{
D1 x;
D1 y = x;
(void) y;
}
----------------------------------------------------------------
The error is the same. The "operator=()" in "D2" doesn't have to be D2's
assignment operator. It may some other "operator()", e.g., "operator(int)" or
it may be "using D1::operator=;" or "using Base::operator=;"
>From gcc-bugs-return-484753-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org Mon Apr 27 16:03:46 2015
Return-Path: <gcc-bugs-return-484753-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Delivered-To: listarch-gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 77671 invoked by alias); 27 Apr 2015 16:03:46 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org
Delivered-To: mailing list gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 77627 invoked by uid 48); 27 Apr 2015 16:03:42 -0000
From: "mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug c/65901] no warning or error for va_arg (ap, void)
Date: Mon, 27 Apr 2015 16:03:00 -0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: c
X-Bugzilla-Version: 6.0
X-Bugzilla-Keywords:
X-Bugzilla-Severity: minor
X-Bugzilla-Who: mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Status: NEW
X-Bugzilla-Resolution:
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: 6.0
X-Bugzilla-Flags:
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: bug_status cf_reconfirmed_on cc target_milestone everconfirmed
Message-ID: <bug-65901-4-pWcK7CStvf@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-65901-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-65901-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-SW-Source: 2015-04/txt/msg02305.txt.bz2
Content-length: 676
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?ide901
Marek Polacek <mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed| |2015-04-27
CC| |mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org
Target Milestone|--- |6.0
Ever confirmed|0 |1
--- Comment #1 from Marek Polacek <mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
We should probably reject such a program. G++/clang reject that as well.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2015-04-27 15:57 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2014-10-15 2:31 [Bug c++/63540] New: Erroneous "'Derived' declares a move constructor or move assignment operator" in error brooks at gcc dot gnu.org
2014-10-15 9:23 ` [Bug c++/63540] " redi at gcc dot gnu.org
2015-04-27 15:57 ` danregister at poczta dot fm
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).