From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: by sourceware.org (Postfix, from userid 48)
	id CEF1D3882053; Thu, 13 Jun 2024 09:24:05 +0000 (GMT)
DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org CEF1D3882053
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gcc.gnu.org;
	s=default; t=1718270645;
	bh=qXbIRiqsUx/p3OY/KMHYI91YwXO5csPeS8fsIG0QgP4=;
	h=From:To:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From;
	b=uqy0ISUJk35CSFls+X/tMI4aUCGO7dIoil6wH0tSoBuRYFgk8NVuS4q0u8Ktp/yuX
	 u7pig3cpwGJZNQWj/N7ZW8MVPcMl8brpinbl7gGX6xNfTi4z0BqQiPPGEltFul+nYJ
	 ORXAWDTT8hvKarQYT/kNmZq/YjFmuQTXrBDAWGFc=
From: "xry111 at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug middle-end/63556] gcc should dedup string postfixes
Date: Thu, 13 Jun 2024 09:24:05 +0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: middle-end
X-Bugzilla-Version: 4.9.2
X-Bugzilla-Keywords: missed-optimization
X-Bugzilla-Severity: enhancement
X-Bugzilla-Who: xry111 at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Status: RESOLVED
X-Bugzilla-Resolution: WONTFIX
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: ---
X-Bugzilla-Flags: 
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: bug_status resolution
Message-ID: <bug-63556-4-HSlnVOjABm@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-63556-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-63556-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.sourceware.org>

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D63556

Xi Ruoyao <xry111 at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|REOPENED                    |RESOLVED
         Resolution|---                         |WONTFIX

--- Comment #5 from Xi Ruoyao <xry111 at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
Sorry somehow changed the wrong bug.  I don't really understand the rule of
bugzilla for jumping into another bug when I changed one...=