public inbox for gcc-bugs@sourceware.org
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug target/63596] New: Saving of GPR/FPRs for stdarg even though the variable argument is not used
Date: Sun, 19 Oct 2014 18:59:00 -0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <bug-63596-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/> (raw)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63596

            Bug ID: 63596
           Summary: Saving of GPR/FPRs for stdarg even though the variable
                    argument is not used
           Product: gcc
           Version: 4.9.0
            Status: UNCONFIRMED
          Severity: normal
          Priority: P3
         Component: target
          Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
          Reporter: pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org
            Target: aarch64

Take a function like:
int f(int a, ...)
{
  return a;
}

Currently with the top of the trunk we get:
f:
    sub    sp, sp, #192
    stp    x1, x2, [sp, 136]
    stp    x3, x4, [sp, 152]
    stp    x5, x6, [sp, 168]
    str    x7, [sp, 184]
    str    q0, [sp]
    str    q1, [sp, 16]
    str    q2, [sp, 32]
    str    q3, [sp, 48]
    str    q4, [sp, 64]
    str    q5, [sp, 80]
    str    q6, [sp, 96]
    str    q7, [sp, 112]
    add    sp, sp, 192
    ret
--- CUT ---
But we can optimize this down to just 
f:
    ret
--- CUT ---
The .stdarg debug dump says:
f: va_list escapes 0, needs to save 0 GPR units and 0 FPR units.

But nowhere in aarch64.c uses cfun->va_list_gpr_size or cfun->va_list_fpr_size
to figure out how many registers need to be saved.


             reply	other threads:[~2014-10-19 18:53 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2014-10-19 18:59 pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org [this message]
2014-10-20 12:51 ` [Bug target/63596] " rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
2014-12-30 17:00 ` jiwang at gcc dot gnu.org
2014-12-30 18:24 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org
2015-01-03 22:01 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org
2015-01-06 18:26 ` jiwang at gcc dot gnu.org

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=bug-63596-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ \
    --to=gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org \
    --cc=gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).