From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 21139 invoked by alias); 22 Oct 2014 14:15:44 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 21104 invoked by uid 48); 22 Oct 2014 14:15:39 -0000 From: "kyukhin at gcc dot gnu.org" To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug target/63600] [5 Regression] ice in ix86_expand_sse2_abs Date: Wed, 22 Oct 2014 14:23:00 -0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc X-Bugzilla-Component: target X-Bugzilla-Version: 5.0 X-Bugzilla-Keywords: X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal X-Bugzilla-Who: kyukhin at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Status: NEW X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3 X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: 5.0 X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 X-SW-Source: 2014-10/txt/msg01681.txt.bz2 https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63600 --- Comment #4 from Kirill Yukhin --- (In reply to Jakub Jelinek from comment #3) > I would have expected VI instead of IV in the iterator name, but I never > understood the rules for i?86 iterator names. > And, you want the testcase in the testsuite too. Agh, right! Thanks. I'll post patch w/ renamed iterator and a testcase (from this bug)