public inbox for gcc-bugs@sourceware.org
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "jakub at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug rtl-optimization/63637] [4.9/5 Regression] CSE on x86 asm()-s no longer working due to PR/60663 fix
Date: Fri, 23 Jan 2015 19:56:00 -0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <bug-63637-4-LWDzTpw2KC@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <bug-63637-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63637

--- Comment #2 from Jakub Jelinek <jakub at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
Author: jakub
Date: Fri Jan 23 19:55:16 2015
New Revision: 220059

URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=220059&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
    PR rtl-optimization/63637
    PR rtl-optimization/60663
    * cse.c (merge_equiv_classes): Set new_elt->cost to MAX_COST
    if elt->cost is MAX_COST for ASM_OPERANDS.
    (find_sets_in_insn): Fix up comment typo.
    (cse_insn): Don't set src_volatile for all non-volatile
    ASM_OPERANDS in PARALLELs, but just those with multiple outputs
    or with "memory" clobber.  Set elt->cost to MAX_COST
    for ASM_OPERANDS in PARALLEL.  Set src_elt->cost to MAX_COST
    if new_src is ASM_OPERANDS and elt->cost is MAX_COST.

    * gcc.dg/pr63637-1.c: New test.
    * gcc.dg/pr63637-2.c: New test.
    * gcc.dg/pr63637-3.c: New test.
    * gcc.dg/pr63637-4.c: New test.
    * gcc.dg/pr63637-5.c: New test.
    * gcc.dg/pr63637-6.c: New test.
    * gcc.target/i386/pr63637-1.c: New test.
    * gcc.target/i386/pr63637-2.c: New test.
    * gcc.target/i386/pr63637-3.c: New test.
    * gcc.target/i386/pr63637-4.c: New test.
    * gcc.target/i386/pr63637-5.c: New test.
    * gcc.target/i386/pr63637-6.c: New test.

Added:
    trunk/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/pr63637-1.c
    trunk/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/pr63637-2.c
    trunk/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/pr63637-3.c
    trunk/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/pr63637-4.c
    trunk/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/pr63637-5.c
    trunk/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/pr63637-6.c
    trunk/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/i386/pr63637-1.c
    trunk/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/i386/pr63637-2.c
    trunk/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/i386/pr63637-3.c
    trunk/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/i386/pr63637-4.c
    trunk/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/i386/pr63637-5.c
    trunk/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/i386/pr63637-6.c
Modified:
    trunk/gcc/ChangeLog
    trunk/gcc/cse.c
    trunk/gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog


  parent reply	other threads:[~2015-01-23 19:56 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2014-10-24 11:44 [Bug rtl-optimization/63637] New: CSE() " jbeulich at novell dot com
2014-12-17  8:19 ` [Bug rtl-optimization/63637] [4.9/5 Regression] CSE " jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
2015-01-13 13:00 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
2015-01-23 19:56 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org [this message]
2015-01-23 20:09 ` [Bug rtl-optimization/63637] [4.9 " jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
2015-02-01 17:33 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
2015-02-01 22:00 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=bug-63637-4-LWDzTpw2KC@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ \
    --to=gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org \
    --cc=gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).