public inbox for gcc-bugs@sourceware.org help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "jakub at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org> To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug rtl-optimization/63637] [4.9/5 Regression] CSE on x86 asm()-s no longer working due to PR/60663 fix Date: Fri, 23 Jan 2015 19:56:00 -0000 [thread overview] Message-ID: <bug-63637-4-LWDzTpw2KC@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/> (raw) In-Reply-To: <bug-63637-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63637 --- Comment #2 from Jakub Jelinek <jakub at gcc dot gnu.org> --- Author: jakub Date: Fri Jan 23 19:55:16 2015 New Revision: 220059 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=220059&root=gcc&view=rev Log: PR rtl-optimization/63637 PR rtl-optimization/60663 * cse.c (merge_equiv_classes): Set new_elt->cost to MAX_COST if elt->cost is MAX_COST for ASM_OPERANDS. (find_sets_in_insn): Fix up comment typo. (cse_insn): Don't set src_volatile for all non-volatile ASM_OPERANDS in PARALLELs, but just those with multiple outputs or with "memory" clobber. Set elt->cost to MAX_COST for ASM_OPERANDS in PARALLEL. Set src_elt->cost to MAX_COST if new_src is ASM_OPERANDS and elt->cost is MAX_COST. * gcc.dg/pr63637-1.c: New test. * gcc.dg/pr63637-2.c: New test. * gcc.dg/pr63637-3.c: New test. * gcc.dg/pr63637-4.c: New test. * gcc.dg/pr63637-5.c: New test. * gcc.dg/pr63637-6.c: New test. * gcc.target/i386/pr63637-1.c: New test. * gcc.target/i386/pr63637-2.c: New test. * gcc.target/i386/pr63637-3.c: New test. * gcc.target/i386/pr63637-4.c: New test. * gcc.target/i386/pr63637-5.c: New test. * gcc.target/i386/pr63637-6.c: New test. Added: trunk/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/pr63637-1.c trunk/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/pr63637-2.c trunk/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/pr63637-3.c trunk/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/pr63637-4.c trunk/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/pr63637-5.c trunk/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/pr63637-6.c trunk/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/i386/pr63637-1.c trunk/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/i386/pr63637-2.c trunk/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/i386/pr63637-3.c trunk/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/i386/pr63637-4.c trunk/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/i386/pr63637-5.c trunk/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/i386/pr63637-6.c Modified: trunk/gcc/ChangeLog trunk/gcc/cse.c trunk/gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-01-23 19:56 UTC|newest] Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top 2014-10-24 11:44 [Bug rtl-optimization/63637] New: CSE() " jbeulich at novell dot com 2014-12-17 8:19 ` [Bug rtl-optimization/63637] [4.9/5 Regression] CSE " jakub at gcc dot gnu.org 2015-01-13 13:00 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org 2015-01-23 19:56 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org [this message] 2015-01-23 20:09 ` [Bug rtl-optimization/63637] [4.9 " jakub at gcc dot gnu.org 2015-02-01 17:33 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org 2015-02-01 22:00 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
Reply instructions: You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email using any one of the following methods: * Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client, and reply-to-all from there: mbox Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style * Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to switches of git-send-email(1): git send-email \ --in-reply-to=bug-63637-4-LWDzTpw2KC@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ \ --to=gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org \ --cc=gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org \ /path/to/YOUR_REPLY https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html * If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header via mailto: links, try the mailto: linkBe sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox; as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).