public inbox for gcc-bugs@sourceware.org help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "iains at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org> To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug target/63651] Lot of failures in obj(c|-c++) with yosemite Date: Mon, 22 Dec 2014 10:18:00 -0000 [thread overview] Message-ID: <bug-63651-4-o0CaGwQPJI@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/> (raw) In-Reply-To: <bug-63651-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63651 --- Comment #14 from Iain Sandoe <iains at gcc dot gnu.org> --- Created attachment 34310 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=34310&action=edit Arrange for the instancetype type to be recognised This makes "instancetype" a synonym for "id". So, in round terms it should work as expected - however: (a) there's nothing to prevent the User from using it in the Wrong Place (i.e. somewhere other than a return type). (b) there's none of the additional analysis that instancetype allows to provide greater type security. So it's part #1 of N that will be needed to implement this part of the modernisation. ==== NOTE that on my tests we still fail to parse the system headers owing to the use of blocks (but that's a different, and bigger, problem).
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-12-22 10:18 UTC|newest] Thread overview: 17+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top [not found] <bug-63651-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/> 2014-11-01 11:52 ` fxcoudert at gcc dot gnu.org 2014-11-07 23:02 ` fxcoudert at gcc dot gnu.org 2014-11-08 13:45 ` dominiq at lps dot ens.fr 2014-11-08 13:53 ` fxcoudert at gcc dot gnu.org 2014-11-08 14:07 ` iains at gcc dot gnu.org 2014-11-08 14:09 ` howarth at bromo dot med.uc.edu 2014-11-08 14:22 ` howarth at bromo dot med.uc.edu 2014-11-20 19:27 ` egall at gwmail dot gwu.edu 2014-11-20 19:47 ` howarth at bromo dot med.uc.edu 2014-12-20 10:54 ` dominiq at lps dot ens.fr 2014-12-20 12:44 ` dominiq at lps dot ens.fr 2014-12-20 16:12 ` fxcoudert at gcc dot gnu.org 2014-12-20 16:18 ` iains at gcc dot gnu.org 2014-12-22 10:18 ` iains at gcc dot gnu.org [this message] 2014-12-22 14:17 ` dominiq at lps dot ens.fr 2014-12-22 21:29 ` mrs at gcc dot gnu.org 2014-12-22 21:49 ` iains at gcc dot gnu.org
Reply instructions: You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email using any one of the following methods: * Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client, and reply-to-all from there: mbox Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style * Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to switches of git-send-email(1): git send-email \ --in-reply-to=bug-63651-4-o0CaGwQPJI@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ \ --to=gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org \ --cc=gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org \ /path/to/YOUR_REPLY https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html * If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header via mailto: links, try the mailto: linkBe sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox; as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).