public inbox for gcc-bugs@sourceware.org help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org> To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug target/63679] [5 Regression][AArch64] Failure to constant fold. Date: Mon, 09 Feb 2015 09:08:00 -0000 [thread overview] Message-ID: <bug-63679-4-xLD6MNeVRW@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/> (raw) In-Reply-To: <bug-63679-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63679 Richard Biener <rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Priority|P3 |P2 --- Comment #25 from Richard Biener <rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org> --- No, aarch64 still commits the initializer to memory so the patch doesn't help it for the testcase in the end. It still improves things a bit. I'm quite sure we can't fix this in a target independent way for GCC 5, thus the only chance is to make aarch64 not commit the initializer to memory. That is also the real regression (aarch64 changed to commit the initializer to memory). aarch64 is secondary target only thus this missed-optimization shouldn't block the release.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-02-09 9:08 UTC|newest] Thread overview: 36+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top [not found] <bug-63679-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/> 2014-10-30 10:04 ` [Bug target/63679] [5.0 " belagod at gcc dot gnu.org 2014-10-30 10:10 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org 2014-11-04 11:41 ` belagod at gcc dot gnu.org 2014-11-04 16:32 ` belagod at gcc dot gnu.org 2014-11-04 20:58 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org 2014-11-20 12:44 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org 2014-11-20 16:21 ` belagod at gcc dot gnu.org 2014-11-20 16:49 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org 2014-11-21 8:48 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org 2014-11-21 10:17 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org 2014-11-21 10:26 ` belagod at gcc dot gnu.org 2014-11-21 10:36 ` rguenther at suse dot de 2014-11-21 10:54 ` belagod at gcc dot gnu.org 2014-11-21 11:25 ` jgreenhalgh at gcc dot gnu.org 2014-11-21 18:20 ` jgreenhalgh at gcc dot gnu.org 2014-11-24 8:52 ` rguenther at suse dot de 2014-11-24 11:16 ` belagod at gcc dot gnu.org 2014-11-24 11:31 ` rguenther at suse dot de 2014-11-24 12:01 ` jgreenhalgh at gcc dot gnu.org 2014-11-24 12:19 ` rguenther at suse dot de 2014-11-24 13:45 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org 2014-11-24 13:45 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org 2014-11-24 14:07 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org 2015-02-07 10:55 ` [Bug target/63679] [5 " jakub at gcc dot gnu.org 2015-02-09 9:08 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org [this message] 2015-02-09 10:10 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org 2015-02-09 12:20 ` belagod at gcc dot gnu.org 2015-02-09 13:17 ` rguenther at suse dot de 2015-02-09 13:34 ` belagod at gcc dot gnu.org 2015-03-12 16:53 ` [Bug target/63679] [5 / 6 " ramana at gcc dot gnu.org 2015-07-28 17:15 ` [Bug target/63679] [5/6 " alalaw01 at gcc dot gnu.org 2015-07-28 18:36 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org 2015-07-29 7:23 ` rguenther at suse dot de 2015-07-29 17:50 ` alalaw01 at gcc dot gnu.org 2015-08-03 15:38 ` alalaw01 at gcc dot gnu.org 2015-08-04 9:30 ` rguenther at suse dot de
Reply instructions: You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email using any one of the following methods: * Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client, and reply-to-all from there: mbox Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style * Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to switches of git-send-email(1): git send-email \ --in-reply-to=bug-63679-4-xLD6MNeVRW@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ \ --to=gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org \ --cc=gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org \ /path/to/YOUR_REPLY https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html * If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header via mailto: links, try the mailto: linkBe sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox; as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).