From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-bugs-return-465763-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: (qmail 11995 invoked by alias); 5 Nov 2014 08:46:01 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 11965 invoked by uid 48); 5 Nov 2014 08:45:58 -0000
From: "roger.ferrer at bsc dot es" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug fortran/63744] New: Duplicate use-statement causes error
Date: Wed, 05 Nov 2014 08:46:00 -0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: new
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: fortran
X-Bugzilla-Version: 4.9.1
X-Bugzilla-Keywords:
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: roger.ferrer at bsc dot es
X-Bugzilla-Status: UNCONFIRMED
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: ---
X-Bugzilla-Flags:
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: bug_id short_desc product version bug_status bug_severity priority component assigned_to reporter
Message-ID: <bug-63744-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-SW-Source: 2014-11/txt/msg00235.txt.bz2

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63744

            Bug ID: 63744
           Summary: Duplicate use-statement causes error
           Product: gcc
           Version: 4.9.1
            Status: UNCONFIRMED
          Severity: normal
          Priority: P3
         Component: fortran
          Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
          Reporter: roger.ferrer at bsc dot es

Hi,

(I guess this is related to PR34657)

The following snippet is accepted by gfortran

-- test-ok.f90
MODULE MOO
    INTEGER :: S
END MODULE MOO

SUBROUTINE S1
    USE MOO, ONLY: X => S, X => S

    X = 1
END SUBROUTINE S1
-- end of test-ok.f90

but it is rejected if the program unit SUBROUTINE S1 is renamed to SUBROUTINE
S,
as shown below

-- test.f90
MODULE MOO
    INTEGER :: S
END MODULE MOO

SUBROUTINE S
    USE MOO, ONLY: X => S, X => S

    X = 1
END SUBROUTINE S
-- end of test.f90

$ gfortran -c test.f90
test.f90:6.8:

    USE MOO, ONLY: X => S, X => S
        1
Error: 's' of module 'moo', imported at (1), is also the name of the current
program unit
test.f90:8.5:

    X = 1
     1
Error: Name 'x' at (1) is an ambiguous reference to 's' from module 'moo'

Removing the second rename lets the code be accepted.

  USE MOO, ONLY: X => S

A similar behaviour is observed if we have two repeated USE-statements rather
than two repeated rename's in the rename-list

  USE MOO, ONLY: X => S
  USE MOO, ONLY: X => S

Kind regards,