From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 26514 invoked by alias); 18 Nov 2014 14:51:56 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 26471 invoked by uid 48); 18 Nov 2014 14:51:52 -0000 From: "rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org" To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug middle-end/63790] [5 Regression] Tests XFAILed because of the match-and-simplify merge Date: Tue, 18 Nov 2014 14:51:00 -0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc X-Bugzilla-Component: middle-end X-Bugzilla-Version: 5.0 X-Bugzilla-Keywords: xfail X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal X-Bugzilla-Who: rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Status: ASSIGNED X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3 X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: 5.0 X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: cc Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 X-SW-Source: 2014-11/txt/msg01693.txt.bz2 https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63790 Richard Biener changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |mliska at suse dot cz --- Comment #8 from Richard Biener --- (In reply to Francois-Xavier Coudert from comment #5) > With -O2 -fno-ipa-icf, the expected error shows up. With only -O2, it does > not. > I attach the 088t.dom1 dump for both cases. Interesting that IPA-ICF doesn't catch the opportunity on x86_64 ... Martin? Ah, it seems we unify it but still inline it twice while on dawrin we unify it but do not inline it (but CSE one call later). But yes, adding -fno-ipa-icf to dg-options is fine with me (and pre-approved).