public inbox for gcc-bugs@sourceware.org
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "larryv at macports dot org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug target/63810] gcc sets incorrect macro for OS X deployment targets
Date: Fri, 14 Nov 2014 09:16:00 -0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <bug-63810-4-gL0YPgkfpb@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <bug-63810-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63810

--- Comment #4 from Lawrence Velázquez <larryv at macports dot org> ---
Created attachment 33969
  --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=33969&action=edit
patch against 4.9 branch for handling deployment targets correctly

Patched GCC 4.9.2 matched the behavior of Apple LLVM Compiler 6.0
(clang-600.0.54) over 8,451 out of 8,464 test strings. The 13 mismatches are
due to a bug in clang.
>From gcc-bugs-return-466728-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org Fri Nov 14 09:18:44 2014
Return-Path: <gcc-bugs-return-466728-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Delivered-To: listarch-gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 12239 invoked by alias); 14 Nov 2014 09:18:44 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org
Delivered-To: mailing list gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 12195 invoked by uid 48); 14 Nov 2014 09:18:41 -0000
From: "larryv at macports dot org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug target/63810] gcc sets incorrect macro for OS X deployment targets
Date: Fri, 14 Nov 2014 09:18:00 -0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: target
X-Bugzilla-Version: 5.0
X-Bugzilla-Keywords:
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: larryv at macports dot org
X-Bugzilla-Status: NEW
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: ---
X-Bugzilla-Flags:
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: attachments.created
Message-ID: <bug-63810-4-rUMO4OR8qD@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-63810-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-63810-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-SW-Source: 2014-11/txt/msg01200.txt.bz2
Content-length: 371

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63810

--- Comment #5 from Lawrence Velázquez <larryv at macports dot org> ---
Created attachment 33970
  --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=33970&action=edit
patch against 4.8 branch for handling deployment targets correctly

This patch incorporates and supersedes attachment 33932 from bug 61407.
>From gcc-bugs-return-466729-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org Fri Nov 14 09:21:44 2014
Return-Path: <gcc-bugs-return-466729-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Delivered-To: listarch-gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 15274 invoked by alias); 14 Nov 2014 09:21:44 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org
Delivered-To: mailing list gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 15224 invoked by uid 48); 14 Nov 2014 09:21:37 -0000
From: "rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug c/63862] New: C frontend converts shift-count to int while standard wants integer promotions
Date: Fri, 14 Nov 2014 09:21:00 -0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: new
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: c
X-Bugzilla-Version: 5.0
X-Bugzilla-Keywords:
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Status: UNCONFIRMED
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: ---
X-Bugzilla-Flags:
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: bug_id short_desc product version bug_status bug_severity priority component assigned_to reporter cc
Message-ID: <bug-63862-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-SW-Source: 2014-11/txt/msg01201.txt.bz2
Content-length: 1312

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?idc862

            Bug ID: 63862
           Summary: C frontend converts shift-count to int while standard
                    wants integer promotions
           Product: gcc
           Version: 5.0
            Status: UNCONFIRMED
          Severity: normal
          Priority: P3
         Component: c
          Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
          Reporter: rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
                CC: jsm28 at gcc dot gnu.org

/* Convert the non vector shift-count to an integer, regardless
             of size of value being shifted.  */
          if (TREE_CODE (TREE_TYPE (op1)) != VECTOR_TYPE
              && TYPE_MAIN_VARIANT (TREE_TYPE (op1)) != integer_type_node)
            op1 = convert (integer_type_node, op1);

while C99 6.5.7 says "The integer promotions are performed on each of the
operands".

The above pessimizes gcc.c-torture/execute/shiftopt-1.c which does

void
utest (unsigned int x)
{
  if (-1 >> x != -1)
    link_error ();
}

and thus expects us to know that the shift amount is nonnegative.  But
with the C frontend generating -1 >> (int)x we don't know that anymore
(and thus if I fix the bogus fold-const.c code which strips sign-changing
conversions on x before asking tree_expr_nonnegative_p it fails to optimize).


  parent reply	other threads:[~2014-11-14  9:16 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2014-11-11  2:00 [Bug driver/63810] New: " jeremyhu at macports dot org
2014-11-11  7:38 ` [Bug target/63810] " fxcoudert at gcc dot gnu.org
2014-11-14  9:09 ` larryv at macports dot org
2014-11-14  9:16 ` larryv at macports dot org [this message]
2014-11-14 21:21 ` howarth at bromo dot med.uc.edu
2014-11-14 21:24 ` larryv at macports dot org
2014-11-14 21:59 ` larryv at macports dot org
2014-11-18  6:40 ` larryv at macports dot org
2014-11-18  7:31 ` larryv at macports dot org
2014-11-18  9:32 ` fxcoudert at gcc dot gnu.org
2014-12-22 22:42 ` egall at gwmail dot gwu.edu
2015-05-15  6:54 ` vq at larryv dot me
2015-05-15 22:52 ` fxcoudert at gcc dot gnu.org
2015-05-16  2:16 ` vq at larryv dot me
2015-05-16  7:58 ` fxcoudert at gcc dot gnu.org
2015-05-20 22:01 ` vq at larryv dot me
2015-05-28 12:27 ` mrs at gcc dot gnu.org
2015-05-28 16:08 ` vq at larryv dot me

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=bug-63810-4-gL0YPgkfpb@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ \
    --to=gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org \
    --cc=gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).