public inbox for gcc-bugs@sourceware.org
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "jakub at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug target/63892] [5 Regression] gcc.dg/sibcall-3.c fails on darwin with -m32
Date: Fri, 20 Feb 2015 10:41:00 -0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <bug-63892-4-1pdNRXlyNm@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <bug-63892-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63892

--- Comment #5 from Jakub Jelinek <jakub at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
Created attachment 34815
  --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=34815&action=edit
gcc5-pr63892.patch

This untested patch fixes the issue too, though if the #c4 patch could be made
to work, it might be perhaps unnecessary because we would never try to add
thunks in between local functions.  Or is there any case where it would make
sense to add them rather than redirect callers?


  parent reply	other threads:[~2015-02-20 10:41 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 26+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2014-11-15 16:21 [Bug target/63892] New: [5.0 regression] " fxcoudert at gcc dot gnu.org
2014-11-15 16:22 ` [Bug target/63892] " fxcoudert at gcc dot gnu.org
2014-11-15 16:27 ` dominiq at lps dot ens.fr
2014-11-17  9:32 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
2014-12-10 15:28 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
2015-02-18 19:49 ` [Bug target/63892] [5 Regression] " law at redhat dot com
2015-02-20  9:32 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
2015-02-20 10:41 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org [this message]
2015-02-20 12:00 ` marxin at gcc dot gnu.org
2015-02-20 13:04 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
2015-02-20 16:50 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
2015-02-20 16:51 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
2015-02-21 12:51 ` dominiq at lps dot ens.fr
2015-02-21 13:29 ` iains at gcc dot gnu.org
2015-02-21 13:29 ` iains at gcc dot gnu.org
2015-02-21 14:47 ` iains at gcc dot gnu.org
2015-02-21 18:03 ` iains at gcc dot gnu.org
2015-02-22  4:59 ` iains at gcc dot gnu.org
2015-02-22 13:10 ` iains at gcc dot gnu.org
2015-02-22 16:55 ` iains at gcc dot gnu.org
2015-02-22 22:27 ` howarth at bromo dot med.uc.edu
2015-02-22 23:57 ` iains at gcc dot gnu.org
2015-02-23  8:45 ` iains at gcc dot gnu.org
2015-02-23 11:15 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
2015-02-23 11:15 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
2015-02-27  7:44 ` mrs at gcc dot gnu.org

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=bug-63892-4-1pdNRXlyNm@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ \
    --to=gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org \
    --cc=gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body. 
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).