public inbox for gcc-bugs@sourceware.org
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "anlauf at gmx dot de" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug libfortran/63930] libgfortran should use 'abort ()' instead of 'exit (2)' for run-time errors
Date: Sun, 05 Jul 2015 18:52:00 -0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <bug-63930-4-DoxYa3PaLh@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <bug-63930-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63930

Harald Anlauf <anlauf at gmx dot de> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
                 CC|                            |anlauf at gmx dot de

--- Comment #2 from Harald Anlauf <anlauf at gmx dot de> ---
I think that there is a fundamental need to rewrite the handling of
runtime errors in gfortran.  Since 4.7 I do often not get useful
backtraces with certain kinds of fatal errors like array-bounds
violation, see PR/53739.  I use the patch I suggested there in my
private installations, but this doesn't help my colleagues at work.

I think a fatal runtime error does not require a nice termination
of the program, including closing of files etc.
However, this might require a general review - and classification -
of runtime errors:

- fatal (illegal operations like bad pointers/addresses etc.)
- severe (e.g. failed ALLOCATE?)
- soft (e.g. "file not found" in an OPEN statement)

I'm not sure where I'd place floating point exceptions; their
severity might even be configurable.

(Note: I'm writing this as nobody seems to care about PR/53739).


  parent reply	other threads:[~2015-07-05 18:52 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2014-11-18 10:37 [Bug libfortran/63930] New: " ludo at gnu dot org
2015-07-05 12:41 ` [Bug libfortran/63930] " fxcoudert at gcc dot gnu.org
2015-07-05 18:52 ` anlauf at gmx dot de [this message]
2015-07-05 18:53 ` anlauf at gmx dot de
2015-07-05 20:01 ` kargl at gcc dot gnu.org
2015-09-04 22:09 ` fxcoudert at gcc dot gnu.org

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=bug-63930-4-DoxYa3PaLh@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ \
    --to=gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org \
    --cc=gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).