From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 32562 invoked by alias); 18 Nov 2014 10:57:06 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 32245 invoked by uid 48); 18 Nov 2014 10:57:02 -0000 From: "charlet at gcc dot gnu.org" To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug ada/63931] Ada libraries use 5.0 as LIB_VERSION Date: Tue, 18 Nov 2014 10:57:00 -0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc X-Bugzilla-Component: ada X-Bugzilla-Version: 5.0 X-Bugzilla-Keywords: X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal X-Bugzilla-Who: charlet at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Status: RESOLVED X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3 X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: --- X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: bug_status cc resolution Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 X-SW-Source: 2014-11/txt/msg01622.txt.bz2 https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63931 Arnaud Charlet changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED CC| |charlet at gcc dot gnu.org Resolution|--- |INVALID --- Comment #1 from Arnaud Charlet --- Not sure what you mean. Aren't you confusing minor and micro versions? We do want 5.0 like we had 4.9/4.8/4.7/... previously, so this looks as expected to me. And we'll want 5.1 once we've branched. In other words, we want to bump for each "major" release of GCC (really, each "minor" if you look at major.minor.micro). What we do not want is 5.0.0/5.0.1. Arno