From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 11249 invoked by alias); 21 Nov 2014 23:17:28 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 11156 invoked by uid 48); 21 Nov 2014 23:17:23 -0000 From: "dominiq at lps dot ens.fr" To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug sanitizer/63939] [5 Regression] Massive asan failures (356) on darwin Date: Fri, 21 Nov 2014 23:17:00 -0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc X-Bugzilla-Component: sanitizer X-Bugzilla-Version: 5.0 X-Bugzilla-Keywords: X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal X-Bugzilla-Who: dominiq at lps dot ens.fr X-Bugzilla-Status: RESOLVED X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3 X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: 5.0 X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 X-SW-Source: 2014-11/txt/msg02497.txt.bz2 https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63939 --- Comment #26 from Dominique d'Humieres --- The failures in comment 22 are due to r217769 and are now fixed at r217946, likely by r217853 (no interest to check it). Note for the record that the double spaces were due to r217518 (libsanitizer merge from upstream r221802). Is it worth to file a PR about the too fragile regexps in the asan tests?