From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 26060 invoked by alias); 19 Nov 2014 12:30:08 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 25984 invoked by uid 48); 19 Nov 2014 12:30:04 -0000 From: "fxcoudert at gcc dot gnu.org" To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug sanitizer/63939] [5 Regression] Massive asan failures (356) on darwin Date: Wed, 19 Nov 2014 12:30:00 -0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc X-Bugzilla-Component: sanitizer X-Bugzilla-Version: 5.0 X-Bugzilla-Keywords: X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal X-Bugzilla-Who: fxcoudert at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Status: NEW X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3 X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: 5.0 X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: cc component short_desc Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 X-SW-Source: 2014-11/txt/msg01865.txt.bz2 https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63939 Francois-Xavier Coudert changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |dodji at gcc dot gnu.org, | |dvyukov at gcc dot gnu.org, | |jakub at gcc dot gnu.org Component|testsuite |sanitizer Summary|[5 Regression] Massive asan |[5 Regression] Massive asan |failures (356) on |failures (356) on darwin |x86_64-apple-darwin14 | --- Comment #4 from Francois-Xavier Coudert --- The difference is that darwin doesn't give symbols associated with the backtrace (the "in main" part). This should be ultimately fixed in libbacktrace (see for example: https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc/2012-10/msg00053.html), because as I understand it it is libbacktrace that provides symbolization for libsanitizer. In the meantime, the testsuite requirements should be relaxed. The question for the sanitizer maintainers is: is Dominique's patch acceptable to achieve this?