From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 24049 invoked by alias); 19 Nov 2014 13:51:19 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 23585 invoked by uid 48); 19 Nov 2014 13:51:13 -0000 From: "fxcoudert at gcc dot gnu.org" To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug sanitizer/63939] [5 Regression] Massive asan failures (356) on darwin Date: Wed, 19 Nov 2014 13:51:00 -0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc X-Bugzilla-Component: sanitizer X-Bugzilla-Version: 5.0 X-Bugzilla-Keywords: X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal X-Bugzilla-Who: fxcoudert at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Status: NEW X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3 X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: 5.0 X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 X-SW-Source: 2014-11/txt/msg01931.txt.bz2 https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63939 --- Comment #9 from Francois-Xavier Coudert --- (In reply to Jakub Jelinek from comment #8) > No. libsanitizer is only supported on selected *-*-linux* targets, and > (apparently prematurely so) on x86_64-*-darwin* and i?86-*-darwin*. Fair enough, I didn't realize that. For a long time, libsanitizer broke bootstrap on darwin so I was used to build without it. An option is to have a recent llvm-symbolizer in one's PATH while running the testsuite. This brings the number of failures (make check-gcc RUNTESTFLAGS="asan.exp") down from 60 to 36. (I will investigate the remaining failures separately.)