From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 10032 invoked by alias); 19 Nov 2014 12:50:41 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 9955 invoked by uid 48); 19 Nov 2014 12:50:37 -0000 From: "jakub at gcc dot gnu.org" To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug sanitizer/63939] [5 Regression] Massive asan failures (356) on darwin Date: Wed, 19 Nov 2014 12:50:00 -0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc X-Bugzilla-Component: sanitizer X-Bugzilla-Version: 5.0 X-Bugzilla-Keywords: X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal X-Bugzilla-Who: jakub at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Status: NEW X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3 X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: 5.0 X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 X-SW-Source: 2014-11/txt/msg01873.txt.bz2 https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63939 --- Comment #8 from Jakub Jelinek --- (In reply to Francois-Xavier Coudert from comment #7) > It's not only a darwin issue: as libbacktrace's README says, "libbacktrace > only supports ELF executables with DWARF debugging information", so > obviously there are other object formats, Mach-O and PE-COFF at least, > possibly some other exotic object formats(?). > > So a generic solution still needs to be found. Disabling testing entirely, > while a large part of the functionality is present, seems like a bad idea. No. libsanitizer is only supported on selected *-*-linux* targets, and (apparently prematurely so) on x86_64-*-darwin* and i?86-*-darwin*. So no generic solution is needed, when somebody ports libsanitizer to some other target, he should make sure symbolization also works there.