From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-bugs-return-467619-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: (qmail 32093 invoked by alias); 19 Nov 2014 22:09:21 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 32042 invoked by uid 48); 19 Nov 2014 22:09:18 -0000
From: "jason at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug sanitizer/63956] [5 Regression][UBSAN] ICE segfault in cxx_eval_call_expression ../../gcc/cp/constexpr.c
Date: Wed, 19 Nov 2014 22:09:00 -0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: sanitizer
X-Bugzilla-Version: 5.0
X-Bugzilla-Keywords: ice-on-valid-code
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: jason at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Status: NEW
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: 5.0
X-Bugzilla-Flags:
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields:
Message-ID: <bug-63956-4-VIRbvYc2Fu@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-63956-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-63956-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-SW-Source: 2014-11/txt/msg02091.txt.bz2

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63956

--- Comment #4 from Jason Merrill <jason at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
(In reply to Jakub Jelinek from comment #3)
> Supposedly with the C++14 constexpr changes we need to be prepared to handle
> all the ubsan builtins and internal calls we create during genericization.

Hmm, maybe I should make a copy of the pre-genericization DECL_SAVED_TREE
instead...