public inbox for gcc-bugs@sourceware.org
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* [Bug sanitizer/63958] New: [5 Regression] bootstrap failure in the sanitizer libs on sparc-linux-gnu
@ 2014-11-19 11:51 doko at gcc dot gnu.org
2014-11-19 12:33 ` [Bug sanitizer/63958] " rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
` (11 more replies)
0 siblings, 12 replies; 13+ messages in thread
From: doko at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2014-11-19 11:51 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63958
Bug ID: 63958
Summary: [5 Regression] bootstrap failure in the sanitizer libs
on sparc-linux-gnu
Product: gcc
Version: unknown
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: sanitizer
Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
Reporter: doko at gcc dot gnu.org
CC: dodji at gcc dot gnu.org, dvyukov at gcc dot gnu.org,
jakub at gcc dot gnu.org, kcc at gcc dot gnu.org
seen with r217751 on the trunk
libtool: compile: /«PKGBUILDDIR»/build/./gcc/xgcc
-B/«PKGBUILDDIR»/build/./gcc/ -B/usr/lib/gcc-snapshot/sparc-linux-gnu/bin/
-B/usr/lib/gcc-snapshot/sparc-linux-gnu/lib/ -isystem
/usr/lib/gcc-snapshot/sparc-linux-gnu/include -isystem
/usr/lib/gcc-snapshot/sparc-linux-gnu/sys-include -DHAVE_CONFIG_H
-I../../../../src/libatomic/config/posix -I../../../../src/libatomic -I. -Wall
-Werror -pthread -g -O2 -m64 -MT init.lo -MD -MP -MF .deps/init.Tpo -c
../../../../src/libatomic/init.c -o init.o >/dev/null 2>&1
/«PKGBUILDDIR»/build/./gcc/xgcc -B/«PKGBUILDDIR»/build/./gcc/
-B/usr/lib/gcc-snapshot/sparc-linux-gnu/bin/
-B/usr/lib/gcc-snapshot/sparc-linux-gnu/lib/ -isystem
/usr/lib/gcc-snapshot/sparc-linux-gnu/include -isystem
/usr/lib/gcc-snapshot/sparc-linux-gnu/sys-include -c -g -O2 -fPIC -W -Wall
-gnatpg -nostdinc a-wwboio.adb -o a-wwboio.o
In file included from
../../../../src/libsanitizer/sanitizer_common/sanitizer_platform_limits_linux.cc:40:0:
/usr/include/sparc-linux-gnu/asm/stat.h:60:2: error: 'time_t' does not name a
type
time_t st_atime;
^
/usr/include/sparc-linux-gnu/asm/stat.h:62:2: error: 'time_t' does not name a
type
time_t st_mtime;
^
/usr/include/sparc-linux-gnu/asm/stat.h:64:2: error: 'time_t' does not name a
type
time_t st_ctime;
^
yes
In file included from
../../../../src/libsanitizer/sanitizer_common/sanitizer_platform_limits_linux.cc:20:0:
../../../../src/libsanitizer/sanitizer_common/sanitizer_platform_limits_linux.cc:64:78:
error: invalid application of 'sizeof' to incomplete type '__old_kernel_stat'
COMPILER_CHECK(struct___old_kernel_stat_sz == sizeof(struct
__old_kernel_stat));
^
../../../../src/libsanitizer/sanitizer_common/sanitizer_internal_defs.h:272:65:
note: in definition of macro 'IMPL_COMPILER_ASSERT'
typedef char IMPL_PASTE(assertion_failed_##_, line)[2*(int)(pred)-1]
^
../../../../src/libsanitizer/sanitizer_common/sanitizer_platform_limits_linux.cc:64:1:
note: in expansion of macro 'COMPILER_CHECK'
COMPILER_CHECK(struct___old_kernel_stat_sz == sizeof(struct
__old_kernel_stat));
^
../../../../src/libsanitizer/sanitizer_common/sanitizer_platform_limits_linux.cc:67:16:
error: 'struct_kernel_stat_sz' was not declared in this scope
COMPILER_CHECK(struct_kernel_stat_sz == sizeof(struct stat));
^
../../../../src/libsanitizer/sanitizer_common/sanitizer_internal_defs.h:272:65:
note: in definition of macro 'IMPL_COMPILER_ASSERT'
typedef char IMPL_PASTE(assertion_failed_##_, line)[2*(int)(pred)-1]
^
../../../../src/libsanitizer/sanitizer_common/sanitizer_platform_limits_linux.cc:67:1:
note: in expansion of macro 'COMPILER_CHECK'
COMPILER_CHECK(struct_kernel_stat_sz == sizeof(struct stat));
^
checking for getrlimit... Makefile:447: recipe for target
'sanitizer_platform_limits_linux.lo' failed
make[6]: *** [sanitizer_platform_limits_linux.lo] Error 1
make[6]: *** Waiting for unfinished jobs....
>From gcc-bugs-return-467385-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org Wed Nov 19 11:57:54 2014
Return-Path: <gcc-bugs-return-467385-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Delivered-To: listarch-gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 4205 invoked by alias); 19 Nov 2014 11:57:54 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org
Delivered-To: mailing list gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 4177 invoked by uid 48); 19 Nov 2014 11:57:50 -0000
From: "lh_mouse at 126 dot com" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug libstdc++/63959] New: G++ misreports volatile int as trivially copyable
Date: Wed, 19 Nov 2014 11:57:00 -0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: new
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: libstdc++
X-Bugzilla-Version: 5.0
X-Bugzilla-Keywords:
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: lh_mouse at 126 dot com
X-Bugzilla-Status: UNCONFIRMED
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: ---
X-Bugzilla-Flags:
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: bug_id short_desc product version bug_status bug_severity priority component assigned_to reporter
Message-ID: <bug-63959-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-SW-Source: 2014-11/txt/msg01857.txt.bz2
Content-length: 899
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?idc959
Bug ID: 63959
Summary: G++ misreports volatile int as trivially copyable
Product: gcc
Version: 5.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: libstdc++
Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
Reporter: lh_mouse at 126 dot com
The type trait std::is_trivially_copyable<volatile int>::value yields true on
g++ (GCC) 5.0.0 20141119 (experimental).
ISO C++ states that volatile types are NOT trivially copyable:
N3936 3.9 Types [basic.types]
9 Arithmetic types (3.9.1), ... Cv-unqualified scalar types, trivially copyable
class types (Clause 9), arrays of such types,
** and nonvolatile const-qualified versions of these types (3.9.3) **
are collectively called trivially copyable types. ...
So this is a bug. Please fix.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 13+ messages in thread
* [Bug sanitizer/63958] [5 Regression] bootstrap failure in the sanitizer libs on sparc-linux-gnu
2014-11-19 11:51 [Bug sanitizer/63958] New: [5 Regression] bootstrap failure in the sanitizer libs on sparc-linux-gnu doko at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2014-11-19 12:33 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
2014-11-19 19:26 ` kcc at gcc dot gnu.org
` (10 subsequent siblings)
11 siblings, 0 replies; 13+ messages in thread
From: rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2014-11-19 12:33 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63958
Richard Biener <rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Version|unknown |5.0
Target Milestone|--- |5.0
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 13+ messages in thread
* [Bug sanitizer/63958] [5 Regression] bootstrap failure in the sanitizer libs on sparc-linux-gnu
2014-11-19 11:51 [Bug sanitizer/63958] New: [5 Regression] bootstrap failure in the sanitizer libs on sparc-linux-gnu doko at gcc dot gnu.org
2014-11-19 12:33 ` [Bug sanitizer/63958] " rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2014-11-19 19:26 ` kcc at gcc dot gnu.org
2014-11-19 21:20 ` kcc at gcc dot gnu.org
` (9 subsequent siblings)
11 siblings, 0 replies; 13+ messages in thread
From: kcc at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2014-11-19 19:26 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63958
--- Comment #1 from Kostya Serebryany <kcc at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
Please send patches upstream:
https://code.google.com/p/address-sanitizer/wiki/HowToContribute
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 13+ messages in thread
* [Bug sanitizer/63958] [5 Regression] bootstrap failure in the sanitizer libs on sparc-linux-gnu
2014-11-19 11:51 [Bug sanitizer/63958] New: [5 Regression] bootstrap failure in the sanitizer libs on sparc-linux-gnu doko at gcc dot gnu.org
2014-11-19 12:33 ` [Bug sanitizer/63958] " rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
2014-11-19 19:26 ` kcc at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2014-11-19 21:20 ` kcc at gcc dot gnu.org
2014-11-19 22:13 ` davem at gcc dot gnu.org
` (8 subsequent siblings)
11 siblings, 0 replies; 13+ messages in thread
From: kcc at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2014-11-19 21:20 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63958
--- Comment #3 from Kostya Serebryany <kcc at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
I am very sorry that you are so upset, but the workflow will not change.
All changes to sanitizer files (except for GCC-specific tests and make files)
have to go to upstream first.
If any change goes directly to GCC it will get overwritten by a following merge
from upstream.
(merge is the wrong name for process actually. The right name would be "copy").
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 13+ messages in thread
* [Bug sanitizer/63958] [5 Regression] bootstrap failure in the sanitizer libs on sparc-linux-gnu
2014-11-19 11:51 [Bug sanitizer/63958] New: [5 Regression] bootstrap failure in the sanitizer libs on sparc-linux-gnu doko at gcc dot gnu.org
` (2 preceding siblings ...)
2014-11-19 21:20 ` kcc at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2014-11-19 22:13 ` davem at gcc dot gnu.org
2014-11-19 22:25 ` kcc at gcc dot gnu.org
` (7 subsequent siblings)
11 siblings, 0 replies; 13+ messages in thread
From: davem at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2014-11-19 22:13 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63958
--- Comment #4 from davem at gcc dot gnu.org ---
You cannot have it both ways.
If you demand people go through upstream, you have to be responsive to fixing
build failures yourselves. Because it is the sanitizer developers who
introduced this build failure that stood for 9 months in a release of gcc.
This current situation is completely unacceptable, and if you are going to get
into a commit war with me when I am simply trying to fix the build which you
both broke and refused to fix for 9+ months, that's extremely anti-social and
demonstrates how the current situation is not working and is bad for gcc
development overall.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 13+ messages in thread
* [Bug sanitizer/63958] [5 Regression] bootstrap failure in the sanitizer libs on sparc-linux-gnu
2014-11-19 11:51 [Bug sanitizer/63958] New: [5 Regression] bootstrap failure in the sanitizer libs on sparc-linux-gnu doko at gcc dot gnu.org
` (3 preceding siblings ...)
2014-11-19 22:13 ` davem at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2014-11-19 22:25 ` kcc at gcc dot gnu.org
2014-12-10 15:30 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
` (6 subsequent siblings)
11 siblings, 0 replies; 13+ messages in thread
From: kcc at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2014-11-19 22:25 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63958
--- Comment #6 from Kostya Serebryany <kcc at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
I am not at war with anyone and if I am, I give up and surrender.
But whoever wants the sanitizers to work on SPARC [s]he will have to work with
us upstream. We can not fix build failures on SPARC upstream because we don't
have access to SPARC machines and there is no public buildbot with SPARC.
If no one needs sanitizers on SPARC and all you care about is that GCC builds
on SPARC, just disable the sanitizers for SPARC.
This is my last response here.
For constructive discussion please start sending patches upstream.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 13+ messages in thread
* [Bug sanitizer/63958] [5 Regression] bootstrap failure in the sanitizer libs on sparc-linux-gnu
2014-11-19 11:51 [Bug sanitizer/63958] New: [5 Regression] bootstrap failure in the sanitizer libs on sparc-linux-gnu doko at gcc dot gnu.org
` (4 preceding siblings ...)
2014-11-19 22:25 ` kcc at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2014-12-10 15:30 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
2015-02-24 11:22 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
` (5 subsequent siblings)
11 siblings, 0 replies; 13+ messages in thread
From: rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2014-12-10 15:30 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63958
Richard Biener <rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING
Last reconfirmed| |2014-12-10
Ever confirmed|0 |1
--- Comment #7 from Richard Biener <rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
Does it work again?
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 13+ messages in thread
* [Bug sanitizer/63958] [5 Regression] bootstrap failure in the sanitizer libs on sparc-linux-gnu
2014-11-19 11:51 [Bug sanitizer/63958] New: [5 Regression] bootstrap failure in the sanitizer libs on sparc-linux-gnu doko at gcc dot gnu.org
` (5 preceding siblings ...)
2014-12-10 15:30 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2015-02-24 11:22 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
2015-02-26 9:41 ` doko at gcc dot gnu.org
` (4 subsequent siblings)
11 siblings, 0 replies; 13+ messages in thread
From: jakub at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2015-02-24 11:22 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63958
Jakub Jelinek <jakub at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
CC| |doko at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #9 from Jakub Jelinek <jakub at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
Matthias, do you still build Debian and/or Ubuntu for SPARC and could you check
this?
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 13+ messages in thread
* [Bug sanitizer/63958] [5 Regression] bootstrap failure in the sanitizer libs on sparc-linux-gnu
2014-11-19 11:51 [Bug sanitizer/63958] New: [5 Regression] bootstrap failure in the sanitizer libs on sparc-linux-gnu doko at gcc dot gnu.org
` (6 preceding siblings ...)
2015-02-24 11:22 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2015-02-26 9:41 ` doko at gcc dot gnu.org
2015-03-09 18:26 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
` (3 subsequent siblings)
11 siblings, 0 replies; 13+ messages in thread
From: doko at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2015-02-26 9:41 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63958
Matthias Klose <doko at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|WAITING |NEW
--- Comment #10 from Matthias Klose <doko at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
yes, still applies, and the build passed the libsanitizer directory.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 13+ messages in thread
* [Bug sanitizer/63958] [5 Regression] bootstrap failure in the sanitizer libs on sparc-linux-gnu
2014-11-19 11:51 [Bug sanitizer/63958] New: [5 Regression] bootstrap failure in the sanitizer libs on sparc-linux-gnu doko at gcc dot gnu.org
` (7 preceding siblings ...)
2015-02-26 9:41 ` doko at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2015-03-09 18:26 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
2015-03-09 19:05 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
` (2 subsequent siblings)
11 siblings, 0 replies; 13+ messages in thread
From: jakub at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2015-03-09 18:26 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63958
--- Comment #11 from Jakub Jelinek <jakub at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
Author: jakub
Date: Mon Mar 9 18:25:28 2015
New Revision: 221283
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=221283&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR sanitizer/63958
Reapply:
2014-10-14 David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
* sanitizer_common/sanitizer_platform_limits_linux.cc (time_t):
Define at __kernel_time_t, as needed for sparc.
(struct __old_kernel_stat): Don't check if __sparc__ is defined.
* libsanitizer/sanitizer_common/sanitizer_platform_limits_posix.h
(__sanitizer): Define struct___old_kernel_stat_sz,
struct_kernel_stat_sz, and struct_kernel_stat64_sz for sparc.
(__sanitizer_ipc_perm): Adjust for sparc targets.
(__sanitizer_shmid_ds): Likewsie.
(__sanitizer_sigaction): Likewise.
(IOC_SIZE): Likewsie.
Modified:
trunk/libsanitizer/ChangeLog
trunk/libsanitizer/sanitizer_common/sanitizer_platform_limits_linux.cc
trunk/libsanitizer/sanitizer_common/sanitizer_platform_limits_posix.h
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 13+ messages in thread
* [Bug sanitizer/63958] [5 Regression] bootstrap failure in the sanitizer libs on sparc-linux-gnu
2014-11-19 11:51 [Bug sanitizer/63958] New: [5 Regression] bootstrap failure in the sanitizer libs on sparc-linux-gnu doko at gcc dot gnu.org
` (8 preceding siblings ...)
2015-03-09 18:26 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2015-03-09 19:05 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
2015-03-09 19:26 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
2015-10-21 7:45 ` chefmax at gcc dot gnu.org
11 siblings, 0 replies; 13+ messages in thread
From: jakub at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2015-03-09 19:05 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63958
--- Comment #12 from Jakub Jelinek <jakub at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
Fixed for GCC 5 now, but the problem will likely reappear during next merge :(.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 13+ messages in thread
* [Bug sanitizer/63958] [5 Regression] bootstrap failure in the sanitizer libs on sparc-linux-gnu
2014-11-19 11:51 [Bug sanitizer/63958] New: [5 Regression] bootstrap failure in the sanitizer libs on sparc-linux-gnu doko at gcc dot gnu.org
` (9 preceding siblings ...)
2015-03-09 19:05 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2015-03-09 19:26 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
2015-10-21 7:45 ` chefmax at gcc dot gnu.org
11 siblings, 0 replies; 13+ messages in thread
From: jakub at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2015-03-09 19:26 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63958
Jakub Jelinek <jakub at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|--- |FIXED
--- Comment #13 from Jakub Jelinek <jakub at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 13+ messages in thread
* [Bug sanitizer/63958] [5 Regression] bootstrap failure in the sanitizer libs on sparc-linux-gnu
2014-11-19 11:51 [Bug sanitizer/63958] New: [5 Regression] bootstrap failure in the sanitizer libs on sparc-linux-gnu doko at gcc dot gnu.org
` (10 preceding siblings ...)
2015-03-09 19:26 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2015-10-21 7:45 ` chefmax at gcc dot gnu.org
11 siblings, 0 replies; 13+ messages in thread
From: chefmax at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2015-10-21 7:45 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63958
--- Comment #14 from Maxim Ostapenko <chefmax at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
Author: chefmax
Date: Wed Oct 21 07:44:35 2015
New Revision: 229113
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=229113&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
libsanitizer/
PR sanitizer/63958
Reapply:
2014-10-14 David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
* sanitizer_common/sanitizer_platform_limits_linux.cc (time_t):
Define at __kernel_time_t, as needed for sparc.
(struct __old_kernel_stat): Don't check if __sparc__ is defined.
* libsanitizer/sanitizer_common/sanitizer_platform_limits_posix.h
(__sanitizer): Define struct___old_kernel_stat_sz,
struct_kernel_stat_sz, and struct_kernel_stat64_sz for sparc.
(__sanitizer_ipc_perm): Adjust for sparc targets.
(__sanitizer_shmid_ds): Likewsie.
(__sanitizer_sigaction): Likewise.
(IOC_SIZE): Likewsie.
Modified:
trunk/libsanitizer/ChangeLog
trunk/libsanitizer/sanitizer_common/sanitizer_platform_limits_linux.cc
trunk/libsanitizer/sanitizer_common/sanitizer_platform_limits_posix.h
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 13+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2015-10-21 7:45 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 13+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2014-11-19 11:51 [Bug sanitizer/63958] New: [5 Regression] bootstrap failure in the sanitizer libs on sparc-linux-gnu doko at gcc dot gnu.org
2014-11-19 12:33 ` [Bug sanitizer/63958] " rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
2014-11-19 19:26 ` kcc at gcc dot gnu.org
2014-11-19 21:20 ` kcc at gcc dot gnu.org
2014-11-19 22:13 ` davem at gcc dot gnu.org
2014-11-19 22:25 ` kcc at gcc dot gnu.org
2014-12-10 15:30 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
2015-02-24 11:22 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
2015-02-26 9:41 ` doko at gcc dot gnu.org
2015-03-09 18:26 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
2015-03-09 19:05 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
2015-03-09 19:26 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
2015-10-21 7:45 ` chefmax at gcc dot gnu.org
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).