From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-bugs-return-467597-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: (qmail 15818 invoked by alias); 19 Nov 2014 20:31:50 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 15733 invoked by uid 48); 19 Nov 2014 20:31:46 -0000
From: "hubicka at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug middle-end/63967] [5 Regression] r217633 caused internal compiler error: in estimate_edge_growth, at ipa-inline.h:299
Date: Wed, 19 Nov 2014 20:31:00 -0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: middle-end
X-Bugzilla-Version: 5.0
X-Bugzilla-Keywords:
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: hubicka at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Status: NEW
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: 5.0
X-Bugzilla-Flags:
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: cc dependson
Message-ID: <bug-63967-4-ZI0UsQb9Ty@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-63967-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-63967-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-SW-Source: 2014-11/txt/msg02069.txt.bz2

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63967

Jan Hubicka <hubicka at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
                 CC|                            |hubicka at gcc dot gnu.org
         Depends on|                            |63470

--- Comment #2 from Jan Hubicka <hubicka at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
Quite possibly. r217633 does not change anything in inliner, so it looks like
semi-latent bug in mainline got exposed.  I will look at PR63470 because it has
testcase...