public inbox for gcc-bugs@sourceware.org
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "hubicka at ucw dot cz" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug ipa/63967] [5 Regression] r217633 caused internal compiler error: in estimate_edge_growth, at ipa-inline.h:299
Date: Mon, 12 Jan 2015 09:08:00 -0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <bug-63967-4-akmdiFXgFS@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <bug-63967-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63967
--- Comment #6 from Jan Hubicka <hubicka at ucw dot cz> ---
> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63967
>
> Uroš Bizjak <ubizjak at gmail dot com> changed:
>
> What |Removed |Added
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------------
> Status|WAITING |NEW
>
> --- Comment #5 from Uroš Bizjak <ubizjak at gmail dot com> ---
> (In reply to Jan Hubicka from comment #4)
> > Bug in PRPR63470 is C++ only. I however commited today another fix for this
> > ICE occuring with ICF and -fprofile-use. So I believe this bug should be
> > fixed. Can you, please, confirm it?
>
> The profiledbootstrap with r219444 still fails [1].
>
> [1] https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-regression/2015-01/msg00182.html
Have patch for that ICE too (profiledbootstrap running, will comit it once it
finishes)
Honza
>From gcc-bugs-return-472753-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org Mon Jan 12 09:08:24 2015
Return-Path: <gcc-bugs-return-472753-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Delivered-To: listarch-gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 21393 invoked by alias); 12 Jan 2015 09:08:24 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org
Delivered-To: mailing list gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 21359 invoked by uid 48); 12 Jan 2015 09:08:19 -0000
From: "marxin at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug ipa/64550] [5 Regression] IPA fixes cause ICE in tree-ssa.c:939
Date: Mon, 12 Jan 2015 09:08:00 -0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: ipa
X-Bugzilla-Version: 5.0
X-Bugzilla-Keywords:
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: marxin at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Status: WAITING
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: marxin at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: 5.0
X-Bugzilla-Flags:
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields:
Message-ID: <bug-64550-4-GyI515gwvF@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-64550-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-64550-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-SW-Source: 2015-01/txt/msg00747.txt.bz2
Content-length: 731
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64550
--- Comment #7 from Martin Liška <marxin at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
(In reply to Martin Liška from comment #6)
> Author: marxin
> Date: Mon Jan 12 09:02:33 2015
> New Revision: 219449
>
> URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=219449&root=gcc&view=rev
> Log:
> PR ipa/64550
>
> PR ipa/64551
> PR ipa/64552
> * ipa-icf.c (sem_function::equals_private): Use '&&' instead of
> '||' to fix typo issue.
>
> * gcc/tree.h (target_opts_for_fn): Check NULL_TREE since it can
> accept and return NULL.
>
>
> Modified:
> trunk/gcc/ChangeLog
> trunk/gcc/ipa-icf.c
> trunk/gcc/tree.h
Wrong PR link, this revision does not fix this issue.
>From gcc-bugs-return-472755-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org Mon Jan 12 09:12:28 2015
Return-Path: <gcc-bugs-return-472755-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Delivered-To: listarch-gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 28051 invoked by alias); 12 Jan 2015 09:12:27 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org
Delivered-To: mailing list gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 27998 invoked by uid 48); 12 Jan 2015 09:12:22 -0000
From: "marxin at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug target/64377] nios2 compile error in options-save.c
Date: Mon, 12 Jan 2015 09:12:00 -0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: target
X-Bugzilla-Version: 5.0
X-Bugzilla-Keywords: build
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: marxin at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Status: NEW
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: ---
X-Bugzilla-Flags:
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: cc
Message-ID: <bug-64377-4-mVZ2vcwsqV@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-64377-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-64377-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-SW-Source: 2015-01/txt/msg00749.txt.bz2
Content-length: 567
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64377
Martin Liška <marxin at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
CC| |marxin at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #7 from Martin Liška <marxin at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
Hello.
There's suggested patch [1], may I ask someone from nios2 community for testing
the patch?
[1] https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2015-01/msg00465.html
Thanks,
Martin
>From gcc-bugs-return-472756-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org Mon Jan 12 09:15:44 2015
Return-Path: <gcc-bugs-return-472756-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Delivered-To: listarch-gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 31333 invoked by alias); 12 Jan 2015 09:15:43 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org
Delivered-To: mailing list gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 31285 invoked by uid 48); 12 Jan 2015 09:15:39 -0000
From: "ubizjak at gmail dot com" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug lto/64374] [5.0 regression] LTO ICE in extract_insn, at recog.c:2327
Date: Mon, 12 Jan 2015 09:15:00 -0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: lto
X-Bugzilla-Version: 5.0
X-Bugzilla-Keywords:
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: ubizjak at gmail dot com
X-Bugzilla-Status: UNCONFIRMED
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: 5.0
X-Bugzilla-Flags:
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: cc
Message-ID: <bug-64374-4-PVl0PmB6yb@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-64374-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-64374-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-SW-Source: 2015-01/txt/msg00750.txt.bz2
Content-length: 468
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64374
Uroš Bizjak <ubizjak at gmail dot com> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
CC| |jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #5 from Uroš Bizjak <ubizjak at gmail dot com> ---
Similar to PR64412, it looks to me that this PR needs similar treatment.
Adding CC.
>From gcc-bugs-return-472757-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org Mon Jan 12 09:24:31 2015
Return-Path: <gcc-bugs-return-472757-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Delivered-To: listarch-gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 3472 invoked by alias); 12 Jan 2015 09:24:30 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org
Delivered-To: mailing list gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 3405 invoked by uid 48); 12 Jan 2015 09:24:26 -0000
From: "jakub at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug lto/64374] [5.0 regression] LTO ICE in extract_insn, at recog.c:2327
Date: Mon, 12 Jan 2015 09:24:00 -0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: lto
X-Bugzilla-Version: 5.0
X-Bugzilla-Keywords:
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Status: UNCONFIRMED
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: 5.0
X-Bugzilla-Flags:
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields:
Message-ID: <bug-64374-4-y2QXObyCc5@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-64374-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-64374-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-SW-Source: 2015-01/txt/msg00751.txt.bz2
Content-length: 584
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?idd374
--- Comment #6 from Jakub Jelinek <jakub at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
It can't have the same resolution though, that PR was resolved by not streaming
the target nodes at all for offloading. In this case there is no offloading.
If flag_pic is recorded somewhere in target node (where, x86_isa_flags,
somewhere else?), then supposedly during LTO reading that should be updated
from global flag_pic. I think it doesn't make sense to have flag_pic only in
some routines and not in others, so flag_pic should be treated as a global
flag.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-01-12 9:08 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <bug-63967-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
2014-11-19 15:51 ` [Bug middle-end/63967] " Joost.VandeVondele at mat dot ethz.ch
2014-11-19 18:39 ` hjl.tools at gmail dot com
2014-11-19 20:31 ` hubicka at gcc dot gnu.org
2014-12-10 15:31 ` [Bug ipa/63967] " rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
2015-01-12 8:39 ` hubicka at gcc dot gnu.org
2015-01-12 9:08 ` hubicka at ucw dot cz [this message]
2015-01-12 9:29 ` hubicka at gcc dot gnu.org
2015-01-12 17:22 ` hjl.tools at gmail dot com
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=bug-63967-4-akmdiFXgFS@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ \
--to=gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org \
--cc=gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).