public inbox for gcc-bugs@sourceware.org help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* [Bug testsuite/63971] New: Some of gcc.target/aarch64/test_frame_*.c tests fail now
@ 2014-11-19 17:22 pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org
2014-11-22 23:42 ` [Bug testsuite/63971] " pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org
` (6 more replies)
0 siblings, 7 replies; 8+ messages in thread
From: pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2014-11-19 17:22 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63971
Bug ID: 63971
Summary: Some of gcc.target/aarch64/test_frame_*.c tests fail
now
Product: gcc
Version: 5.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: testsuite
Assignee: pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org
Reporter: pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org
Target: aarch64
FAIL: gcc.target/aarch64/test_frame_1.c scan-assembler-times ldr\tx30,
\\[sp\\], [0-9]+ 3
FAIL: gcc.target/aarch64/test_frame_2.c scan-assembler-times ldp\tx19, x30,
\\[sp\\], [0-9]+ 2
FAIL: gcc.target/aarch64/test_frame_4.c scan-assembler-times ldp\tx19, x30,
\\[sp\\], [0-9]+ 2
FAIL: gcc.target/aarch64/test_frame_6.c scan-assembler-times ldr\tx30,
\\[sp\\], [0-9]+ 3
FAIL: gcc.target/aarch64/test_frame_7.c scan-assembler-times ldp\tx19, x30,
\\[sp\\], [0-9]+ 2
These fail due to ccmp improvements which remove the need to duplicate the ret.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread* [Bug testsuite/63971] Some of gcc.target/aarch64/test_frame_*.c tests fail now 2014-11-19 17:22 [Bug testsuite/63971] New: Some of gcc.target/aarch64/test_frame_*.c tests fail now pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2014-11-22 23:42 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org 2015-01-09 16:59 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org ` (5 subsequent siblings) 6 siblings, 0 replies; 8+ messages in thread From: pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2014-11-22 23:42 UTC (permalink / raw) To: gcc-bugs https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63971 --- Comment #2 from Andrew Pinski <pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org> --- Author: pinskia Date: Sat Nov 22 23:41:26 2014 New Revision: 217975 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=217975&root=gcc&view=rev Log: 2014-11-22 Andrew Pinski <apinski@cavium.com> PR target/63971 * gcc.target/aarch64/test_frame_1.c: Expect only two loads of x30 (in the epilogue). * gcc.target/aarch64/test_frame_6.c: Likewise. * gcc.target/aarch64/test_frame_2.c: Expect only one pair load of x30 and x19 (in the epilogue). * gcc.target/aarch64/test_frame_4.c: Likewise. * gcc.target/aarch64/test_frame_7.c: Likewise. Modified: trunk/gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog trunk/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/aarch64/test_frame_1.c trunk/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/aarch64/test_frame_2.c trunk/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/aarch64/test_frame_4.c trunk/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/aarch64/test_frame_6.c trunk/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/aarch64/test_frame_7.c ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread
* [Bug testsuite/63971] Some of gcc.target/aarch64/test_frame_*.c tests fail now 2014-11-19 17:22 [Bug testsuite/63971] New: Some of gcc.target/aarch64/test_frame_*.c tests fail now pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org 2014-11-22 23:42 ` [Bug testsuite/63971] " pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2015-01-09 16:59 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org 2015-01-15 18:18 ` belagod at gcc dot gnu.org ` (4 subsequent siblings) 6 siblings, 0 replies; 8+ messages in thread From: pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2015-01-09 16:59 UTC (permalink / raw) To: gcc-bugs https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63971 --- Comment #5 from Andrew Pinski <pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org> --- (In reply to Tejas Belagod from comment #4) > It looks like this still fails on trunk. That is because the conditional compares patch was reverted but my patch was not. Just revert my patch for the testsuite. ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread
* [Bug testsuite/63971] Some of gcc.target/aarch64/test_frame_*.c tests fail now 2014-11-19 17:22 [Bug testsuite/63971] New: Some of gcc.target/aarch64/test_frame_*.c tests fail now pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org 2014-11-22 23:42 ` [Bug testsuite/63971] " pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org 2015-01-09 16:59 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2015-01-15 18:18 ` belagod at gcc dot gnu.org 2015-01-15 18:19 ` belagod at gcc dot gnu.org ` (3 subsequent siblings) 6 siblings, 0 replies; 8+ messages in thread From: belagod at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2015-01-15 18:18 UTC (permalink / raw) To: gcc-bugs https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63971 --- Comment #6 from Tejas Belagod <belagod at gcc dot gnu.org> --- Author: belagod Date: Thu Jan 15 18:17:23 2015 New Revision: 219674 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=219674&root=gcc&view=rev Log: 2015-01-15 Tejas Belagod <tejas.belagod@arm.com> PR target/63971 * gcc.target/aarch64/test_frame_1.c: Revert to 3 loads of x30 in epilogue. * gcc.target/aarch64/test_frame_6.c: Likewise. * gcc.target/aarch64/test_frame_2.c: Revert to 2 pair loads of x30 and x19 (in the epilogue). * gcc.target/aarch64/test_frame_4.c: Likewise. * gcc.target/aarch64/test_frame_7.c: Likewise. Modified: trunk/gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog trunk/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/aarch64/test_frame_1.c trunk/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/aarch64/test_frame_2.c trunk/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/aarch64/test_frame_4.c trunk/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/aarch64/test_frame_6.c trunk/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/aarch64/test_frame_7.c ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread
* [Bug testsuite/63971] Some of gcc.target/aarch64/test_frame_*.c tests fail now 2014-11-19 17:22 [Bug testsuite/63971] New: Some of gcc.target/aarch64/test_frame_*.c tests fail now pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org ` (2 preceding siblings ...) 2015-01-15 18:18 ` belagod at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2015-01-15 18:19 ` belagod at gcc dot gnu.org 2015-01-19 8:49 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org ` (2 subsequent siblings) 6 siblings, 0 replies; 8+ messages in thread From: belagod at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2015-01-15 18:19 UTC (permalink / raw) To: gcc-bugs https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63971 Tejas Belagod <belagod at gcc dot gnu.org> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|REOPENED |RESOLVED Resolution|--- |FIXED --- Comment #7 from Tejas Belagod <belagod at gcc dot gnu.org> --- Fixed. ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread
* [Bug testsuite/63971] Some of gcc.target/aarch64/test_frame_*.c tests fail now 2014-11-19 17:22 [Bug testsuite/63971] New: Some of gcc.target/aarch64/test_frame_*.c tests fail now pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org ` (3 preceding siblings ...) 2015-01-15 18:19 ` belagod at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2015-01-19 8:49 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org 2015-01-19 12:58 ` belagod at gcc dot gnu.org 2015-10-29 23:22 ` mshawcroft at gcc dot gnu.org 6 siblings, 0 replies; 8+ messages in thread From: pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2015-01-19 8:49 UTC (permalink / raw) To: gcc-bugs https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63971 Andrew Pinski <pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|RESOLVED |UNCONFIRMED Resolution|FIXED |--- Ever confirmed|1 |0 --- Comment #8 from Andrew Pinski <pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org> --- And now they fail again. We need to add back the patch since conditional compares optimization is now in. This was one of the reasons why I did not revert my patch in the first place because I knew it would be back in for GCC 5. ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread
* [Bug testsuite/63971] Some of gcc.target/aarch64/test_frame_*.c tests fail now 2014-11-19 17:22 [Bug testsuite/63971] New: Some of gcc.target/aarch64/test_frame_*.c tests fail now pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org ` (4 preceding siblings ...) 2015-01-19 8:49 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2015-01-19 12:58 ` belagod at gcc dot gnu.org 2015-10-29 23:22 ` mshawcroft at gcc dot gnu.org 6 siblings, 0 replies; 8+ messages in thread From: belagod at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2015-01-19 12:58 UTC (permalink / raw) To: gcc-bugs https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63971 --- Comment #9 from Tejas Belagod <belagod at gcc dot gnu.org> --- Author: belagod Date: Mon Jan 19 12:57:48 2015 New Revision: 219838 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=219838&root=gcc&view=rev Log: 2015-01-19 Tejas Belagod <tejas.belagod@arm.com> PR target/63971 * gcc.target/aarch64/test_frame_1.c: Expect only two loads of x30 (in the epilogue). * gcc.target/aarch64/test_frame_6.c: Likewise. * gcc.target/aarch64/test_frame_2.c: Expect only one pair load of x30 and x19 (in the epilogue). * gcc.target/aarch64/test_frame_4.c: Likewise. * gcc.target/aarch64/test_frame_7.c: Likewise. Modified: trunk/gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog trunk/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/aarch64/test_frame_1.c trunk/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/aarch64/test_frame_2.c trunk/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/aarch64/test_frame_4.c trunk/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/aarch64/test_frame_6.c trunk/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/aarch64/test_frame_7.c ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread
* [Bug testsuite/63971] Some of gcc.target/aarch64/test_frame_*.c tests fail now 2014-11-19 17:22 [Bug testsuite/63971] New: Some of gcc.target/aarch64/test_frame_*.c tests fail now pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org ` (5 preceding siblings ...) 2015-01-19 12:58 ` belagod at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2015-10-29 23:22 ` mshawcroft at gcc dot gnu.org 6 siblings, 0 replies; 8+ messages in thread From: mshawcroft at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2015-10-29 23:22 UTC (permalink / raw) To: gcc-bugs https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63971 mshawcroft at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED CC| |mshawcroft at gcc dot gnu.org Resolution|--- |FIXED --- Comment #10 from mshawcroft at gcc dot gnu.org --- Fixed by Tejas ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2015-10-29 23:22 UTC | newest] Thread overview: 8+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed) -- links below jump to the message on this page -- 2014-11-19 17:22 [Bug testsuite/63971] New: Some of gcc.target/aarch64/test_frame_*.c tests fail now pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org 2014-11-22 23:42 ` [Bug testsuite/63971] " pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org 2015-01-09 16:59 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org 2015-01-15 18:18 ` belagod at gcc dot gnu.org 2015-01-15 18:19 ` belagod at gcc dot gnu.org 2015-01-19 8:49 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org 2015-01-19 12:58 ` belagod at gcc dot gnu.org 2015-10-29 23:22 ` mshawcroft at gcc dot gnu.org
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox; as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).