From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 4557 invoked by alias); 11 Dec 2014 22:33:39 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 4474 invoked by uid 48); 11 Dec 2014 22:33:33 -0000 From: "pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org" To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug target/63975] some of the builtin-arith-overflow* fail on aarch64 Date: Thu, 11 Dec 2014 22:33:00 -0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc X-Bugzilla-Component: target X-Bugzilla-Version: 5.0 X-Bugzilla-Keywords: X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal X-Bugzilla-Who: pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Status: REOPENED X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3 X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: --- X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 X-SW-Source: 2014-12/txt/msg01343.txt.bz2 https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63975 --- Comment #5 from Andrew Pinski --- (In reply to Tejas Belagod from comment #4) > aarch64-none-elf-gcc -fno-diagnostics-show-caret -fdiagnostics-color=never > -O2 -fdump-tree-optimized -g -specs=aem-ve.specs -lm -mcmodel=small > /work/dev/arm/src/gcc/gcc/testsuite/c-c++-common/torture/builtin-arith- > overflow-10.c -fPIC -o ba.exe > > aarch64-none-elf-gcc -fno-diagnostics-show-caret -fdiagnostics-color=never > -O2 -fdump-tree-optimized -g -specs=aem-ve.specs -lm -mcmodel=small > /work/dev/arm/src/gcc/gcc/testsuite/c-c++-common/torture/builtin-arith- > overflow-11.c -fPIC -o ba.exe > > aarch64-none-elf-gcc -fno-diagnostics-show-caret -fdiagnostics-color=never > -O2 -fdump-tree-optimized -g -specs=aem-ve.specs -lm -mcmodel=small > /work/dev/arm/src/gcc/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/builtin-arith-overflow-1.c -o > ba.exe -1.c was a bug in the testcase and has been fixed: https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2014-12/msg01049.html