From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 25027 invoked by alias); 20 Nov 2014 17:34:21 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 24968 invoked by uid 48); 20 Nov 2014 17:34:17 -0000 From: "iverbin at gmail dot com" To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug other/63979] [openacc] undefined reference to main._omp_fn.x Date: Thu, 20 Nov 2014 17:34:00 -0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc X-Bugzilla-Component: other X-Bugzilla-Version: unknown X-Bugzilla-Keywords: openacc X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal X-Bugzilla-Who: iverbin at gmail dot com X-Bugzilla-Status: UNCONFIRMED X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3 X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: --- X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 X-SW-Source: 2014-11/txt/msg02303.txt.bz2 https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63979 --- Comment #5 from Ilya Verbin --- (In reply to vries from comment #4) > But I think the main difference is that the offload table and main (using > the offload table) are now in the same partition. I don't know whether > that's by design or accident. What do you mean by "main (using the offload table)"? The design was to have the offload table in the first partition (number zero), and the table should be used only in libgomp through the GOMP_offload_register function.