From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 11583 invoked by alias); 25 Nov 2014 06:46:43 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 11529 invoked by uid 48); 25 Nov 2014 06:46:39 -0000 From: "olegendo at gcc dot gnu.org" To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug target/63986] [5 Regression][SH] gcc.target/sh/pr51244-15.c failures Date: Tue, 25 Nov 2014 06:46:00 -0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc X-Bugzilla-Component: target X-Bugzilla-Version: 5.0 X-Bugzilla-Keywords: missed-optimization X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal X-Bugzilla-Who: olegendo at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Status: NEW X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3 X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: 5.0 X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 X-SW-Source: 2014-11/txt/msg02936.txt.bz2 https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63986 --- Comment #11 from Oleg Endo --- (In reply to Oleg Endo from comment #10) > Author: olegendo > Date: Sat Nov 22 15:06:34 2014 > New Revision: 217968 > > URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=217968&root=gcc&view=rev Hm, I think the patch is missing some additional checks on the operands of the removed comparison insn, which might result in wrong code. Please leave this PR open for now.