From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 11316 invoked by alias); 21 Nov 2014 05:09:28 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 11267 invoked by uid 48); 21 Nov 2014 05:09:24 -0000 From: "kkojima at gcc dot gnu.org" To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug target/64008] [SH] sh4-linux configured compiler rejects -m4-nofpu Date: Fri, 21 Nov 2014 05:09:00 -0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc X-Bugzilla-Component: target X-Bugzilla-Version: 5.0 X-Bugzilla-Keywords: X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal X-Bugzilla-Who: kkojima at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Status: UNCONFIRMED X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3 X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: --- X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 X-SW-Source: 2014-11/txt/msg02351.txt.bz2 https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64008 --- Comment #1 from Kazumoto Kojima --- (In reply to Oleg Endo from comment #0) > Kaz, do you have any idea why these SUPPORT_SH* macros are needed? Why > isn't just every CPU/FPU type marked as supported? I have no idea for those macros. Some historical reason?