public inbox for gcc-bugs@sourceware.org
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* [Bug sanitizer/64013] New: [5 Regression] libsanitizer fails to build
@ 2014-11-21 8:43 rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
2014-11-21 8:43 ` [Bug sanitizer/64013] " rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
` (5 more replies)
0 siblings, 6 replies; 7+ messages in thread
From: rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2014-11-21 8:43 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64013
Bug ID: 64013
Summary: [5 Regression] libsanitizer fails to build
Product: gcc
Version: 5.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: sanitizer
Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
Reporter: rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
CC: dodji at gcc dot gnu.org, dvyukov at gcc dot gnu.org,
jakub at gcc dot gnu.org, kcc at gcc dot gnu.org
[35101s] I: Program returns random data in a function
[35101s] E: gcc5 no-return-in-nonvoid-function
../../../../libsanitizer/sanitizer_common/sanitizer_linux.cc:295
bool FileExists(const char *filename) {
#if SANITIZER_USES_CANONICAL_LINUX_SYSCALLS
struct stat st;
if (internal_syscall(SYSCALL(newfstatat), AT_FDCWD, filename, &st, 0))
return false;
#else
struct stat st;
if (internal_stat(filename, &st))
return false;
// Sanity check: filename is a regular file.
return S_ISREG(st.st_mode);
#endif
}
the SANITIZER_USES_CANONICAL_LINUX_SYSCALLS misses a return.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread
* [Bug sanitizer/64013] [5 Regression] libsanitizer fails to build
2014-11-21 8:43 [Bug sanitizer/64013] New: [5 Regression] libsanitizer fails to build rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2014-11-21 8:43 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
2014-11-21 8:47 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
` (4 subsequent siblings)
5 siblings, 0 replies; 7+ messages in thread
From: rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2014-11-21 8:43 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64013
Richard Biener <rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Priority|P3 |P1
Target Milestone|--- |5.0
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread
* [Bug sanitizer/64013] [5 Regression] libsanitizer fails to build
2014-11-21 8:43 [Bug sanitizer/64013] New: [5 Regression] libsanitizer fails to build rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
2014-11-21 8:43 ` [Bug sanitizer/64013] " rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2014-11-21 8:47 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
2014-11-21 13:46 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
` (3 subsequent siblings)
5 siblings, 0 replies; 7+ messages in thread
From: rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2014-11-21 8:47 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64013
--- Comment #1 from Richard Biener <rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
Note the message is from our package build process scanning for severe warnings
and failing package build because of that. Thus there is a "no return in
non-void function" warning generated by GCC during the build of libsanitizer,
in the particular case on aarch64-linux.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread
* [Bug sanitizer/64013] [5 Regression] libsanitizer fails to build
2014-11-21 8:43 [Bug sanitizer/64013] New: [5 Regression] libsanitizer fails to build rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
2014-11-21 8:43 ` [Bug sanitizer/64013] " rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
2014-11-21 8:47 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2014-11-21 13:46 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
2014-11-21 13:56 ` dvyukov at google dot com
` (2 subsequent siblings)
5 siblings, 0 replies; 7+ messages in thread
From: jakub at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2014-11-21 13:46 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64013
Jakub Jelinek <jakub at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed| |2014-11-21
Ever confirmed|0 |1
--- Comment #2 from Jakub Jelinek <jakub at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
Kostya/Dmitri, can you please fix this upstream, so that we can cherry-pick it?
The fix is obvious...
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread
* [Bug sanitizer/64013] [5 Regression] libsanitizer fails to build
2014-11-21 8:43 [Bug sanitizer/64013] New: [5 Regression] libsanitizer fails to build rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
` (2 preceding siblings ...)
2014-11-21 13:46 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2014-11-21 13:56 ` dvyukov at google dot com
2014-11-21 14:04 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
2014-11-24 9:04 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
5 siblings, 0 replies; 7+ messages in thread
From: dvyukov at google dot com @ 2014-11-21 13:56 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64013
Dmitry Vyukov <dvyukov at google dot com> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
CC| |dvyukov at google dot com
--- Comment #3 from Dmitry Vyukov <dvyukov at google dot com> ---
Fixed upstream:
http://llvm.org/viewvc/llvm-project/compiler-rt/trunk/lib/sanitizer_common/sanitizer_linux.cc?r1=222532&r2=222531&pathrev=222532
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread
* [Bug sanitizer/64013] [5 Regression] libsanitizer fails to build
2014-11-21 8:43 [Bug sanitizer/64013] New: [5 Regression] libsanitizer fails to build rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
` (3 preceding siblings ...)
2014-11-21 13:56 ` dvyukov at google dot com
@ 2014-11-21 14:04 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
2014-11-24 9:04 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
5 siblings, 0 replies; 7+ messages in thread
From: jakub at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2014-11-21 14:04 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64013
--- Comment #4 from Jakub Jelinek <jakub at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
Author: jakub
Date: Fri Nov 21 14:03:37 2014
New Revision: 217921
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=217921&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR sanitizer/64013
* sanitizer_common/sanitizer_linux.cc (FileExists): Cherry pick
upstream r222532.
Modified:
trunk/libsanitizer/ChangeLog
trunk/libsanitizer/sanitizer_common/sanitizer_linux.cc
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread
* [Bug sanitizer/64013] [5 Regression] libsanitizer fails to build
2014-11-21 8:43 [Bug sanitizer/64013] New: [5 Regression] libsanitizer fails to build rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
` (4 preceding siblings ...)
2014-11-21 14:04 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2014-11-24 9:04 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
5 siblings, 0 replies; 7+ messages in thread
From: jakub at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2014-11-24 9:04 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64013
Jakub Jelinek <jakub at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|--- |FIXED
--- Comment #5 from Jakub Jelinek <jakub at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
Fixed, thanks Dmitry.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2014-11-24 9:04 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2014-11-21 8:43 [Bug sanitizer/64013] New: [5 Regression] libsanitizer fails to build rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
2014-11-21 8:43 ` [Bug sanitizer/64013] " rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
2014-11-21 8:47 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
2014-11-21 13:46 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
2014-11-21 13:56 ` dvyukov at google dot com
2014-11-21 14:04 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
2014-11-24 9:04 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).