From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-bugs-return-468373-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: (qmail 31761 invoked by alias); 24 Nov 2014 16:31:00 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 31635 invoked by uid 48); 24 Nov 2014 16:30:56 -0000
From: "rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug tree-optimization/64024] [5 Regression] gcc.dg/vect/vect-simd-clone-6.c ICEs
Date: Mon, 24 Nov 2014 16:31:00 -0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: tree-optimization
X-Bugzilla-Version: 5.0
X-Bugzilla-Keywords:
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Status: NEW
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P1
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: 5.0
X-Bugzilla-Flags:
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields:
Message-ID: <bug-64024-4-fnjfIFM5PN@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-64024-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-64024-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-SW-Source: 2014-11/txt/msg02845.txt.bz2

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64024

--- Comment #8 from Richard Biener <rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
Usually it is only that which is hard to recompute, the base is pretty much
stable.  But of course you never know.  You could also simply add
a vec<simd_call_arg_info> to the stmt vinfo struct ...