public inbox for gcc-bugs@sourceware.org
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* [Bug c/64032] New: FAIL: gcc.dg/undefined-loop-2.c (test for warnings, line 18)
@ 2014-11-23 15:30 danglin at gcc dot gnu.org
2014-11-24 11:15 ` [Bug middle-end/64032] [5 Regression] " rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
` (4 more replies)
0 siblings, 5 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: danglin at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2014-11-23 15:30 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64032
Bug ID: 64032
Summary: FAIL: gcc.dg/undefined-loop-2.c (test for warnings,
line 18)
Product: gcc
Version: 5.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: c
Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
Reporter: danglin at gcc dot gnu.org
Host: hppa-unknown-linux-gnu
Target: hppa-unknown-linux-gnu
Build: hppa-unknown-linux-gnu
Executing on host: /home/dave/gnu/gcc/objdir/gcc/xgcc
-B/home/dave/gnu/gcc/objdi
r/gcc/ /home/dave/gnu/gcc/gcc/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/undefined-loop-2.c
-fno-diag
nostics-show-caret -fdiagnostics-color=never -O2
-Waggressive-loop-optimizatio
ns -S -o undefined-loop-2.s (timeout = 300)
spawn /home/dave/gnu/gcc/objdir/gcc/xgcc -B/home/dave/gnu/gcc/objdir/gcc/
/home/
dave/gnu/gcc/gcc/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/undefined-loop-2.c
-fno-diagnostics-show-c
aret -fdiagnostics-color=never -O2 -Waggressive-loop-optimizations -S -o
undefin
ed-loop-2.s
/home/dave/gnu/gcc/gcc/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/undefined-loop-2.c: In function
'foo
':
/home/dave/gnu/gcc/gcc/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/undefined-loop-2.c:19:8: warning:
lo
op exit may only be reached after undefined behavior
[-Waggressive-loop-optimiza
tions]
/home/dave/gnu/gcc/gcc/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/undefined-loop-2.c:17:17: note:
poss
ible undefined statement is here
/home/dave/gnu/gcc/gcc/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/undefined-loop-2.c:16:17: note:
poss
ible undefined statement is here
output is:
/home/dave/gnu/gcc/gcc/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/undefined-loop-2.c: In function
'foo
':
/home/dave/gnu/gcc/gcc/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/undefined-loop-2.c:19:8: warning:
lo
op exit may only be reached after undefined behavior
[-Waggressive-loop-optimiza
tions]
/home/dave/gnu/gcc/gcc/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/undefined-loop-2.c:17:17: note:
possible undefined statement is here
/home/dave/gnu/gcc/gcc/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/undefined-loop-2.c:16:17: note:
possible undefined statement is here
PASS: gcc.dg/undefined-loop-2.c (test for warnings, line 16)
PASS: gcc.dg/undefined-loop-2.c (test for warnings, line 17)
FAIL: gcc.dg/undefined-loop-2.c (test for warnings, line 18)
PASS: gcc.dg/undefined-loop-2.c (test for warnings, line 19)
PASS: gcc.dg/undefined-loop-2.c (test for excess errors)
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* [Bug middle-end/64032] [5 Regression] FAIL: gcc.dg/undefined-loop-2.c (test for warnings, line 18)
2014-11-23 15:30 [Bug c/64032] New: FAIL: gcc.dg/undefined-loop-2.c (test for warnings, line 18) danglin at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2014-11-24 11:15 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
2014-12-10 15:40 ` [Bug testsuite/64032] " rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
` (3 subsequent siblings)
4 siblings, 0 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2014-11-24 11:15 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64032
Richard Biener <rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Target|hppa-unknown-linux-gnu |hppa-unknown-linux-gnu,
| |i?86-*-*
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed| |2014-11-24
Component|c |middle-end
CC| |ams at gcc dot gnu.org
Ever confirmed|0 |1
Summary|FAIL: |[5 Regression] FAIL:
|gcc.dg/undefined-loop-2.c |gcc.dg/undefined-loop-2.c
|(test for warnings, line |(test for warnings, line
|18) |18)
Target Milestone|--- |5.0
--- Comment #1 from Richard Biener <rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
I also see this on x86_64 with -m32.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* [Bug testsuite/64032] [5 Regression] FAIL: gcc.dg/undefined-loop-2.c (test for warnings, line 18)
2014-11-23 15:30 [Bug c/64032] New: FAIL: gcc.dg/undefined-loop-2.c (test for warnings, line 18) danglin at gcc dot gnu.org
2014-11-24 11:15 ` [Bug middle-end/64032] [5 Regression] " rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2014-12-10 15:40 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
2014-12-11 17:47 ` belagod at gcc dot gnu.org
` (2 subsequent siblings)
4 siblings, 0 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2014-12-10 15:40 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64032
Richard Biener <rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Priority|P3 |P1
Component|middle-end |testsuite
--- Comment #3 from Richard Biener <rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
fold has always done this kind of stuff.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* [Bug testsuite/64032] [5 Regression] FAIL: gcc.dg/undefined-loop-2.c (test for warnings, line 18)
2014-11-23 15:30 [Bug c/64032] New: FAIL: gcc.dg/undefined-loop-2.c (test for warnings, line 18) danglin at gcc dot gnu.org
2014-11-24 11:15 ` [Bug middle-end/64032] [5 Regression] " rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
2014-12-10 15:40 ` [Bug testsuite/64032] " rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2014-12-11 17:47 ` belagod at gcc dot gnu.org
2014-12-24 14:27 ` ams at gcc dot gnu.org
2014-12-24 14:29 ` ams at gcc dot gnu.org
4 siblings, 0 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: belagod at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2014-12-11 17:47 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64032
Tejas Belagod <belagod at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
CC| |belagod at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #4 from Tejas Belagod <belagod at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
Also fails on aarch64.
$ aarch64-none-elf-gcc -O2 -Waggressive-loop-optimizations -S
/work/dev/arm/src/gcc/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/undefined-loop-2.c
/work/dev/arm/src/gcc/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/undefined-loop-2.c: In function
'foo':
/work/dev/arm/src/gcc/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/undefined-loop-2.c:19:8: warning:
loop exit may only be reached after undefined behavior
[-Waggressive-loop-optimizations]
&& i < 100; /* { dg-warning "loop exit may only be reached after
undefined behavior" } */
^
/work/dev/arm/src/gcc/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/undefined-loop-2.c:17:17: note:
possible undefined statement is here
: array2[i]) /* { dg-message "note: possible undefined statement is
here" } */
^
/work/dev/arm/src/gcc/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/undefined-loop-2.c:16:17: note:
possible undefined statement is here
? array1[i] /* { dg-message "note: possible undefined statement is
here" } */
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* [Bug testsuite/64032] [5 Regression] FAIL: gcc.dg/undefined-loop-2.c (test for warnings, line 18)
2014-11-23 15:30 [Bug c/64032] New: FAIL: gcc.dg/undefined-loop-2.c (test for warnings, line 18) danglin at gcc dot gnu.org
` (2 preceding siblings ...)
2014-12-11 17:47 ` belagod at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2014-12-24 14:27 ` ams at gcc dot gnu.org
2014-12-24 14:29 ` ams at gcc dot gnu.org
4 siblings, 0 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: ams at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2014-12-24 14:27 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64032
--- Comment #5 from Andrew Stubbs <ams at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
Author: ams
Date: Wed Dec 24 14:27:06 2014
New Revision: 219059
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=219059&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
Fix undefined-loop-2.c test case.
2014-12-24 Andrew Stubbs <ams@codesourcery.com>
PR testsuite/64032
* gcc.dg/undefined-loop-2.c: Don't allow GCC to optimize away the
loop exits too early.
Modified:
trunk/gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog
trunk/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/undefined-loop-2.c
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* [Bug testsuite/64032] [5 Regression] FAIL: gcc.dg/undefined-loop-2.c (test for warnings, line 18)
2014-11-23 15:30 [Bug c/64032] New: FAIL: gcc.dg/undefined-loop-2.c (test for warnings, line 18) danglin at gcc dot gnu.org
` (3 preceding siblings ...)
2014-12-24 14:27 ` ams at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2014-12-24 14:29 ` ams at gcc dot gnu.org
4 siblings, 0 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: ams at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2014-12-24 14:29 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64032
Andrew Stubbs <ams at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|--- |FIXED
--- Comment #6 from Andrew Stubbs <ams at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
I've just committed a patch to fix this. It works on x86_64, ARM, and PowerPC,
at least.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2014-12-24 14:29 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2014-11-23 15:30 [Bug c/64032] New: FAIL: gcc.dg/undefined-loop-2.c (test for warnings, line 18) danglin at gcc dot gnu.org
2014-11-24 11:15 ` [Bug middle-end/64032] [5 Regression] " rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
2014-12-10 15:40 ` [Bug testsuite/64032] " rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
2014-12-11 17:47 ` belagod at gcc dot gnu.org
2014-12-24 14:27 ` ams at gcc dot gnu.org
2014-12-24 14:29 ` ams at gcc dot gnu.org
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).