public inbox for gcc-bugs@sourceware.org help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* [Bug c++/64053] New: asm labels to accept extra parameters @ 2014-11-24 14:57 eugene at hutorny dot in.ua 2014-11-24 15:00 ` [Bug c++/64053] " eugene at hutorny dot in.ua 2024-03-17 7:17 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org 0 siblings, 2 replies; 3+ messages in thread From: eugene at hutorny dot in.ua @ 2014-11-24 14:57 UTC (permalink / raw) To: gcc-bugs https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64053 Bug ID: 64053 Summary: asm labels to accept extra parameters Product: gcc Version: 4.7.2 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: enhancement Priority: P3 Component: c++ Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org Reporter: eugene at hutorny dot in.ua Host: Linux 2.6.32-5-686 Target: avr Current syntax of asm labels accepts only a string literal int foo asm ("myfoo"); This limits label generation to pre-processing time. If asm label would accept constant expressions as asm statement does, it would open possibilities for generating function labels with c++ templates as attached example illustrates. ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
* [Bug c++/64053] asm labels to accept extra parameters 2014-11-24 14:57 [Bug c++/64053] New: asm labels to accept extra parameters eugene at hutorny dot in.ua @ 2014-11-24 15:00 ` eugene at hutorny dot in.ua 2024-03-17 7:17 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org 1 sibling, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread From: eugene at hutorny dot in.ua @ 2014-11-24 15:00 UTC (permalink / raw) To: gcc-bugs https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64053 --- Comment #1 from Eugene <eugene at hutorny dot in.ua> --- Created attachment 34098 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=34098&action=edit code sample for illustartion ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
* [Bug c++/64053] asm labels to accept extra parameters 2014-11-24 14:57 [Bug c++/64053] New: asm labels to accept extra parameters eugene at hutorny dot in.ua 2014-11-24 15:00 ` [Bug c++/64053] " eugene at hutorny dot in.ua @ 2024-03-17 7:17 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org 1 sibling, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread From: pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2024-03-17 7:17 UTC (permalink / raw) To: gcc-bugs https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64053 Andrew Pinski <pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed| |2024-03-17 Keywords| |inline-asm Ever confirmed|0 |1 --- Comment #2 from Andrew Pinski <pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org> --- I wonder if doing constexpr is better similar in the way that is proposed for inline-asm : https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc-patches/2024-March/647821.html This would be easier to support I think and would be more obvious and stuff like fmt supports formating at compile time with constexpr even. ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2024-03-17 7:17 UTC | newest] Thread overview: 3+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed) -- links below jump to the message on this page -- 2014-11-24 14:57 [Bug c++/64053] New: asm labels to accept extra parameters eugene at hutorny dot in.ua 2014-11-24 15:00 ` [Bug c++/64053] " eugene at hutorny dot in.ua 2024-03-17 7:17 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox; as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).