From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 19210 invoked by alias); 27 Nov 2014 07:59:17 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 19184 invoked by uid 48); 27 Nov 2014 07:59:13 -0000 From: "gcc at dixie dot net.nz" To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug c++/64077] dynamic_cast incorrectly rejected for private base Date: Thu, 27 Nov 2014 07:59:00 -0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc X-Bugzilla-Component: c++ X-Bugzilla-Version: unknown X-Bugzilla-Keywords: X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal X-Bugzilla-Who: gcc at dixie dot net.nz X-Bugzilla-Status: UNCONFIRMED X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3 X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: --- X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 X-SW-Source: 2014-11/txt/msg03201.txt.bz2 https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D64077 --- Comment #2 from Andrew Dixie --- (In reply to Daniel Kr=C3=BCgler from comment #1) Thanks for investigating and providing the reference. I did not understand that upcasts were intended to override potential cross casts, issue 665 makes this clear. I agree the testcase is invalid. In p5, is "inaccessible" meant to include friendship relationships granted = by the current scope or instead use the explicit public base rules spelt out in p8? The second part of the patch was implementing the latter, but I now also th= ink this is invalid. >>From gcc-bugs-return-468730-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org Thu Nov 27 08:35:27 2014 Return-Path: Delivered-To: listarch-gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 6917 invoked by alias); 27 Nov 2014 08:35:26 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org Delivered-To: mailing list gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 6877 invoked by uid 48); 27 Nov 2014 08:35:19 -0000 From: "manfred.rudigier at omicron dot at" To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug target/62231] Exception handling broken on powerpc-e500v2-linux-gnuspe Date: Thu, 27 Nov 2014 08:35:00 -0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc X-Bugzilla-Component: target X-Bugzilla-Version: 4.8.3 X-Bugzilla-Keywords: X-Bugzilla-Severity: critical X-Bugzilla-Who: manfred.rudigier at omicron dot at X-Bugzilla-Status: UNCONFIRMED X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3 X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: --- X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 X-SW-Source: 2014-11/txt/msg03202.txt.bz2 Content-length: 260 https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62231 --- Comment #2 from manfred.rudigier at omicron dot at --- I've built 4.9.2 today and can also confirm that it is working with this version, so it seems the bug has already been fixed in newer GCC versions.