From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 15479 invoked by alias); 27 Nov 2014 21:05:18 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 15455 invoked by uid 48); 27 Nov 2014 21:05:15 -0000 From: "daniel.kruegler at googlemail dot com" To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug c++/64077] dynamic_cast incorrectly rejected for private base Date: Thu, 27 Nov 2014 21:05:00 -0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc X-Bugzilla-Component: c++ X-Bugzilla-Version: unknown X-Bugzilla-Keywords: X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal X-Bugzilla-Who: daniel.kruegler at googlemail dot com X-Bugzilla-Status: RESOLVED X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3 X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: --- X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 X-SW-Source: 2014-11/txt/msg03270.txt.bz2 https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D64077 --- Comment #5 from Daniel Kr=C3=BCgler --- (In reply to Andrew Dixie from comment #4) > If the 'accessible' in p5 includes friendships relationships, then the > dynamic_cast should succeed. Yes, friendship relations need to be considered when accessibility is teste= d. > If the 'accessible' in p5 requires a public base (like is required by p8), > then the dynamic cast should fail (or be ill-formed). > I think the wording of the standard clearly specifies succeed. Yes. >>From gcc-bugs-return-468797-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org Thu Nov 27 21:05:04 2014 Return-Path: Delivered-To: listarch-gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 14765 invoked by alias); 27 Nov 2014 21:05:04 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org Delivered-To: mailing list gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 14720 invoked by uid 48); 27 Nov 2014 21:05:00 -0000 From: "hjl.tools at gmail dot com" To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug target/63833] REAL_PIC_OFFSET_TABLE_REGNUM is wrong for x86-64 Date: Thu, 27 Nov 2014 21:05:00 -0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc X-Bugzilla-Component: target X-Bugzilla-Version: 5.0 X-Bugzilla-Keywords: X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal X-Bugzilla-Who: hjl.tools at gmail dot com X-Bugzilla-Status: RESOLVED X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3 X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: 5.0 X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: bug_status resolution Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 X-SW-Source: 2014-11/txt/msg03269.txt.bz2 Content-length: 414 https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63833 H.J. Lu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|--- |FIXED --- Comment #3 from H.J. Lu --- Fixed.