From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 23472 invoked by alias); 2 Dec 2014 13:34:35 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 23426 invoked by uid 48); 2 Dec 2014 13:34:30 -0000 From: "redi at gcc dot gnu.org" To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug libstdc++/64096] std::list, set and map violate a rule about allocator::construct Date: Tue, 02 Dec 2014 13:34:00 -0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc X-Bugzilla-Component: libstdc++ X-Bugzilla-Version: 4.9.0 X-Bugzilla-Keywords: X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal X-Bugzilla-Who: redi at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Status: RESOLVED X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3 X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: 5.0 X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 X-SW-Source: 2014-12/txt/msg00213.txt.bz2 https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D64096 --- Comment #4 from Jonathan Wakely --- For completeness, the error for std::list now shows: a.cc: In instantiation of =E2=80=98void my_allocator::construct(U*, Args= && ...) [with U =3D int; Args =3D {int}; T =3D std::_Rb_tree_node]=E2=80=99: which is consistent with maps and sets now. I actually consider it a bug that you don't get the assertion for other containers too! The unordered containers and forward_list should not bother constructing a rebound allocator to call construct/destroy. >>From gcc-bugs-return-469207-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org Tue Dec 02 13:35:49 2014 Return-Path: Delivered-To: listarch-gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 24656 invoked by alias); 2 Dec 2014 13:35:48 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org Delivered-To: mailing list gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 24636 invoked by uid 55); 2 Dec 2014 13:35:45 -0000 From: "vries at gcc dot gnu.org" To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug rtl-optimization/63718] [5 Regression] ARM Thumb1 bootstrap fail after fuse-caller-save info in cprop-hardreg Date: Tue, 02 Dec 2014 13:35:00 -0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc X-Bugzilla-Component: rtl-optimization X-Bugzilla-Version: 5.0 X-Bugzilla-Keywords: patch, wrong-code X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal X-Bugzilla-Who: vries at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Status: UNCONFIRMED X-Bugzilla-Priority: P1 X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: 5.0 X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 X-SW-Source: 2014-12/txt/msg00214.txt.bz2 Content-length: 470 https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63718 --- Comment #16 from vries at gcc dot gnu.org --- Author: vries Date: Tue Dec 2 13:35:10 2014 New Revision: 218271 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=218271&root=gcc&view=rev Log: 2014-12-02 Tom de Vries PR rtl-optimization/63718 * config/arm/arm.c (arm_option_override): Disable fuse-caller-save for Thumb1. Modified: trunk/gcc/ChangeLog trunk/gcc/config/arm/arm.c