public inbox for gcc-bugs@sourceware.org
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "ktietz at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug c++/64100] A static assert using the the current class in a noexcept test leads to a segfault
Date: Thu, 04 Dec 2014 11:22:00 -0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <bug-64100-4-UiYQ6nANgV@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <bug-64100-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64100

Kai Tietz <ktietz at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|NEW                         |ASSIGNED

--- Comment #5 from Kai Tietz <ktietz at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
(In reply to Jason Merrill from comment #4)
> (In reply to Kai Tietz from comment #2)
> > Following patch fixes this issue for me:
> 
> Were you going to send the patch to the list?

Yes, I will send it today to ML.  I will put you CC.

> > +  if (!expr)
> > +    {
> > +      cxx_incomplete_type_error (dtor_name, dtor_type);
> > +      return error_mark_node;
> > +    }
> 
> The error needs to be conditional on (complain & tf_error).

Ok, I'll add that.

> Does the caller handle error_mark_node properly?

Yes, I tested it before.  By just returning error_mark_node the testcase will
be processed completely silently by g++.


  parent reply	other threads:[~2014-12-04 11:22 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2014-11-28 10:57 [Bug c++/64100] New: " ville.voutilainen at gmail dot com
2014-12-03  9:49 ` [Bug c++/64100] " mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org
2014-12-03 10:38 ` ktietz at gcc dot gnu.org
2014-12-03 15:52 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
2014-12-03 21:56 ` jason at gcc dot gnu.org
2014-12-04 11:22 ` ktietz at gcc dot gnu.org [this message]
2014-12-10 11:23 ` ktietz at gcc dot gnu.org
2014-12-10 11:27 ` ktietz at gcc dot gnu.org
2014-12-10 16:28 ` ktietz at gcc dot gnu.org

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=bug-64100-4-UiYQ6nANgV@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ \
    --to=gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org \
    --cc=gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).