From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-bugs-return-469138-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: (qmail 25000 invoked by alias); 1 Dec 2014 20:13:49 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 24952 invoked by uid 48); 1 Dec 2014 20:13:45 -0000
From: "wong.david-c at epa dot gov" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug fortran/64138] gfortran interface issue
Date: Mon, 01 Dec 2014 20:13:00 -0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: fortran
X-Bugzilla-Version: 4.9.3
X-Bugzilla-Keywords:
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: wong.david-c at epa dot gov
X-Bugzilla-Status: UNCONFIRMED
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: ---
X-Bugzilla-Flags:
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields:
Message-ID: <bug-64138-4-IS44QEfym3@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-64138-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-64138-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-SW-Source: 2014-12/txt/msg00145.txt.bz2

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64138

--- Comment #3 from david <wong.david-c at epa dot gov> ---
(In reply to david from comment #0)
> Hi,
> 
>    I have created a complex number module:
> 
>        module complex_number_module
>         implicit none
> 
>         integer, parameter :: loc_real_precision = 8
> 
>         type complex_number
>           real(kind=loc_real_precision) :: real_part, imag_part
>         end type complex_number
> 
>         interface c_sub
>           module procedure c_sub_cc,    &      ! z1 - z2
>                            c_sub_cr,    &      ! z1 - num, where num is a
> real number
>                            c_sub_rc            ! num - z1, where num is a
> real number
>         end interface
> 
> ! --------------------------------------------------------------------------
>         type (complex_number) function c_sub_cc (z1, z2)
> 
>         type (complex_number), intent(in) :: z1, z2
> 
>         c_sub_cc%real_part = z1%real_part - z2%real_part
>         c_sub_cc%imag_part = z1%imag_part - z2%imag_part
> 
>         end function c_sub_ccj
> 
> ! --------------------------------------------------------------------------
>         type (complex_number) function c_sub_cr (z1, num)
> 
>         type (complex_number),     intent(in) :: z1
>         real(kind=loc_real_precision), intent(in) :: num
> 
>         c_sub_cr%real_part = z1%real_part - num
>         c_sub_cr%imag_part = z1%imag_part
> 
>         end function c_sub_cr
> 
> ! --------------------------------------------------------------------------
>         type (complex_number) function c_sub_rc (num, z1)
> 
>         type (complex_number),     intent(in) :: z1
>         real(kind=loc_real_precision), intent(in) :: num
> 
>         c_sub_rc%real_part = num - z1%real_part
>         c_sub_rc%imag_part = - z1%imag_part
> 
>         end function c_sub_rc
> 
>       end module complex_number_module
> 
> When I compile with gfortran (version 4.6.4), I got the following error:
> 
> module_twoway_rrtmg_aero_optical_util.F:14.85:
> 
>                  c_sub_rc            ! num - z1, where num is a real number
>                                                                            1
> 
> Error: Ambiguous interfaces 'c_sub_rc' and 'c_sub_cr' in generic interface
> 'c_sub' at (1)
> 
> I don't see any ambiguity and I don't encounter any problem with other
> compilers such pgi and ifort. Please advise.
> 
> Cheers,
> David

Hi,

   I have attached a smaller version of the code and the way I compiled the
code is:

   gfortran -c -ffree-form d.F

Thanks,
David