From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-bugs-return-469240-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: (qmail 17901 invoked by alias); 2 Dec 2014 17:29:05 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 17859 invoked by uid 55); 2 Dec 2014 17:29:01 -0000
From: "sgk at troutmask dot apl.washington.edu" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug fortran/64138] gfortran interface issue
Date: Tue, 02 Dec 2014 17:29:00 -0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: fortran
X-Bugzilla-Version: 4.9.3
X-Bugzilla-Keywords:
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: sgk at troutmask dot apl.washington.edu
X-Bugzilla-Status: WAITING
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: ---
X-Bugzilla-Flags:
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields:
Message-ID: <bug-64138-4-ZKcHym7qUn@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-64138-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-64138-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-SW-Source: 2014-12/txt/msg00247.txt.bz2

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64138

--- Comment #8 from Steve Kargl <sgk at troutmask dot apl.washington.edu> ---
On Tue, Dec 02, 2014 at 05:13:09PM +0000, dominiq at lps dot ens.fr wrote:
> 
> To conclude I think this PR should be closed as INVALID.
> 

That's the conclusion that I'm leaning towards.  Reading
section 16 of the standard always makes my head hurt, so
I'm being caution while looking for some subtle point 
that I may have missed.