From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 13546 invoked by alias); 15 Dec 2014 16:49:29 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 13505 invoked by uid 48); 15 Dec 2014 16:49:25 -0000 From: "rearnsha at gcc dot gnu.org" To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug target/64149] -mno-lra bitrots, suggest to remove for GCC 5 Date: Mon, 15 Dec 2014 16:49:00 -0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc X-Bugzilla-Component: target X-Bugzilla-Version: 5.0 X-Bugzilla-Keywords: ice-on-valid-code X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal X-Bugzilla-Who: rearnsha at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Status: UNCONFIRMED X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3 X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: --- X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 X-SW-Source: 2014-12/txt/msg01774.txt.bz2 https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64149 --- Comment #2 from Richard Earnshaw --- Sounds sensible to me. We switched to LRA quite late in gcc-4.9, so keeping a way to switch back in case of problems was pragmatic. But we've been running with the new code now for a year and not encountered any major issues that couldn't be fixed pretty quickly.