public inbox for gcc-bugs@sourceware.org
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug middle-end/64225] [4.8/4.9/5 Regression] -funsafe-math-optimizations generates call to pow where multiply instruction would do
Date: Tue, 09 Dec 2014 15:37:00 -0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <bug-64225-4-6zJwbouYkz@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <bug-64225-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64225
--- Comment #11 from ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org ---
(In reply to Bill Schmidt from comment #10)
> Agreed. I will test the fix Richard suggested. Assuming no regressions,
> does pre-approval include backports to 4.8 and 4.9?
Thanks for taking this up. FWIW I've bootstrapped this on x86_64 trunk
succesfully. Will try aarch64 as well.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-12-09 15:37 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 17+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-12-08 15:08 [Bug middle-end/64225] New: " bernie.ogden at linaro dot org
2014-12-08 15:08 ` [Bug middle-end/64225] " bernie.ogden at linaro dot org
2014-12-08 15:16 ` ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org
2014-12-08 15:20 ` ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org
2014-12-08 15:24 ` ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org
2014-12-08 15:30 ` jgreenhalgh at gcc dot gnu.org
2014-12-08 15:36 ` ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org
2014-12-08 16:56 ` joseph at codesourcery dot com
2014-12-09 12:52 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
2014-12-09 12:53 ` [Bug middle-end/64225] [4.8/4.9/5 Regression] " rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
2014-12-09 15:27 ` wschmidt at gcc dot gnu.org
2014-12-09 15:37 ` ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org [this message]
2014-12-09 23:02 ` wschmidt at gcc dot gnu.org
2014-12-09 23:07 ` wschmidt at gcc dot gnu.org
2014-12-10 13:23 ` [Bug middle-end/64225] [4.8/4.9 " rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
2014-12-10 17:47 ` wschmidt at gcc dot gnu.org
2014-12-10 17:48 ` wschmidt at gcc dot gnu.org
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=bug-64225-4-6zJwbouYkz@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ \
--to=gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org \
--cc=gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).