From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 8085 invoked by alias); 10 Dec 2014 10:33:59 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 8070 invoked by uid 48); 10 Dec 2014 10:33:55 -0000 From: "trippels at gcc dot gnu.org" To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug c++/64251] [5 Regression] Chromium build error only with --enable-checking=yes Date: Wed, 10 Dec 2014 10:33:00 -0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc X-Bugzilla-Component: c++ X-Bugzilla-Version: 5.0 X-Bugzilla-Keywords: X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal X-Bugzilla-Who: trippels at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Status: UNCONFIRMED X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3 X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: --- X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 X-SW-Source: 2014-12/txt/msg01030.txt.bz2 https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D64251 --- Comment #1 from Markus Trippelsdorf --- For example: markus@x4 /tmp % cat foo.ii class DictionaryValue {}; template void CreateValue(T) { DictionaryValue(0); CreateValue(0); } markus@x4 /tmp % checking-release/g++ -std=3Dc++11 -c foo.ii markus@x4 /tmp % checking-yes/g++ -std=3Dc++11 -c foo.ii foo.ii: In instantiation of =E2=80=98void CreateValue(T) [with T =3D int]= =E2=80=99: foo.ii:4:17: required from here foo.ii:3:4: error: no matching function for call to =E2=80=98DictionaryValue::DictionaryValue(int)=E2=80=99 DictionaryValue(0); ^ foo.ii:1:7: note: candidate: constexpr DictionaryValue::DictionaryValue() class DictionaryValue {}; ^ foo.ii:1:7: note: candidate expects 0 arguments, 1 provided foo.ii:1:7: note: candidate: constexpr DictionaryValue::DictionaryValue(con= st DictionaryValue&) foo.ii:1:7: note: no known conversion for argument 1 from =E2=80=98int=E2= =80=99 to =E2=80=98const DictionaryValue&=E2=80=99 foo.ii:1:7: note: candidate: constexpr DictionaryValue::DictionaryValue(DictionaryValue&&) foo.ii:1:7: note: no known conversion for argument 1 from =E2=80=98int=E2= =80=99 to =E2=80=98DictionaryValue&&=E2=80=99 >>From gcc-bugs-return-470024-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org Wed Dec 10 10:37:11 2014 Return-Path: Delivered-To: listarch-gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 11772 invoked by alias); 10 Dec 2014 10:37:11 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org Delivered-To: mailing list gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 11714 invoked by uid 48); 10 Dec 2014 10:37:07 -0000 From: "dominiq at lps dot ens.fr" To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug bootstrap/64023] [5 Regression] r216964 breaks bootstrap on darwin when using gcc as the bootstrap compiler. Date: Wed, 10 Dec 2014 10:37:00 -0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc X-Bugzilla-Component: bootstrap X-Bugzilla-Version: 5.0 X-Bugzilla-Keywords: patch X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal X-Bugzilla-Who: dominiq at lps dot ens.fr X-Bugzilla-Status: NEW X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3 X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: fxcoudert at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: 5.0 X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: cc Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 X-SW-Source: 2014-12/txt/msg01031.txt.bz2 Content-length: 498 https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64023 Dominique d'Humieres changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |law at redhat dot com --- Comment #5 from Dominique d'Humieres --- A working patch as been committed at https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc/2014-12/msg00044.html. Could it be reviewed?