[Bug target/64264] New: [5 Regression] s390 bootstrap fails in ada

public inbox for gcc-bugs@sourceware.org
help / color / mirror / Atom feed

* [Bug target/64264] New: [5 Regression] s390 bootstrap fails in ada
@ 2014-12-11 11:16 rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
  2014-12-11 11:16 ` [Bug target/64264] " rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
                   ` (3 more replies)
  0 siblings, 4 replies; 5+ messages in thread
From: rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2014-12-11 11:16 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: gcc-bugs

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64264

            Bug ID: 64264
           Summary: [5 Regression] s390 bootstrap fails in ada
           Product: gcc
           Version: 5.0
            Status: UNCONFIRMED
          Keywords: build, ice-on-valid-code
          Severity: normal
          Priority: P3
         Component: target
          Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
          Reporter: rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
            Target: s390-linux

[ 5208s] +===========================GNAT BUG
DETECTED==============================+
[ 5208s] | 5.0.0 20141210 (experimental) [trunk revision 218580]
(s390-suse-linux)  |
[ 5208s] | Storage_Error stack overflow or erroneous memory access             
    |
[ 5208s] | Error detected at s-stalib.ads:75:42                                
    |
[ 5208s] | Please submit a bug report; see http://gcc.gnu.org/bugs.html.       
    |
[ 5208s] | Use a subject line meaningful to you and us to track the bug.       
    |
[ 5208s] | Include the entire contents of this bug box in the report.          
    |
[ 5208s] | Include the exact command that you entered.                         
    |
[ 5208s] | Also include sources listed below.                                  
    |
[ 5208s]
+==========================================================================+
[ 5208s] 
[ 5208s] Please include these source files with error report
[ 5208s] Note that list may not be accurate in some cases,
[ 5208s] so please double check that the problem can still
[ 5208s] be reproduced with the set of files listed.
[ 5208s] Consider also -gnatd.n switch (see debug.adb).
[ 5208s] 
[ 5208s] ../../gcc/ada/system.ads
[ 5208s] ../../gcc/ada/a-ioexce.ads
[ 5208s] ../../gcc/ada/ada.ads
[ 5208s] ../../gcc/ada/s-exctab.ads
[ 5208s] ../../gcc/ada/s-stalib.ads
[ 5208s] ../../gcc/ada/a-unccon.ads
[ 5208s] 
[ 5208s] compilation abandoned
[ 5208s] ../../gcc/ada/gcc-interface/Make-lang.in:123: recipe for target
'ada/a-ioexce.o' failed
[ 5208s] make[3]: *** [ada/a-ioexce.o] Error 1
[ 5208s] make[3]: *** Waiting for unfinished jobs....
[ 5208s] +===========================GNAT BUG
DETECTED==============================+
[ 5208s] | 5.0.0 20141210 (experimental) [trunk revision 218580]
(s390-suse-linux)  |
[ 5208s] | Storage_Error stack overflow or erroneous memory access             
    |
[ 5208s] | Error detected at s-stalib.ads:75:42                                
    |
[ 5208s] | Please submit a bug report; see http://gcc.gnu.org/bugs.html.       
    |
[ 5208s] | Use a subject line meaningful to you and us to track the bug.       
    |
[ 5208s] | Include the entire contents of this bug box in the report.          
    |
[ 5208s] | Include the exact command that you entered.                         
    |
[ 5208s] | Also include sources listed below.                                  
    |
[ 5208s]
+==========================================================================+
[ 5208s] 
[ 5208s] Please include these source files with error report
[ 5208s] Note that list may not be accurate in some cases,
[ 5208s] so please double check that the problem can still
[ 5208s] be reproduced with the set of files listed.
[ 5208s] Consider also -gnatd.n switch (see debug.adb).
[ 5208s] 
[ 5208s] ../../gcc/ada/system.ads
[ 5208s] ../../gcc/ada/a-except.adb
[ 5208s] ../../gcc/ada/a-except.ads
[ 5208s] ../../gcc/ada/ada.ads
[ 5208s] ../../gcc/ada/s-parame.ads
[ 5208s] ../../gcc/ada/s-stalib.ads
[ 5208s] ../../gcc/ada/a-unccon.ads
[ 5208s] ../../gcc/ada/s-traent.ads
[ 5208s] ../../gcc/ada/s-excdeb.ads
[ 5208s] ../../gcc/ada/s-soflin.ads
[ 5208s] ../../gcc/ada/s-stache.ads
[ 5208s] ../../gcc/ada/s-stoele.ads
[ 5208s] 
[ 5208s] compilation abandoned
[ 5208s] +===========================GNAT BUG
DETECTED==============================+
[ 5208s] | 5.0.0 20141210 (experimental) [trunk revision 218580]
(s390-suse-linux)  |
[ 5208s] | Storage_Error stack overflow or erroneous memory access             
    |
[ 5208s] | Error detected at s-stalib.ads:75:42                                
    |
[ 5208s] | Please submit a bug report; see http://gcc.gnu.org/bugs.html.       
    |
[ 5208s] | Use a subject line meaningful to you and us to track the bug.       
    |
[ 5208s] | Include the entire contents of this bug box in the report.          
    |
[ 5208s] | Include the exact command that you entered.                         
    |
[ 5208s] | Also include sources listed below.                                  
    |
[ 5208s]
+==========================================================================+
[ 5208s] 
[ 5208s] Please include these source files with error report
[ 5208s] Note that list may not be accurate in some cases,
[ 5208s] so please double check that the problem can still
[ 5208s] be reproduced with the set of files listed.
[ 5208s] Consider also -gnatd.n switch (see debug.adb).
[ 5208s] 
[ 5208s] ../../gcc/ada/system.ads
[ 5208s] ../../gcc/ada/a-elchha.adb
[ 5208s] ../../gcc/ada/a-elchha.ads
[ 5208s] ../../gcc/ada/a-except.ads
[ 5208s] ../../gcc/ada/ada.ads
[ 5208s] ../../gcc/ada/s-parame.ads
[ 5208s] ../../gcc/ada/s-stalib.ads
[ 5208s] ../../gcc/ada/a-unccon.ads
[ 5208s] ../../gcc/ada/s-traent.ads
[ 5208s] ../../gcc/ada/s-soflin.ads
[ 5208s] ../../gcc/ada/s-stache.ads
[ 5208s] ../../gcc/ada/s-stoele.ads
[ 5208s] 
[ 5208s] compilation abandoned
[ 5208s] ../../gcc/ada/gcc-interface/Make-lang.in:119: recipe for target
'ada/a-elchha.o' failed
[ 5208s] make[3]: *** [ada/a-elchha.o] Error 1
[ 5208s] ../../gcc/ada/gcc-interface/Make-lang.in:970: recipe for target
'ada/a-except.o' failed
[ 5208s] make[3]: *** [ada/a-except.o] Error 1
[ 5211s] rm fsf-funding.pod grmic.pod gcov.pod gc-analyze.pod cpp.pod gfdl.pod
gfortran.pod gcc.pod gcj-dbtool.pod gccgo.pod gcj.pod jcf-dump.pod
jv-convert.pod gcov-tool.pod gij.pod
[ 5211s] make[3]: Leaving directory
'/home/abuild/rpmbuild/BUILD/gcc-5.0.0-r218580/obj-s390-suse-linux/gcc'
[ 5211s] Makefile:4398: recipe for target 'all-stage3-gcc' failed
[ 5211s] make[2]: *** [all-stage3-gcc] Error 2
[ 5211s] make[2]: Leaving directory
'/home/abuild/rpmbuild/BUILD/gcc-5.0.0-r218580/obj-s390-suse-linux'
[ 5211s] Makefile:20744: recipe for target 'stage3-bubble' failed
[ 5211s] make[1]: *** [stage3-bubble] Error 2
[ 5211s] make[1]: Leaving directory
'/home/abuild/rpmbuild/BUILD/gcc-5.0.0-r218580/obj-s390-suse-linux'
[ 5211s] Makefile:886: recipe for target 'all' failed
[ 5211s] make: *** [all] Error 2


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread

* [Bug target/64264] [5 Regression] s390 bootstrap fails in ada
  2014-12-11 11:16 [Bug target/64264] New: [5 Regression] s390 bootstrap fails in ada rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2014-12-11 11:16 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
  2014-12-12 23:27 ` ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org
                   ` (2 subsequent siblings)
  3 siblings, 0 replies; 5+ messages in thread
From: rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2014-12-11 11:16 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: gcc-bugs

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64264

Richard Biener <rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
   Target Milestone|---                         |5.0


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread

* [Bug target/64264] [5 Regression] s390 bootstrap fails in ada
  2014-12-11 11:16 [Bug target/64264] New: [5 Regression] s390 bootstrap fails in ada rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
  2014-12-11 11:16 ` [Bug target/64264] " rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2014-12-12 23:27 ` ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org
  2014-12-15  9:08 ` rguenther at suse dot de
  2015-01-15 12:56 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
  3 siblings, 0 replies; 5+ messages in thread
From: ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2014-12-12 23:27 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: gcc-bugs

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64264

Eric Botcazou <ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|UNCONFIRMED                 |WAITING
   Last reconfirmed|                            |2014-12-12
                 CC|                            |ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org
     Ever confirmed|0                           |1

--- Comment #1 from Eric Botcazou <ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
I cannot reproduce with a cross-compiler, does it also happen with the stage1
compiler or the stage2 compiler?


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread

* [Bug target/64264] [5 Regression] s390 bootstrap fails in ada
  2014-12-11 11:16 [Bug target/64264] New: [5 Regression] s390 bootstrap fails in ada rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
  2014-12-11 11:16 ` [Bug target/64264] " rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
  2014-12-12 23:27 ` ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2014-12-15  9:08 ` rguenther at suse dot de
  2015-01-15 12:56 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
  3 siblings, 0 replies; 5+ messages in thread
From: rguenther at suse dot de @ 2014-12-15  9:08 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: gcc-bugs

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64264

--- Comment #2 from rguenther at suse dot de <rguenther at suse dot de> ---
On Fri, 12 Dec 2014, ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org wrote:

> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64264
> 
> Eric Botcazou <ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:
> 
>            What    |Removed                     |Added
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------------
>              Status|UNCONFIRMED                 |WAITING
>    Last reconfirmed|                            |2014-12-12
>                  CC|                            |ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org
>      Ever confirmed|0                           |1
> 
> --- Comment #1 from Eric Botcazou <ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
> I cannot reproduce with a cross-compiler, does it also happen with the stage1
> compiler or the stage2 compiler?

I don't know - this error happens during all-stage3-gcc, thus it looks
like it might be a miscompile of stage2.


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread

* [Bug target/64264] [5 Regression] s390 bootstrap fails in ada
  2014-12-11 11:16 [Bug target/64264] New: [5 Regression] s390 bootstrap fails in ada rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
                   ` (2 preceding siblings ...)
  2014-12-15  9:08 ` rguenther at suse dot de
@ 2015-01-15 12:56 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
  3 siblings, 0 replies; 5+ messages in thread
From: rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2015-01-15 12:56 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: gcc-bugs

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64264

Richard Biener <rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|WAITING                     |RESOLVED
         Resolution|---                         |FIXED

--- Comment #3 from Richard Biener <rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
Works again for me.


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread

end of thread, other threads:[~2015-01-15 12:56 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: 5+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2014-12-11 11:16 [Bug target/64264] New: [5 Regression] s390 bootstrap fails in ada rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
2014-12-11 11:16 ` [Bug target/64264] " rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
2014-12-12 23:27 ` ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org
2014-12-15  9:08 ` rguenther at suse dot de
2015-01-15 12:56 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).