From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: by sourceware.org (Postfix, from userid 48) id 9D3CF3858C54; Thu, 29 Dec 2022 02:37:40 +0000 (GMT) DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org 9D3CF3858C54 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gcc.gnu.org; s=default; t=1672281460; bh=pIFPhTFX0UgvrTtIYB9HPa3/ZRIPZUPbSmCd0/e9y/w=; h=From:To:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From; b=KeVi6H7Xv1WYXiepQ3j5MKuNiKiiL6ZUtZnc/6AxCK1khYxxHqT7uMTnNVmwj/AJZ KzIUO2EAsNGcdW3xE/lreFy3+YVjVkmEjlsF3VeZYVFlj/n7zzyt28Op/o40TGyrFp /HNHOVJsBWq/e9xqBgDxkC2ML/0Ihtvu6YqjLIVM= From: "pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org" To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug c++/64266] Can GCC produce local mergeable symbols for *.__FUNCTION__ and *.__PRETTY_FUNCTION__ functions? Date: Thu, 29 Dec 2022 02:37:40 +0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc X-Bugzilla-Component: c++ X-Bugzilla-Version: 5.0 X-Bugzilla-Keywords: missed-optimization X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal X-Bugzilla-Who: pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Status: RESOLVED X-Bugzilla-Resolution: FIXED X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3 X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: marxin at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: 9.0 X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: target_milestone Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 List-Id: https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D64266 Andrew Pinski changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Target Milestone|6.5 |9.0=