public inbox for gcc-bugs@sourceware.org help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "me at williamgrant dot id.au" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org> To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug target/64304] New: AArch64 miscompilation with -mgeneral-regs-only Date: Sun, 14 Dec 2014 11:18:00 -0000 [thread overview] Message-ID: <bug-64304-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/> (raw) https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64304 Bug ID: 64304 Summary: AArch64 miscompilation with -mgeneral-regs-only Product: gcc Version: unknown Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: target Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org Reporter: me at williamgrant dot id.au The aarch64 target, from 4.8.0 to today's master (tested up to 4b686186), drops an "and x0, x0, #0x7" in some integer-only code when built with -mgeneral-regs-only. Ignoring register assignment, the only change in the resultant code is the missing and. It works fine without -mgeneral-regs-only and on several other targets. This test case is quite fragile. The original code didn't need -fno-inline to reproduce it, and the problem disappeared in an earlier test with -fno-tree-vrp. -fdump-rtl-all reveals that the adddi vanishes between ud_dce and combine, but I can't see any significant differences in the input RTL to explain that. $ gcc -mgeneral-regs-only -O2 -fno-inline -o gen-test gen-test.c $ ./gen-test && echo success || echo fail fail $ gcc -O2 -fno-inline -o gen-test gen-test.c $ ./gen-test && echo success || echo fail success ---- unsigned char byte = 0; void set_bit(unsigned int bit, unsigned char value) { unsigned char mask = (unsigned char)(1 << (bit & 7)); if (!value) { byte &= (unsigned char)~mask; } else { byte |= mask; } } int main(int argc, char **argv) { set_bit(8, 1); set_bit(9, 1); return byte != 3; } ----
next reply other threads:[~2014-12-14 11:18 UTC|newest] Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top 2014-12-14 11:18 me at williamgrant dot id.au [this message] 2014-12-15 3:27 ` [Bug target/64304] " kugan at gcc dot gnu.org 2015-01-06 18:23 ` [Bug rtl-optimization/64304] " jiwang at gcc dot gnu.org 2015-01-09 13:48 ` jiwang at gcc dot gnu.org 2015-01-09 21:46 ` [Bug target/64304] " pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org 2015-01-19 14:14 ` jiwang at gcc dot gnu.org 2015-01-19 14:16 ` jiwang at gcc dot gnu.org 2015-05-05 15:50 ` fyang at gcc dot gnu.org 2015-05-05 15:59 ` fyang at gcc dot gnu.org
Reply instructions: You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email using any one of the following methods: * Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client, and reply-to-all from there: mbox Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style * Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to switches of git-send-email(1): git send-email \ --in-reply-to=bug-64304-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ \ --to=gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org \ --cc=gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org \ /path/to/YOUR_REPLY https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html * If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header via mailto: links, try the mailto: linkBe sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox; as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).