public inbox for gcc-bugs@sourceware.org help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* [Bug fortran/64321] New: -ffixed-line-length-none doesn't work
@ 2014-12-15 21:15 burnus at gcc dot gnu.org
2014-12-16 15:47 ` [Bug fortran/64321] " janus at gcc dot gnu.org
2014-12-16 16:13 ` burnus at gcc dot gnu.org
0 siblings, 2 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: burnus at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2014-12-15 21:15 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64321
Bug ID: 64321
Summary: -ffixed-line-length-none doesn't work
Product: gcc
Version: 5.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords: diagnostic, rejects-valid
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: fortran
Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
Reporter: burnus at gcc dot gnu.org
The following program consists of two lines:
print *,
'aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa'
end
With GCC 4.8 and 5, one gets the error:
print *, 'aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa
1
Error: Unterminated character constant beginning at (1)
And that's independent of -ffixed-line-length-none or -ffixed-line-length-150.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread* [Bug fortran/64321] -ffixed-line-length-none doesn't work 2014-12-15 21:15 [Bug fortran/64321] New: -ffixed-line-length-none doesn't work burnus at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2014-12-16 15:47 ` janus at gcc dot gnu.org 2014-12-16 16:13 ` burnus at gcc dot gnu.org 1 sibling, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread From: janus at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2014-12-16 15:47 UTC (permalink / raw) To: gcc-bugs https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64321 janus at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |janus at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #1 from janus at gcc dot gnu.org --- It actually works for me, at least when putting the test case into a .f file. Is it possibly that your file has an f90 extension (meaning it's actually free format)? Would it be a bad idea to introduce a flag like -fline-length-none, which sets the line length both for fixed and free format? ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
* [Bug fortran/64321] -ffixed-line-length-none doesn't work 2014-12-15 21:15 [Bug fortran/64321] New: -ffixed-line-length-none doesn't work burnus at gcc dot gnu.org 2014-12-16 15:47 ` [Bug fortran/64321] " janus at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2014-12-16 16:13 ` burnus at gcc dot gnu.org 1 sibling, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread From: burnus at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2014-12-16 16:13 UTC (permalink / raw) To: gcc-bugs https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64321 Tobias Burnus <burnus at gcc dot gnu.org> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|--- |WORKSFORME --- Comment #2 from Tobias Burnus <burnus at gcc dot gnu.org> --- Close as WORKSFORME. Yes, I seemingly had a .f90 file without -ffixed-form, when testing https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2014-12/msg01289.html - and while busy checking some other issues, I didn't closely inspect this patch. I do not see a real need for a unified option. ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2014-12-16 16:13 UTC | newest] Thread overview: 3+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed) -- links below jump to the message on this page -- 2014-12-15 21:15 [Bug fortran/64321] New: -ffixed-line-length-none doesn't work burnus at gcc dot gnu.org 2014-12-16 15:47 ` [Bug fortran/64321] " janus at gcc dot gnu.org 2014-12-16 16:13 ` burnus at gcc dot gnu.org
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox; as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).