public inbox for gcc-bugs@sourceware.org
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "ro at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug rtl-optimization/64341] New: [5 regression] ICE in expand_expr_addr_expr_1, at expr.c:7718
Date: Wed, 17 Dec 2014 15:15:00 -0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <bug-64341-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/> (raw)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64341

            Bug ID: 64341
           Summary: [5 regression] ICE in expand_expr_addr_expr_1, at
                    expr.c:7718
           Product: gcc
           Version: 5.0
            Status: UNCONFIRMED
          Severity: normal
          Priority: P3
         Component: rtl-optimization
          Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
          Reporter: ro at gcc dot gnu.org
                CC: ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org
              Host: sparc*-sun-solaris2.*
            Target: sparc*-sun-solaris2.*
             Build: sparc*-sun-solaris2.*

Since 20141021 (r216502), I see a the following ICE on 32-bit Solaris/SPARC:

FAIL: 21_strings/basic_string/modifiers/replace/wchar_t/4.cc (test for excess
errors)
WARNING: 21_strings/basic_string/modifiers/replace/wchar_t/4.cc compilation
failed to produce executable

Excess errors:
/vol/gcc/src/hg/trunk/local/libstdc++-v3/testsuite/21_strings/basic_string/modifiers/replace/wchar_t/4.cc:29:1:
internal compiler error: in expand_expr_addr_expr_1, at expr.c:7718
0x66fe7f expand_expr_addr_expr_1
        /vol/gcc/src/hg/trunk/local/gcc/expr.c:7718
0x66284b expand_expr_addr_expr
        /vol/gcc/src/hg/trunk/local/gcc/expr.c:7832
0x66284b expand_expr_real_1(tree_node*, rtx_def*, machine_mode,
expand_modifier, rtx_def**, bool)
        /vol/gcc/src/hg/trunk/local/gcc/expr.c:10706

0x66284b expand_expr_real_1(tree_node*, rtx_def*, machine_mode,
expand_modifier, rtx_def**, bool)
        /vol/gcc/src/hg/trunk/local/gcc/expr.c:10706
0x54a53f expand_normal
        /vol/gcc/src/hg/trunk/local/gcc/expr.h:305
0x54a53f precompute_register_parameters
        /vol/gcc/src/hg/trunk/local/gcc/calls.c:869
0x54a53f expand_call(tree_node*, rtx_def*, int)
        /vol/gcc/src/hg/trunk/local/gcc/calls.c:3119
0x6619b7 expand_expr_real_1(tree_node*, rtx_def*, machine_mode,
expand_modifier, rtx_def**, bool)
        /vol/gcc/src/hg/trunk/local/gcc/expr.c:10474
0x55e00b expand_expr
        /vol/gcc/src/hg/trunk/local/gcc/expr.h:299
0x55e00b expand_call_stmt
        /vol/gcc/src/hg/trunk/local/gcc/cfgexpand.c:2347
0x55e00b expand_gimple_stmt_1
        /vol/gcc/src/hg/trunk/local/gcc/cfgexpand.c:3293
0x55e00b expand_gimple_stmt
        /vol/gcc/src/hg/trunk/local/gcc/cfgexpand.c:3447
0x563883 expand_gimple_basic_block
        /vol/gcc/src/hg/trunk/local/gcc/cfgexpand.c:5280
0x565fdb execute
        /vol/gcc/src/hg/trunk/local/gcc/cfgexpand.c:5889

Since 20141030 (r216932), there's another failure with the same ICE, again only
for 32-bit:

FAIL: g++.dg/ipa/pr63587-2.C  -std=gnu++11 (internal compiler error)
FAIL: g++.dg/ipa/pr63587-2.C  -std=gnu++11 (test for excess errors)
FAIL: g++.dg/ipa/pr63587-2.C  -std=gnu++14 (internal compiler error)
FAIL: g++.dg/ipa/pr63587-2.C  -std=gnu++14 (test for excess errors)

Excess errors:
/vol/gcc/src/hg/trunk/local/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/ipa/pr63587-2.C:21:3: internal
compiler error: in expand_expr_addr_expr_1, at expr.c:7718
0x66fe7f expand_expr_addr_expr_1
        /vol/gcc/src/hg/trunk/local/gcc/expr.c:7718
0x66284b expand_expr_addr_expr
        /vol/gcc/src/hg/trunk/local/gcc/expr.c:7718
0x66284b expand_expr_addr_expr
        /vol/gcc/src/hg/trunk/local/gcc/expr.c:7832
0x66284b expand_expr_real_1(tree_node*, rtx_def*, machine_mode,
expand_modifier, rtx_def**, bool)
        /vol/gcc/src/hg/trunk/local/gcc/expr.c:10706
0x54a53f expand_normal
        /vol/gcc/src/hg/trunk/local/gcc/expr.h:305
0x54a53f precompute_register_parameters
        /vol/gcc/src/hg/trunk/local/gcc/calls.c:869
0x54a53f expand_call(tree_node*, rtx_def*, int)
        /vol/gcc/src/hg/trunk/local/gcc/calls.c:3119
0x6619b7 expand_expr_real_1(tree_node*, rtx_def*, machine_mode,
expand_modifier, rtx_def**, bool)
        /vol/gcc/src/hg/trunk/local/gcc/expr.c:10474
0x67043f store_expr_with_bounds(tree_node*, rtx_def*, int, bool, tree_node*)
        /vol/gcc/src/hg/trunk/local/gcc/expr.c:5365
0x678e37 expand_assignment(tree_node*, tree_node*, bool)
        /vol/gcc/src/hg/trunk/local/gcc/expr.c:5137
0x55d803 expand_call_stmt
        /vol/gcc/src/hg/trunk/local/gcc/cfgexpand.c:2345
0x55d803 expand_gimple_stmt_1
        /vol/gcc/src/hg/trunk/local/gcc/cfgexpand.c:3293
0x55d803 expand_gimple_stmt_1
        /vol/gcc/src/hg/trunk/local/gcc/cfgexpand.c:3293
0x55d803 expand_gimple_stmt
        /vol/gcc/src/hg/trunk/local/gcc/cfgexpand.c:3447
0x563883 expand_gimple_basic_block
        /vol/gcc/src/hg/trunk/local/gcc/cfgexpand.c:5280
0x565fdb execute
        /vol/gcc/src/hg/trunk/local/gcc/cfgexpand.c:5889

This might be a dup (or at least related) to PR rtl-optimization/64033.

  Rainer


             reply	other threads:[~2014-12-17 15:15 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2014-12-17 15:15 ro at gcc dot gnu.org [this message]
2014-12-17 15:16 ` [Bug rtl-optimization/64341] " ro at gcc dot gnu.org
2015-01-13 15:25 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
2015-01-20  9:49 ` ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld.DE
2015-01-20  9:50 ` ro at gcc dot gnu.org

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=bug-64341-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ \
    --to=gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org \
    --cc=gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).