public inbox for gcc-bugs@sourceware.org
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* [Bug target/64358] New: Wrong code for __int128 operations in powerpc64le
@ 2014-12-19 11:35 roger.ferrer at bsc dot es
2014-12-19 15:13 ` [Bug target/64358] " pthaugen at gcc dot gnu.org
` (4 more replies)
0 siblings, 5 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: roger.ferrer at bsc dot es @ 2014-12-19 11:35 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64358
Bug ID: 64358
Summary: Wrong code for __int128 operations in powerpc64le
Product: gcc
Version: 4.9.1
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: target
Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
Reporter: roger.ferrer at bsc dot es
Hi,
I'm observing a weird behaviour in PowerPC64 Little Endian that does not seem
to occur on other architectures supporting __int128. The following code, when
compiled with -O1 generates wrong output in gcc 4.9.1.
-- test.c
#include <stdio.h>
typedef unsigned __int128 uint128_t;
#define PRINT(value) \
{ union u { uint128_t i; unsigned long long l[2]; } _t = { .i = value }; \
fprintf(stderr, "%s => <%016llx, %016llx>\n", #value, _t.l[1],
_t.l[0]); }
__attribute__((noinline))
uint128_t get_int(uint128_t value, unsigned int num_bytes)
{
uint128_t mask = ~(uint128_t)0;
mask <<= (uint128_t)(8 * num_bytes); /* assuming 1 byte = 8 bits */
mask = ~mask;
value &= mask;
return value;
}
int main(int argc, char* argv[])
{
uint128_t x = 0;
x = get_int(10, /* num_bytes */ 1);
PRINT(x);
return 0;
}
-- end of test.c
The problem is still present in a recent version from the svn:
$ gcc -v
Using built-in specs.
COLLECT_GCC=/home/Computational/rferrer/gcc/install/bin/gcc
COLLECT_LTO_WRAPPER=/home/Computational/rferrer/gcc/install/libexec/gcc/powerpc64le-unknown-linux-gnu/5.0.0/lto-wrapper
Target: powerpc64le-unknown-linux-gnu
Configured with: ../gcc-src/configure
--prefix=/home/Computational/rferrer/gcc/install
--enable-languages=c,c++,fortran
--with-gmp=/home/Computational/rferrer/gcc/install
--with-mpfr=/home/Computational/rferrer/gcc/install
--with-mpc=/home/Computational/rferrer/gcc/install --enable-multiarch
--disable-multilib
Thread model: posix
gcc version 5.0.0 20141218 (experimental) (GCC)
$ make
gcc -O0 -o test.O0 test.c
./test.O0
x => <0000000000000000, 000000000000000a>
gcc -O1 -o test.O1 test.c
./test.O1
x => <ffffffffffffffff, ffffffffffffff00>
Kind regards,
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* [Bug target/64358] Wrong code for __int128 operations in powerpc64le
2014-12-19 11:35 [Bug target/64358] New: Wrong code for __int128 operations in powerpc64le roger.ferrer at bsc dot es
@ 2014-12-19 15:13 ` pthaugen at gcc dot gnu.org
2014-12-19 16:01 ` roger.ferrer at bsc dot es
` (3 subsequent siblings)
4 siblings, 0 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: pthaugen at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2014-12-19 15:13 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64358
Pat Haugen <pthaugen at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Target|powerpc64le |powerpc64le, powerpc64
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
Last reconfirmed| |2014-12-19
CC| |dje at gcc dot gnu.org
Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |pthaugen at gcc dot gnu.org
Ever confirmed|0 |1
--- Comment #1 from Pat Haugen <pthaugen at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
This occurs on powerpc64 Big Endian too and is fixed by a patch I just
submitted yesterday. Talk about timing...
https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2014-12/msg01585.html
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* [Bug target/64358] Wrong code for __int128 operations in powerpc64le
2014-12-19 11:35 [Bug target/64358] New: Wrong code for __int128 operations in powerpc64le roger.ferrer at bsc dot es
2014-12-19 15:13 ` [Bug target/64358] " pthaugen at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2014-12-19 16:01 ` roger.ferrer at bsc dot es
2014-12-20 15:37 ` segher at gcc dot gnu.org
` (2 subsequent siblings)
4 siblings, 0 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: roger.ferrer at bsc dot es @ 2014-12-19 16:01 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64358
--- Comment #2 from Roger Ferrer Ibanez <roger.ferrer at bsc dot es> ---
(In reply to Pat Haugen from comment #1)
> This occurs on powerpc64 Big Endian too and is fixed by a patch I just
> submitted yesterday. Talk about timing...
Fantastic
>
> https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2014-12/msg01585.html
I applied the patch in my tree and it fixes this issue.
Thanks a lot!
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* [Bug target/64358] Wrong code for __int128 operations in powerpc64le
2014-12-19 11:35 [Bug target/64358] New: Wrong code for __int128 operations in powerpc64le roger.ferrer at bsc dot es
2014-12-19 15:13 ` [Bug target/64358] " pthaugen at gcc dot gnu.org
2014-12-19 16:01 ` roger.ferrer at bsc dot es
@ 2014-12-20 15:37 ` segher at gcc dot gnu.org
2015-01-13 19:09 ` pthaugen at gcc dot gnu.org
2015-01-13 19:18 ` pthaugen at gcc dot gnu.org
4 siblings, 0 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: segher at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2014-12-20 15:37 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64358
--- Comment #3 from Segher Boessenkool <segher at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
Author: segher
Date: Sat Dec 20 15:37:06 2014
New Revision: 218989
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=218989&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR target/64358
* config/rs6000/rs6000.c (rs6000_split_logical_inner): Swap the
input operands if only the second is inverted.
* config/rs6000/rs6000.md (*boolc<mode>3_internal1 for BOOL_128):
Swap BOOL_REGS_OP1 and BOOL_REGS_OP2. Correct arguments to
rs6000_split_logical.
(*boolc<mode>3_internal2 for TI2): Swap operands[1] and operands[2].
Modified:
trunk/gcc/ChangeLog
trunk/gcc/config/rs6000/rs6000.c
trunk/gcc/config/rs6000/rs6000.md
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* [Bug target/64358] Wrong code for __int128 operations in powerpc64le
2014-12-19 11:35 [Bug target/64358] New: Wrong code for __int128 operations in powerpc64le roger.ferrer at bsc dot es
` (2 preceding siblings ...)
2014-12-20 15:37 ` segher at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2015-01-13 19:09 ` pthaugen at gcc dot gnu.org
2015-01-13 19:18 ` pthaugen at gcc dot gnu.org
4 siblings, 0 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: pthaugen at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2015-01-13 19:09 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64358
--- Comment #4 from Pat Haugen <pthaugen at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
Author: pthaugen
Date: Tue Jan 13 19:08:49 2015
New Revision: 219548
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=219548&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
Backport from mainline
2014-12-20 Segher Boessenkool <segher@kernel.crashing.org>
PR target/64358
* config/rs6000/rs6000.c (rs6000_split_logical_inner): Swap the
input operands if only the second is inverted.
* config/rs6000/rs6000.md (*boolc<mode>3_internal1 for BOOL_128):
Swap BOOL_REGS_OP1 and BOOL_REGS_OP2. Correct arguments to
rs6000_split_logical.
(*boolc<mode>3_internal2 for TI2): Swap operands[1] and operands[2].
Modified:
branches/gcc-4_8-branch/gcc/ChangeLog
branches/gcc-4_8-branch/gcc/config/rs6000/rs6000.c
branches/gcc-4_8-branch/gcc/config/rs6000/rs6000.md
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* [Bug target/64358] Wrong code for __int128 operations in powerpc64le
2014-12-19 11:35 [Bug target/64358] New: Wrong code for __int128 operations in powerpc64le roger.ferrer at bsc dot es
` (3 preceding siblings ...)
2015-01-13 19:09 ` pthaugen at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2015-01-13 19:18 ` pthaugen at gcc dot gnu.org
4 siblings, 0 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: pthaugen at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2015-01-13 19:18 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64358
--- Comment #5 from Pat Haugen <pthaugen at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
Author: pthaugen
Date: Tue Jan 13 19:17:42 2015
New Revision: 219551
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=219551&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
Backport from mainline
2014-12-20 Segher Boessenkool <segher@kernel.crashing.org>
PR target/64358
* config/rs6000/rs6000.c (rs6000_split_logical_inner): Swap the
input operands if only the second is inverted.
* config/rs6000/rs6000.md (*boolc<mode>3_internal1 for BOOL_128):
Swap BOOL_REGS_OP1 and BOOL_REGS_OP2. Correct arguments to
rs6000_split_logical.
(*boolc<mode>3_internal2 for TI2): Swap operands[1] and operands[2].
Modified:
branches/gcc-4_9-branch/gcc/ChangeLog
branches/gcc-4_9-branch/gcc/config/rs6000/rs6000.c
branches/gcc-4_9-branch/gcc/config/rs6000/rs6000.md
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2015-01-13 19:18 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2014-12-19 11:35 [Bug target/64358] New: Wrong code for __int128 operations in powerpc64le roger.ferrer at bsc dot es
2014-12-19 15:13 ` [Bug target/64358] " pthaugen at gcc dot gnu.org
2014-12-19 16:01 ` roger.ferrer at bsc dot es
2014-12-20 15:37 ` segher at gcc dot gnu.org
2015-01-13 19:09 ` pthaugen at gcc dot gnu.org
2015-01-13 19:18 ` pthaugen at gcc dot gnu.org
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).