* [Bug target/64368] [5 Regression] Several libstdc++ test failures on darwin after r218964.
2014-12-20 15:33 [Bug target/64368] New: [5 Regression] Several libstdc++ test failures on darwin after r218964 dominiq at lps dot ens.fr
@ 2014-12-20 15:37 ` dominiq at lps dot ens.fr
2014-12-20 15:39 ` dominiq at lps dot ens.fr
` (27 subsequent siblings)
28 siblings, 0 replies; 30+ messages in thread
From: dominiq at lps dot ens.fr @ 2014-12-20 15:37 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64368
Dominique d'Humieres <dominiq at lps dot ens.fr> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed| |2014-12-20
Ever confirmed|0 |1
--- Comment #1 from Dominique d'Humieres <dominiq at lps dot ens.fr> ---
See also https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-testresults/2014-12/msg02528.html for the
darwin specific failures and
https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-regression/2014-12/msg00774.html for the
mutex_extensions_neg.cc ones.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 30+ messages in thread* [Bug target/64368] [5 Regression] Several libstdc++ test failures on darwin after r218964.
2014-12-20 15:33 [Bug target/64368] New: [5 Regression] Several libstdc++ test failures on darwin after r218964 dominiq at lps dot ens.fr
2014-12-20 15:37 ` [Bug target/64368] " dominiq at lps dot ens.fr
@ 2014-12-20 15:39 ` dominiq at lps dot ens.fr
2014-12-20 15:47 ` fxcoudert at gcc dot gnu.org
` (26 subsequent siblings)
28 siblings, 0 replies; 30+ messages in thread
From: dominiq at lps dot ens.fr @ 2014-12-20 15:39 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64368
Dominique d'Humieres <dominiq at lps dot ens.fr> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
CC| |fxcoudert at gcc dot gnu.org,
| |howarth at bromo dot med.uc.edu,
| |iains at gcc dot gnu.org,
| |redi at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #2 from Dominique d'Humieres <dominiq at lps dot ens.fr> ---
I have forgotten the CC list.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 30+ messages in thread* [Bug target/64368] [5 Regression] Several libstdc++ test failures on darwin after r218964.
2014-12-20 15:33 [Bug target/64368] New: [5 Regression] Several libstdc++ test failures on darwin after r218964 dominiq at lps dot ens.fr
2014-12-20 15:37 ` [Bug target/64368] " dominiq at lps dot ens.fr
2014-12-20 15:39 ` dominiq at lps dot ens.fr
@ 2014-12-20 15:47 ` fxcoudert at gcc dot gnu.org
2014-12-20 16:00 ` dominiq at lps dot ens.fr
` (25 subsequent siblings)
28 siblings, 0 replies; 30+ messages in thread
From: fxcoudert at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2014-12-20 15:47 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64368
Francois-Xavier Coudert <fxcoudert at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
CC| |jwakely.gcc at gmail dot com
--- Comment #3 from Francois-Xavier Coudert <fxcoudert at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
Appeared between 218883 (works) and 218985 (fails) [I'm glad my nightly tester
is useful!]
Culprits are:
r218984 | redi | 2014-12-20 01:19:40 +0100 (Sat, 20 Dec 2014) | 4 lines
Fix duplicate symbol errors in Darwin bootstrap.
* src/c++98/locale-inst.cc (__add_grouping, __pad, __int_to_char):
Only compile for old ABI.
r218964 | redi | 2014-12-19 19:16:39 +0100 (Fri, 19 Dec 2014) | 183 lines
New std::string implementation.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 30+ messages in thread* [Bug target/64368] [5 Regression] Several libstdc++ test failures on darwin after r218964.
2014-12-20 15:33 [Bug target/64368] New: [5 Regression] Several libstdc++ test failures on darwin after r218964 dominiq at lps dot ens.fr
` (2 preceding siblings ...)
2014-12-20 15:47 ` fxcoudert at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2014-12-20 16:00 ` dominiq at lps dot ens.fr
2014-12-20 17:39 ` howarth at bromo dot med.uc.edu
` (24 subsequent siblings)
28 siblings, 0 replies; 30+ messages in thread
From: dominiq at lps dot ens.fr @ 2014-12-20 16:00 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64368
--- Comment #4 from Dominique d'Humieres <dominiq at lps dot ens.fr> ---
> [I'm glad my nightly tester is useful!]
Nightly testers would be extremely useful if people used to look at their
results!-(
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 30+ messages in thread* [Bug target/64368] [5 Regression] Several libstdc++ test failures on darwin after r218964.
2014-12-20 15:33 [Bug target/64368] New: [5 Regression] Several libstdc++ test failures on darwin after r218964 dominiq at lps dot ens.fr
` (3 preceding siblings ...)
2014-12-20 16:00 ` dominiq at lps dot ens.fr
@ 2014-12-20 17:39 ` howarth at bromo dot med.uc.edu
2014-12-29 2:23 ` hp at gcc dot gnu.org
` (23 subsequent siblings)
28 siblings, 0 replies; 30+ messages in thread
From: howarth at bromo dot med.uc.edu @ 2014-12-20 17:39 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64368
--- Comment #6 from howarth at bromo dot med.uc.edu ---
(In reply to howarth from comment #5)
Ignore that I misread the commit numbering.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 30+ messages in thread* [Bug target/64368] [5 Regression] Several libstdc++ test failures on darwin after r218964.
2014-12-20 15:33 [Bug target/64368] New: [5 Regression] Several libstdc++ test failures on darwin after r218964 dominiq at lps dot ens.fr
` (4 preceding siblings ...)
2014-12-20 17:39 ` howarth at bromo dot med.uc.edu
@ 2014-12-29 2:23 ` hp at gcc dot gnu.org
2014-12-29 2:51 ` [Bug target/64368] [5 Regression] Several libstdc++ test failures on darwin and others " hp at gcc dot gnu.org
` (22 subsequent siblings)
28 siblings, 0 replies; 30+ messages in thread
From: hp at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2014-12-29 2:23 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64368
Hans-Peter Nilsson <hp at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
CC| |hp at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #7 from Hans-Peter Nilsson <hp at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
cris-elf too, observed starting in r218951:218978 here, so I suggest not
hand-waving away our reports, in particular as they indicate pointer-dependent
bugs. I haven't investigated each commit, but looking at the "svn diff
-r218951:218978" a wild guess would be a bug in the rewrite-changes perhaps
related to_GLIBCXX_USE_WCHAR_T.
If you can't see it on your system, please run the test under valgrind.
The .log entries indicate bugs consistent with the previously quoted log
entries (i.e. some allocation bug):
PASS: 22_locale/locale/cons/6.cc (test for excess errors)
core: 4 byte misaligned read to address 0xa2ce236 at 0x45788
program stopped with signal 10 (User defined signal 1).
FAIL: 22_locale/locale/cons/6.cc execution test
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 30+ messages in thread* [Bug target/64368] [5 Regression] Several libstdc++ test failures on darwin and others after r218964.
2014-12-20 15:33 [Bug target/64368] New: [5 Regression] Several libstdc++ test failures on darwin after r218964 dominiq at lps dot ens.fr
` (5 preceding siblings ...)
2014-12-29 2:23 ` hp at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2014-12-29 2:51 ` hp at gcc dot gnu.org
2014-12-29 12:56 ` redi at gcc dot gnu.org
` (21 subsequent siblings)
28 siblings, 0 replies; 30+ messages in thread
From: hp at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2014-12-29 2:51 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64368
Hans-Peter Nilsson <hp at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Summary|[5 Regression] Several |[5 Regression] Several
|libstdc++ test failures on |libstdc++ test failures on
|darwin after r218964. |darwin and others after
| |r218964.
--- Comment #8 from Hans-Peter Nilsson <hp at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
BTW, the ext/profile/mutex_extensions_neg.cc errors were deliberately fixed in
r218988:218990.
Also fails on i386-unknown-freebsd10.1:
<https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-testresults/2014-12/msg03274.html> (unfortunately
no svn revision quoted but compare to
<https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-testresults/2014-12/msg02452.html>).
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 30+ messages in thread* [Bug target/64368] [5 Regression] Several libstdc++ test failures on darwin and others after r218964.
2014-12-20 15:33 [Bug target/64368] New: [5 Regression] Several libstdc++ test failures on darwin after r218964 dominiq at lps dot ens.fr
` (6 preceding siblings ...)
2014-12-29 2:51 ` [Bug target/64368] [5 Regression] Several libstdc++ test failures on darwin and others " hp at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2014-12-29 12:56 ` redi at gcc dot gnu.org
2014-12-29 14:15 ` hp at gcc dot gnu.org
` (20 subsequent siblings)
28 siblings, 0 replies; 30+ messages in thread
From: redi at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2014-12-29 12:56 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64368
--- Comment #9 from Jonathan Wakely <redi at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
Who is waving anything away? I've been fixing things for Darwin at all hours of
the day, while on vacation and while ill, so don't appreciate that comment.
I have run the years in valgrind and saw no problem on Linux.
Someone could always try debugging things themselves, even if just posting full
stack traces to this report.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 30+ messages in thread* [Bug target/64368] [5 Regression] Several libstdc++ test failures on darwin and others after r218964.
2014-12-20 15:33 [Bug target/64368] New: [5 Regression] Several libstdc++ test failures on darwin after r218964 dominiq at lps dot ens.fr
` (7 preceding siblings ...)
2014-12-29 12:56 ` redi at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2014-12-29 14:15 ` hp at gcc dot gnu.org
2014-12-29 14:48 ` hp at gcc dot gnu.org
` (19 subsequent siblings)
28 siblings, 0 replies; 30+ messages in thread
From: hp at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2014-12-29 14:15 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64368
--- Comment #10 from Hans-Peter Nilsson <hp at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
(In reply to Jonathan Wakely from comment #9)
> Who is waving anything away?
I wasn't referring to you. Apparently I was referring to a comment that was
supposed to be ignored.
> I've been fixing things for Darwin at all hours
> of the day, while on vacation and while ill, so don't appreciate that
> comment.
Sorry!
Your work and diligence is much appreciated.
Get well soon.
HNY.
> Someone could always try debugging things themselves, even if just posting full stack traces to this report.
"Bare-metal" simulator setup without gdb, unfortunately.
brgds, H-P
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 30+ messages in thread* [Bug target/64368] [5 Regression] Several libstdc++ test failures on darwin and others after r218964.
2014-12-20 15:33 [Bug target/64368] New: [5 Regression] Several libstdc++ test failures on darwin after r218964 dominiq at lps dot ens.fr
` (8 preceding siblings ...)
2014-12-29 14:15 ` hp at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2014-12-29 14:48 ` hp at gcc dot gnu.org
2015-01-09 11:20 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
` (18 subsequent siblings)
28 siblings, 0 replies; 30+ messages in thread
From: hp at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2014-12-29 14:48 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64368
--- Comment #11 from Hans-Peter Nilsson <hp at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
Created attachment 34344
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=34344&action=edit
Call-trace for testsuite/22_locale/locale/cons/6.cc on cris-elf, a "newlib
target"
Plain execution trace from 22_locale/locale/cons/6.cc compiled with default
testsuite options, so inlining and whatever effects apply.
In the trace, lines with ">" denotes function calls, "<" are returns, with
indentation supposed to show the call-level. The first four columns are the
hexadecimal values of the first four parameters as applicable (actually,
"parameter registers" but none are larger than 32 bits here, so same thing) /
ditto return values, padded with random contents. (The fifth column is
cumulative execution times at each call-level.)
By a quick glance it seems the freed-but-not-allocated pointer, 0x5e23a, is
also the argument to the last call to strlen.
HTH.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 30+ messages in thread* [Bug target/64368] [5 Regression] Several libstdc++ test failures on darwin and others after r218964.
2014-12-20 15:33 [Bug target/64368] New: [5 Regression] Several libstdc++ test failures on darwin after r218964 dominiq at lps dot ens.fr
` (9 preceding siblings ...)
2014-12-29 14:48 ` hp at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2015-01-09 11:20 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
2015-01-12 7:26 ` izamyatin at gmail dot com
` (17 subsequent siblings)
28 siblings, 0 replies; 30+ messages in thread
From: rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2015-01-09 11:20 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64368
Richard Biener <rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Target Milestone|--- |5.0
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 30+ messages in thread* [Bug target/64368] [5 Regression] Several libstdc++ test failures on darwin and others after r218964.
2014-12-20 15:33 [Bug target/64368] New: [5 Regression] Several libstdc++ test failures on darwin after r218964 dominiq at lps dot ens.fr
` (10 preceding siblings ...)
2015-01-09 11:20 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2015-01-12 7:26 ` izamyatin at gmail dot com
2015-01-21 11:13 ` ro at gcc dot gnu.org
` (16 subsequent siblings)
28 siblings, 0 replies; 30+ messages in thread
From: izamyatin at gmail dot com @ 2015-01-12 7:26 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64368
Igor Zamyatin <izamyatin at gmail dot com> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
CC| |izamyatin at gmail dot com
--- Comment #13 from Igor Zamyatin <izamyatin at gmail dot com> ---
Hi!
Any plans on fixing this?
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 30+ messages in thread* [Bug target/64368] [5 Regression] Several libstdc++ test failures on darwin and others after r218964.
2014-12-20 15:33 [Bug target/64368] New: [5 Regression] Several libstdc++ test failures on darwin after r218964 dominiq at lps dot ens.fr
` (11 preceding siblings ...)
2015-01-12 7:26 ` izamyatin at gmail dot com
@ 2015-01-21 11:13 ` ro at gcc dot gnu.org
2015-01-21 15:03 ` [Bug target/64368] [5 Regression] Several libstdc++ test failures on non-linux platforms " dominiq at lps dot ens.fr
` (15 subsequent siblings)
28 siblings, 0 replies; 30+ messages in thread
From: ro at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2015-01-21 11:13 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64368
Rainer Orth <ro at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
CC| |ro at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #14 from Rainer Orth <ro at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
I've just confirmed that r218964 is also the cuprit for the (considerably
smaller)
set of 64-bit testsuite failures seen on Solaris (both SPARC and x86):
FAIL: 22_locale/num_get/get/char/37958.cc execution test
FAIL: 22_locale/num_get/get/wchar_t/23953.cc execution test
FAIL: 22_locale/num_get/get/wchar_t/37958.cc execution test
FAIL: 22_locale/num_put/put/char/23953.cc execution test
FAIL: 22_locale/num_put/put/char/38196.cc execution test
FAIL: 22_locale/num_put/put/wchar_t/23953.cc execution test
FAIL: 22_locale/num_put/put/wchar_t/38196.cc execution test
FAIL: 27_io/basic_ostream/inserters_arithmetic/char/1.cc execution test
FAIL: 27_io/basic_ostream/inserters_arithmetic/wchar_t/1.cc execution test
The first one e.g. is a SEGV:
Program received signal SIGSEGV, Segmentation fault.
[Switching to Thread 1 (LWP 1)]
0xffff80ffbf4b2482 in realfree () from /lib/64/libc.so.1
(gdb) where
#0 0xffff80ffbf4b2482 in realfree () from /lib/64/libc.so.1
#1 0xffff80ffbf4b2b70 in _free_unlocked () from /lib/64/libc.so.1
#2 0xffff80ffbf4b2acd in free () from /lib/64/libc.so.1
#3 0xffff80fcc0763a3f in std::__numpunct_cache<char>::~__numpunct_cache (
this=0x419f50, __in_chrg=<optimized out>)
at
/var/gcc/regression/trunk/11-gcc-gas/build/i386-pc-solaris2.11/amd64/libstdc++-v3/include/bits/locale_facets.h:1623
#4 0xffff80fcc0763a71 in std::__numpunct_cache<char>::~__numpunct_cache (
this=0x419f50, __in_chrg=<optimized out>)
at
/var/gcc/regression/trunk/11-gcc-gas/build/i386-pc-solaris2.11/amd64/libstdc++-v3/include/bits/locale_facets.h:1626
#5 0xffff80fcc07ffc37 in std::numpunct<char>::~numpunct (this=0x41a000,
__in_chrg=<optimized out>) at numeric_members_cow.cc:66
#6 0xffff80fcc08109dd in ~numpunct_shim (this=0x41a000,
__in_chrg=<optimized out>)
at
/vol/gcc/src/hg/trunk/local/libstdc++-v3/src/c++11/cxx11-shim_facets.cc:242
#7 std::__facet_shims::(anonymous
namespace)::numpunct_shim<char>::~numpunct_shim (this=0x41a000,
__in_chrg=<optimized out>)
at
/vol/gcc/src/hg/trunk/local/libstdc++-v3/src/c++11/cxx11-shim_facets.cc:242
#8 0xffff80fcc07f51ab in std::locale::_Impl::~_Impl() ()
from ../../../amd64/libstdc++-v3/src/.libs/libstdc++.so.6
#9 0xffff80fcc07f53e3 in std::locale::~locale() ()
from ../../../amd64/libstdc++-v3/src/.libs/libstdc++.so.6
#10 0x0000000000404506 in ~basic_ios (this=0xffff80ffbfffef88,
__in_chrg=<optimized out>)
at
/var/gcc/regression/trunk/11-gcc-gas/build/i386-pc-solaris2.11/amd64/libstdc++-v3/include/bits/basic_ios.h:282
#11 ~basic_istringstream (this=0xffff80ffbfffef10, __in_chrg=<optimized out>,
__vtt_parm=<optimized out>)
at
/var/gcc/regression/trunk/11-gcc-gas/build/i386-pc-solaris2.11/amd64/libstdc++-v3/include/sstream:433
#12 test01 ()
at
/vol/gcc/src/hg/trunk/local/libstdc++-v3/testsuite/22_locale/num_get/get/char/23953.cc:75
#13 0x00000000004047e9 in main ()
at
/vol/gcc/src/hg/trunk/local/libstdc++-v3/testsuite/22_locale/num_get/get/char/23953.cc:80
Rainer
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 30+ messages in thread* [Bug target/64368] [5 Regression] Several libstdc++ test failures on non-linux platforms after r218964.
2014-12-20 15:33 [Bug target/64368] New: [5 Regression] Several libstdc++ test failures on darwin after r218964 dominiq at lps dot ens.fr
` (12 preceding siblings ...)
2015-01-21 11:13 ` ro at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2015-01-21 15:03 ` dominiq at lps dot ens.fr
2015-01-21 16:32 ` redi at gcc dot gnu.org
` (14 subsequent siblings)
28 siblings, 0 replies; 30+ messages in thread
From: dominiq at lps dot ens.fr @ 2015-01-21 15:03 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64368
Dominique d'Humieres <dominiq at lps dot ens.fr> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Summary|[5 Regression] Several |[5 Regression] Several
|libstdc++ test failures on |libstdc++ test failures on
|darwin and others after |non-linux platforms after
|r218964. |r218964.
--- Comment #15 from Dominique d'Humieres <dominiq at lps dot ens.fr> ---
> I've just confirmed that r218964 is also the cuprit for the
> (considerably smaller) set of 64-bit testsuite failures seen
> on Solaris (both SPARC and x86):
Some are also seen on hppa2.0w-hp-hpux11.11, see
https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-testresults/2015-01/msg02304.html:
FAIL: 22_locale/conversions/string/2.cc execution test
FAIL: 23_containers/unordered_map/requirements/explicit_instantiation/2.cc
(test for excess errors)
FAIL: 23_containers/unordered_map/requirements/explicit_instantiation/4.cc
(test for excess errors)
FAIL: 23_containers/vector/ext_pointer/types/2.cc execution test
FAIL: 30_threads/shared_lock/requirements/explicit_instantiation.cc (test for
excess errors)
FAIL: 30_threads/shared_lock/requirements/typedefs.cc (test for excess errors)
FAIL: 30_threads/shared_timed_mutex/requirements/standard_layout.cc (test for
excess errors)
FAIL: experimental/feat-cxx14.cc (test for excess errors)
Note that the last failures belong to another PR: they come from a later commit
and I see several of them on darwin (see FX tests). I have no inclination to
open a PR for them as long as the PRs I open are rotting for ever.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 30+ messages in thread* [Bug target/64368] [5 Regression] Several libstdc++ test failures on non-linux platforms after r218964.
2014-12-20 15:33 [Bug target/64368] New: [5 Regression] Several libstdc++ test failures on darwin after r218964 dominiq at lps dot ens.fr
` (13 preceding siblings ...)
2015-01-21 15:03 ` [Bug target/64368] [5 Regression] Several libstdc++ test failures on non-linux platforms " dominiq at lps dot ens.fr
@ 2015-01-21 16:32 ` redi at gcc dot gnu.org
2015-01-24 20:38 ` howarth at bromo dot med.uc.edu
` (13 subsequent siblings)
28 siblings, 0 replies; 30+ messages in thread
From: redi at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2015-01-21 16:32 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64368
--- Comment #16 from Jonathan Wakely <redi at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
(In reply to Dominique d'Humieres from comment #15)
> Note that the last failures belong to another PR: they come from a later
> commit and I see several of them on darwin (see FX tests). I have no
> inclination to open a PR for them as long as the PRs I open are rotting for
> ever.
This PR is a month old today, hardly forever. I'm going to fix it.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 30+ messages in thread* [Bug target/64368] [5 Regression] Several libstdc++ test failures on non-linux platforms after r218964.
2014-12-20 15:33 [Bug target/64368] New: [5 Regression] Several libstdc++ test failures on darwin after r218964 dominiq at lps dot ens.fr
` (14 preceding siblings ...)
2015-01-21 16:32 ` redi at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2015-01-24 20:38 ` howarth at bromo dot med.uc.edu
2015-01-26 12:33 ` redi at gcc dot gnu.org
` (12 subsequent siblings)
28 siblings, 0 replies; 30+ messages in thread
From: howarth at bromo dot med.uc.edu @ 2015-01-24 20:38 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64368
--- Comment #17 from howarth at bromo dot med.uc.edu ---
For the failure of the 22_locale/locale/cons/6.cc execution test on darwin14,
it traces as...
% fsf-gdb ./11.exe
GNU gdb (GDB) 7.8.2
Copyright (C) 2014 Free Software Foundation, Inc.
License GPLv3+: GNU GPL version 3 or later <http://gnu.org/licenses/gpl.html>
This is free software: you are free to change and redistribute it.
There is NO WARRANTY, to the extent permitted by law. Type "show copying"
and "show warranty" for details.
This GDB was configured as "x86_64-apple-darwin14.1.0".
Type "show configuration" for configuration details.
For bug reporting instructions, please see:
<http://www.gnu.org/software/gdb/bugs/>.
Find the GDB manual and other documentation resources online at:
<http://www.gnu.org/software/gdb/documentation/>.
For help, type "help".
Type "apropos word" to search for commands related to "word"...
Reading symbols from ./11.exe...Reading symbols from
/sw/src/fink.build/gcc50-5.0.0-1000/darwin_objdir/x86_64-apple-darwin14.1.0/libstdc++-v3/testsuite/11.exe.dSYM/Contents/Resources/DWARF/11.exe...done.
done.
(gdb) break main
Breakpoint 1 at 0x3860: file
/sw/src/fink.build/gcc50-5.0.0-1000/gcc-5-20150124/libstdc++-v3/testsuite/22_locale/num_get/get/char/11.cc,
line 104.
(gdb) r
Starting program:
/sw/src/fink.build/gcc50-5.0.0-1000/darwin_objdir/x86_64-apple-darwin14.1.0/libstdc++-v3/testsuite/11.exe
warning: Could not open OSO archive file
"/BinaryCache/corecrypto/corecrypto-233.1.2~26/Symbols/BuiltProducts/libcorecrypto_static.a"
warning:
`/BinaryCache/coreTLS/coreTLS-35.1.2~2/Objects/coretls.build/coretls.build/Objects-normal/i386/system_coretls_vers.o':
can't open to read symbols: No such file or directory.
warning: Could not open OSO archive file
"/BinaryCache/coreTLS/coreTLS-35.1.2~2/Symbols/BuiltProducts/libcoretls_ciphersuites.a"
warning: Could not open OSO archive file
"/BinaryCache/coreTLS/coreTLS-35.1.2~2/Symbols/BuiltProducts/libcoretls_handshake.a"
warning: Could not open OSO archive file
"/BinaryCache/coreTLS/coreTLS-35.1.2~2/Symbols/BuiltProducts/libcoretls_record.a"
warning: Could not open OSO archive file
"/BinaryCache/coreTLS/coreTLS-35.1.2~2/Symbols/BuiltProducts/libcoretls_stream_parser.a"
Breakpoint 1, main () at
/sw/src/fink.build/gcc50-5.0.0-1000/gcc-5-20150124/libstdc++-v3/testsuite/22_locale/num_get/get/char/11.cc:104
104 {
(gdb) s
105 test01();
(gdb) s
test01 () at
/sw/src/fink.build/gcc50-5.0.0-1000/darwin_objdir/x86_64-apple-darwin14.1.0/i386/libstdc++-v3/include/bits/basic_ios.h:462
462 _M_streambuf(0), _M_ctype(0), _M_num_put(0), _M_num_get(0)
(gdb) s
40 {
(gdb) s
462 _M_streambuf(0), _M_ctype(0), _M_num_put(0), _M_num_get(0)
(gdb) s
40 {
(gdb) s
462 _M_streambuf(0), _M_ctype(0), _M_num_put(0), _M_num_get(0)
(gdb) s
warning: (Internal error: pc 0x0 in read in psymtab, but not in symtab.)
warning: (Internal error: pc 0x0 in read in psymtab, but not in symtab.)
warning: (Internal error: pc 0x0 in read in psymtab, but not in symtab.)
warning: (Internal error: pc 0x0 in read in psymtab, but not in symtab.)
warning: (Internal error: pc 0x0 in read in psymtab, but not in symtab.)
warning: (Internal error: pc 0x0 in read in psymtab, but not in symtab.)
0x94e20420 in dyld_stub_binder () from /usr/lib/system/libdyld.dylib
(gdb) s
Single stepping until exit from function dyld_stub_binder,
which has no line number information.
warning: (Internal error: pc 0x0 in read in psymtab, but not in symtab.)
warning: (Internal error: pc 0x0 in read in psymtab, but not in symtab.)
0x94e20440 in misaligned_stack_error_ () from /usr/lib/system/libdyld.dylib
(gdb) s
Single stepping until exit from function misaligned_stack_error_,
which has no line number information.
warning: (Internal error: pc 0x0 in read in psymtab, but not in symtab.)
warning: (Internal error: pc 0x0 in read in psymtab, but not in symtab.)
0x94e20458 in dyld_stub_binder_ () from /usr/lib/system/libdyld.dylib
(gdb) s
Single stepping until exit from function dyld_stub_binder_,
which has no line number information.
std::ios_base::ios_base (this=0xbffff49c) at
../../../../../../gcc-5-20150124/libstdc++-v3/src/c++11/ios.cc:76
76 ios_base::ios_base() throw()
(gdb) s
11.exe(40298,0xa07ed1d4) malloc: *** error for object 0xc5a1e: pointer being
freed was not allocated
*** set a breakpoint in malloc_error_break to debug
Program received signal SIGABRT, Aborted.
0x94e3c69a in __pthread_kill () from /usr/lib/system/libsystem_kernel.dylib
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 30+ messages in thread* [Bug target/64368] [5 Regression] Several libstdc++ test failures on non-linux platforms after r218964.
2014-12-20 15:33 [Bug target/64368] New: [5 Regression] Several libstdc++ test failures on darwin after r218964 dominiq at lps dot ens.fr
` (15 preceding siblings ...)
2015-01-24 20:38 ` howarth at bromo dot med.uc.edu
@ 2015-01-26 12:33 ` redi at gcc dot gnu.org
2015-01-26 23:43 ` redi at gcc dot gnu.org
` (11 subsequent siblings)
28 siblings, 0 replies; 30+ messages in thread
From: redi at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2015-01-26 12:33 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64368
Jonathan Wakely <redi at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |redi at gcc dot gnu.org
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 30+ messages in thread* [Bug target/64368] [5 Regression] Several libstdc++ test failures on non-linux platforms after r218964.
2014-12-20 15:33 [Bug target/64368] New: [5 Regression] Several libstdc++ test failures on darwin after r218964 dominiq at lps dot ens.fr
` (16 preceding siblings ...)
2015-01-26 12:33 ` redi at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2015-01-26 23:43 ` redi at gcc dot gnu.org
2015-01-26 23:44 ` redi at gcc dot gnu.org
` (10 subsequent siblings)
28 siblings, 0 replies; 30+ messages in thread
From: redi at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2015-01-26 23:43 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64368
--- Comment #18 from Jonathan Wakely <redi at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
Author: redi
Date: Mon Jan 26 23:42:39 2015
New Revision: 220143
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=220143&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR libstdc++/64368
* config/locale/gnu/numeric_members.cc (numpunct<char>::~numpunct(),
numpunct<wchar_t>::~numpunct()): Do not set _M_data->_M_grouping.
* src/c++11/cxx11-shim_facets.cc (numpunct_shim): Remove _M_grouping
and use cache's _M_grouping field.
(__numpunct_fill_cache): Likewise.
(__moneypunct_fill_cache): Improve comments.
Modified:
trunk/libstdc++-v3/ChangeLog
trunk/libstdc++-v3/config/locale/gnu/numeric_members.cc
trunk/libstdc++-v3/src/c++11/cxx11-shim_facets.cc
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 30+ messages in thread* [Bug target/64368] [5 Regression] Several libstdc++ test failures on non-linux platforms after r218964.
2014-12-20 15:33 [Bug target/64368] New: [5 Regression] Several libstdc++ test failures on darwin after r218964 dominiq at lps dot ens.fr
` (17 preceding siblings ...)
2015-01-26 23:43 ` redi at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2015-01-26 23:44 ` redi at gcc dot gnu.org
2015-01-27 5:06 ` howarth at bromo dot med.uc.edu
` (9 subsequent siblings)
28 siblings, 0 replies; 30+ messages in thread
From: redi at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2015-01-26 23:44 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64368
--- Comment #19 from Jonathan Wakely <redi at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
r220143 should fix a lot of these failures, I'll check the testresults to see
what remains.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 30+ messages in thread* [Bug target/64368] [5 Regression] Several libstdc++ test failures on non-linux platforms after r218964.
2014-12-20 15:33 [Bug target/64368] New: [5 Regression] Several libstdc++ test failures on darwin after r218964 dominiq at lps dot ens.fr
` (18 preceding siblings ...)
2015-01-26 23:44 ` redi at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2015-01-27 5:06 ` howarth at bromo dot med.uc.edu
2015-01-27 11:05 ` dominiq at lps dot ens.fr
` (8 subsequent siblings)
28 siblings, 0 replies; 30+ messages in thread
From: howarth at bromo dot med.uc.edu @ 2015-01-27 5:06 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64368
--- Comment #20 from howarth at bromo dot med.uc.edu ---
(In reply to Jonathan Wakely from comment #19)
> r220143 should fix a lot of these failures, I'll check the testresults to
> see what remains.
On x86_64-apple-darwin14, the failures are now reduced to...
FAIL: 22_locale/conversions/string/2.cc execution test
FAIL: 23_containers/unordered_map/requirements/explicit_instantiation/2.cc
(test for excess errors)
FAIL: 23_containers/unordered_map/requirements/explicit_instantiation/4.cc
(test for excess errors)
FAIL: 30_threads/shared_lock/cons/1.cc (test for excess errors)
FAIL: 30_threads/shared_lock/cons/2.cc (test for excess errors)
FAIL: 30_threads/shared_lock/cons/3.cc (test for excess errors)
FAIL: 30_threads/shared_lock/cons/4.cc (test for excess errors)
FAIL: 30_threads/shared_lock/locking/1.cc (test for excess errors)
FAIL: 30_threads/shared_lock/locking/2.cc (test for excess errors)
FAIL: 30_threads/shared_lock/modifiers/1.cc (test for excess errors)
FAIL: 30_threads/shared_lock/modifiers/2.cc (test for excess errors)
FAIL: 30_threads/shared_lock/requirements/explicit_instantiation.cc (test for
excess errors)
FAIL: 30_threads/shared_lock/requirements/typedefs.cc (test for excess errors)
FAIL: 30_threads/shared_timed_mutex/cons/1.cc (test for excess errors)
FAIL: 30_threads/shared_timed_mutex/requirements/standard_layout.cc (test for
excess errors)
FAIL: 30_threads/shared_timed_mutex/try_lock/1.cc (test for excess errors)
FAIL: 30_threads/shared_timed_mutex/try_lock/2.cc (test for excess errors)
FAIL: experimental/feat-cxx14.cc (test for excess errors)
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 30+ messages in thread* [Bug target/64368] [5 Regression] Several libstdc++ test failures on non-linux platforms after r218964.
2014-12-20 15:33 [Bug target/64368] New: [5 Regression] Several libstdc++ test failures on darwin after r218964 dominiq at lps dot ens.fr
` (19 preceding siblings ...)
2015-01-27 5:06 ` howarth at bromo dot med.uc.edu
@ 2015-01-27 11:05 ` dominiq at lps dot ens.fr
2015-01-27 11:13 ` redi at gcc dot gnu.org
` (7 subsequent siblings)
28 siblings, 0 replies; 30+ messages in thread
From: dominiq at lps dot ens.fr @ 2015-01-27 11:05 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64368
--- Comment #21 from Dominique d'Humieres <dominiq at lps dot ens.fr> ---
> On x86_64-apple-darwin14, the failures are now reduced to...
> FAIL: 22_locale/conversions/string/2.cc execution test
> FAIL: 23_containers/unordered_map/requirements/explicit_instantiation/2.cc
> (test for excess errors)
> FAIL: 23_containers/unordered_map/requirements/explicit_instantiation/4.cc
> (test for excess errors)
> FAIL: 30_threads/shared_lock/cons/1.cc (test for excess errors)
> ...
Confirmed, thanks for the fix. The first failure is covered by pr64797, the
23_containers/* failures are covered by pr64813, and I'll open a new PR for the
remaining ones ASAP. I am waiting for feedback from the other platforms before
closing the PR as FIXED.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 30+ messages in thread* [Bug target/64368] [5 Regression] Several libstdc++ test failures on non-linux platforms after r218964.
2014-12-20 15:33 [Bug target/64368] New: [5 Regression] Several libstdc++ test failures on darwin after r218964 dominiq at lps dot ens.fr
` (20 preceding siblings ...)
2015-01-27 11:05 ` dominiq at lps dot ens.fr
@ 2015-01-27 11:13 ` redi at gcc dot gnu.org
2015-01-27 12:23 ` dominiq at lps dot ens.fr
` (6 subsequent siblings)
28 siblings, 0 replies; 30+ messages in thread
From: redi at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2015-01-27 11:13 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64368
--- Comment #22 from Jonathan Wakely <redi at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
(In reply to howarth from comment #20)
> On x86_64-apple-darwin14, the failures are now reduced to...
>
> FAIL: 22_locale/conversions/string/2.cc execution test
PR 64797
> FAIL: 23_containers/unordered_map/requirements/explicit_instantiation/2.cc
> (test for excess errors)
> FAIL: 23_containers/unordered_map/requirements/explicit_instantiation/4.cc
> (test for excess errors)
PR 64813
> FAIL: 30_threads/shared_lock/cons/1.cc (test for excess errors)
> FAIL: 30_threads/shared_lock/cons/2.cc (test for excess errors)
> FAIL: 30_threads/shared_lock/cons/3.cc (test for excess errors)
> FAIL: 30_threads/shared_lock/cons/4.cc (test for excess errors)
> FAIL: 30_threads/shared_lock/locking/1.cc (test for excess errors)
> FAIL: 30_threads/shared_lock/locking/2.cc (test for excess errors)
> FAIL: 30_threads/shared_lock/modifiers/1.cc (test for excess errors)
> FAIL: 30_threads/shared_lock/modifiers/2.cc (test for excess errors)
> FAIL: 30_threads/shared_lock/requirements/explicit_instantiation.cc (test
> for excess errors)
> FAIL: 30_threads/shared_lock/requirements/typedefs.cc (test for excess
> errors)
> FAIL: 30_threads/shared_timed_mutex/cons/1.cc (test for excess errors)
> FAIL: 30_threads/shared_timed_mutex/requirements/standard_layout.cc (test
> for excess errors)
> FAIL: 30_threads/shared_timed_mutex/try_lock/1.cc (test for excess errors)
> FAIL: 30_threads/shared_timed_mutex/try_lock/2.cc (test for excess errors)
Fixed by r220161
> FAIL: experimental/feat-cxx14.cc (test for excess errors)
Maybe also fixed by r220161
--- Comment #23 from Jonathan Wakely <redi at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
Author: redi
Date: Tue Jan 27 11:12:04 2015
New Revision: 220161
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=220161&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR libstdc++/64368
* include/std/shared_mutex (shared_timed_mutex::try_lock_for,
shared_timed_mutex::try_lock_until): Only define when POSIX thread
timeouts option is supported.
(shared_timed_mutex::try_shared_lock_for,
shared_timed_mutex::try_shared_lock_until): Likewise.
Modified:
trunk/libstdc++-v3/ChangeLog
trunk/libstdc++-v3/include/std/shared_mutex
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 30+ messages in thread* [Bug target/64368] [5 Regression] Several libstdc++ test failures on non-linux platforms after r218964.
2014-12-20 15:33 [Bug target/64368] New: [5 Regression] Several libstdc++ test failures on darwin after r218964 dominiq at lps dot ens.fr
` (21 preceding siblings ...)
2015-01-27 11:13 ` redi at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2015-01-27 12:23 ` dominiq at lps dot ens.fr
2015-01-27 13:13 ` redi at gcc dot gnu.org
` (5 subsequent siblings)
28 siblings, 0 replies; 30+ messages in thread
From: dominiq at lps dot ens.fr @ 2015-01-27 12:23 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64368
--- Comment #24 from Dominique d'Humieres <dominiq at lps dot ens.fr> ---
> > ...
> > FAIL: 30_threads/shared_timed_mutex/try_lock/2.cc (test for excess errors)
>
> Fixed by r220161
Confirmed. PR fixed before being opened!-)
> > FAIL: experimental/feat-cxx14.cc (test for excess errors)
>
> Maybe also fixed by r220161
Yes. Remaining after r220161 PR 64797 and PR 64813.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 30+ messages in thread* [Bug target/64368] [5 Regression] Several libstdc++ test failures on non-linux platforms after r218964.
2014-12-20 15:33 [Bug target/64368] New: [5 Regression] Several libstdc++ test failures on darwin after r218964 dominiq at lps dot ens.fr
` (22 preceding siblings ...)
2015-01-27 12:23 ` dominiq at lps dot ens.fr
@ 2015-01-27 13:13 ` redi at gcc dot gnu.org
2015-01-27 14:54 ` hp at gcc dot gnu.org
` (4 subsequent siblings)
28 siblings, 0 replies; 30+ messages in thread
From: redi at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2015-01-27 13:13 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64368
--- Comment #25 from Jonathan Wakely <redi at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
Great, thanks for confirming it. As you say, let's leave this open for now in
case HP or Rainer still sees some of these failures.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 30+ messages in thread* [Bug target/64368] [5 Regression] Several libstdc++ test failures on non-linux platforms after r218964.
2014-12-20 15:33 [Bug target/64368] New: [5 Regression] Several libstdc++ test failures on darwin after r218964 dominiq at lps dot ens.fr
` (23 preceding siblings ...)
2015-01-27 13:13 ` redi at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2015-01-27 14:54 ` hp at gcc dot gnu.org
2015-01-27 21:11 ` andreast at gcc dot gnu.org
` (3 subsequent siblings)
28 siblings, 0 replies; 30+ messages in thread
From: hp at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2015-01-27 14:54 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64368
--- Comment #26 from Hans-Peter Nilsson <hp at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
(In reply to Jonathan Wakely from comment #25)
> Great, thanks for confirming it. As you say, let's leave this open for now
> in case HP or Rainer still sees some of these failures.
JFTR, for cris-elf at r220153, my autotester is now down to the following
regressions since the start of the epoch (11 years ago):
gcc.sum gcc.dg/tls/alias-1.c
libstdc++.sum 28_regex/traits/char/isctype.cc
libstdc++.sum 28_regex/traits/wchar_t/isctype.cc
(all covered by other PR:s, the last two may be on your short list :-)
Thanks!
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 30+ messages in thread* [Bug target/64368] [5 Regression] Several libstdc++ test failures on non-linux platforms after r218964.
2014-12-20 15:33 [Bug target/64368] New: [5 Regression] Several libstdc++ test failures on darwin after r218964 dominiq at lps dot ens.fr
` (24 preceding siblings ...)
2015-01-27 14:54 ` hp at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2015-01-27 21:11 ` andreast at gcc dot gnu.org
2015-01-28 0:48 ` redi at gcc dot gnu.org
` (2 subsequent siblings)
28 siblings, 0 replies; 30+ messages in thread
From: andreast at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2015-01-27 21:11 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64368
--- Comment #27 from Andreas Tobler <andreast at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
FreeBSD/amd64 is back to normal too, thanks!
https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-testresults/2015-01/msg03141.html
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 30+ messages in thread* [Bug target/64368] [5 Regression] Several libstdc++ test failures on non-linux platforms after r218964.
2014-12-20 15:33 [Bug target/64368] New: [5 Regression] Several libstdc++ test failures on darwin after r218964 dominiq at lps dot ens.fr
` (25 preceding siblings ...)
2015-01-27 21:11 ` andreast at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2015-01-28 0:48 ` redi at gcc dot gnu.org
2015-01-28 3:32 ` howarth at bromo dot med.uc.edu
2015-01-28 9:46 ` ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld.DE
28 siblings, 0 replies; 30+ messages in thread
From: redi at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2015-01-28 0:48 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64368
Jonathan Wakely <redi at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|ASSIGNED |RESOLVED
Resolution|--- |FIXED
--- Comment #28 from Jonathan Wakely <redi at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
Let's close this then, and I'll deal with the PRs for the remaining failures.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 30+ messages in thread* [Bug target/64368] [5 Regression] Several libstdc++ test failures on non-linux platforms after r218964.
2014-12-20 15:33 [Bug target/64368] New: [5 Regression] Several libstdc++ test failures on darwin after r218964 dominiq at lps dot ens.fr
` (26 preceding siblings ...)
2015-01-28 0:48 ` redi at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2015-01-28 3:32 ` howarth at bromo dot med.uc.edu
2015-01-28 9:46 ` ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld.DE
28 siblings, 0 replies; 30+ messages in thread
From: howarth at bromo dot med.uc.edu @ 2015-01-28 3:32 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64368
--- Comment #29 from howarth at bromo dot med.uc.edu ---
(In reply to Jonathan Wakely from comment #28)
> Let's close this then, and I'll deal with the PRs for the remaining failures.
Down to just...
FAIL: 22_locale/conversions/string/2.cc execution test
FAIL: 23_containers/unordered_map/requirements/explicit_instantiation/2.cc
(test for excess errors)
FAIL: 23_containers/unordered_map/requirements/explicit_instantiation/4.cc
(test for excess errors)
on x86_64-apple-darwin14 at r220189.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 30+ messages in thread* [Bug target/64368] [5 Regression] Several libstdc++ test failures on non-linux platforms after r218964.
2014-12-20 15:33 [Bug target/64368] New: [5 Regression] Several libstdc++ test failures on darwin after r218964 dominiq at lps dot ens.fr
` (27 preceding siblings ...)
2015-01-28 3:32 ` howarth at bromo dot med.uc.edu
@ 2015-01-28 9:46 ` ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld.DE
28 siblings, 0 replies; 30+ messages in thread
From: ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld.DE @ 2015-01-28 9:46 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64368
--- Comment #30 from ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld.DE <ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld.DE> ---
> --- Comment #25 from Jonathan Wakely <redi at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
> Great, thanks for confirming it. As you say, let's leave this open for now in
> case HP or Rainer still sees some of these failures.
Just for the record: all the failures on Solaris (with the exception of
PR libstdc++/64797, of course) are gone, too.
Thanks.
Rainer
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 30+ messages in thread