public inbox for gcc-bugs@sourceware.org help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "redi at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org> To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug target/64368] [5 Regression] Several libstdc++ test failures on non-linux platforms after r218964. Date: Tue, 27 Jan 2015 11:13:00 -0000 [thread overview] Message-ID: <bug-64368-4-aS0miVDzBd@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/> (raw) In-Reply-To: <bug-64368-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64368 --- Comment #22 from Jonathan Wakely <redi at gcc dot gnu.org> --- (In reply to howarth from comment #20) > On x86_64-apple-darwin14, the failures are now reduced to... > > FAIL: 22_locale/conversions/string/2.cc execution test PR 64797 > FAIL: 23_containers/unordered_map/requirements/explicit_instantiation/2.cc > (test for excess errors) > FAIL: 23_containers/unordered_map/requirements/explicit_instantiation/4.cc > (test for excess errors) PR 64813 > FAIL: 30_threads/shared_lock/cons/1.cc (test for excess errors) > FAIL: 30_threads/shared_lock/cons/2.cc (test for excess errors) > FAIL: 30_threads/shared_lock/cons/3.cc (test for excess errors) > FAIL: 30_threads/shared_lock/cons/4.cc (test for excess errors) > FAIL: 30_threads/shared_lock/locking/1.cc (test for excess errors) > FAIL: 30_threads/shared_lock/locking/2.cc (test for excess errors) > FAIL: 30_threads/shared_lock/modifiers/1.cc (test for excess errors) > FAIL: 30_threads/shared_lock/modifiers/2.cc (test for excess errors) > FAIL: 30_threads/shared_lock/requirements/explicit_instantiation.cc (test > for excess errors) > FAIL: 30_threads/shared_lock/requirements/typedefs.cc (test for excess > errors) > FAIL: 30_threads/shared_timed_mutex/cons/1.cc (test for excess errors) > FAIL: 30_threads/shared_timed_mutex/requirements/standard_layout.cc (test > for excess errors) > FAIL: 30_threads/shared_timed_mutex/try_lock/1.cc (test for excess errors) > FAIL: 30_threads/shared_timed_mutex/try_lock/2.cc (test for excess errors) Fixed by r220161 > FAIL: experimental/feat-cxx14.cc (test for excess errors) Maybe also fixed by r220161 --- Comment #23 from Jonathan Wakely <redi at gcc dot gnu.org> --- Author: redi Date: Tue Jan 27 11:12:04 2015 New Revision: 220161 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=220161&root=gcc&view=rev Log: PR libstdc++/64368 * include/std/shared_mutex (shared_timed_mutex::try_lock_for, shared_timed_mutex::try_lock_until): Only define when POSIX thread timeouts option is supported. (shared_timed_mutex::try_shared_lock_for, shared_timed_mutex::try_shared_lock_until): Likewise. Modified: trunk/libstdc++-v3/ChangeLog trunk/libstdc++-v3/include/std/shared_mutex
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-01-27 11:13 UTC|newest] Thread overview: 30+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top 2014-12-20 15:33 [Bug target/64368] New: [5 Regression] Several libstdc++ test failures on darwin " dominiq at lps dot ens.fr 2014-12-20 15:37 ` [Bug target/64368] " dominiq at lps dot ens.fr 2014-12-20 15:39 ` dominiq at lps dot ens.fr 2014-12-20 15:47 ` fxcoudert at gcc dot gnu.org 2014-12-20 16:00 ` dominiq at lps dot ens.fr 2014-12-20 17:39 ` howarth at bromo dot med.uc.edu 2014-12-29 2:23 ` hp at gcc dot gnu.org 2014-12-29 2:51 ` [Bug target/64368] [5 Regression] Several libstdc++ test failures on darwin and others " hp at gcc dot gnu.org 2014-12-29 12:56 ` redi at gcc dot gnu.org 2014-12-29 14:15 ` hp at gcc dot gnu.org 2014-12-29 14:48 ` hp at gcc dot gnu.org 2015-01-09 11:20 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org 2015-01-12 7:26 ` izamyatin at gmail dot com 2015-01-21 11:13 ` ro at gcc dot gnu.org 2015-01-21 15:03 ` [Bug target/64368] [5 Regression] Several libstdc++ test failures on non-linux platforms " dominiq at lps dot ens.fr 2015-01-21 16:32 ` redi at gcc dot gnu.org 2015-01-24 20:38 ` howarth at bromo dot med.uc.edu 2015-01-26 12:33 ` redi at gcc dot gnu.org 2015-01-26 23:43 ` redi at gcc dot gnu.org 2015-01-26 23:44 ` redi at gcc dot gnu.org 2015-01-27 5:06 ` howarth at bromo dot med.uc.edu 2015-01-27 11:05 ` dominiq at lps dot ens.fr 2015-01-27 11:13 ` redi at gcc dot gnu.org [this message] 2015-01-27 12:23 ` dominiq at lps dot ens.fr 2015-01-27 13:13 ` redi at gcc dot gnu.org 2015-01-27 14:54 ` hp at gcc dot gnu.org 2015-01-27 21:11 ` andreast at gcc dot gnu.org 2015-01-28 0:48 ` redi at gcc dot gnu.org 2015-01-28 3:32 ` howarth at bromo dot med.uc.edu 2015-01-28 9:46 ` ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld.DE
Reply instructions: You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email using any one of the following methods: * Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client, and reply-to-all from there: mbox Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style * Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to switches of git-send-email(1): git send-email \ --in-reply-to=bug-64368-4-aS0miVDzBd@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ \ --to=gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org \ --cc=gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org \ /path/to/YOUR_REPLY https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html * If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header via mailto: links, try the mailto: linkBe sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox; as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).