From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-bugs-return-471853-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: (qmail 6364 invoked by alias); 29 Dec 2014 14:48:47 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 6317 invoked by uid 48); 29 Dec 2014 14:48:41 -0000
From: "hp at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug target/64368] [5 Regression] Several libstdc++ test failures on darwin and others after r218964.
Date: Mon, 29 Dec 2014 14:48:00 -0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: target
X-Bugzilla-Version: 5.0
X-Bugzilla-Keywords:
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: hp at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Status: NEW
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: ---
X-Bugzilla-Flags:
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: attachments.created
Message-ID: <bug-64368-4-z9X0gw2Yc9@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-64368-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-64368-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-SW-Source: 2014-12/txt/msg02860.txt.bz2

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64368

--- Comment #11 from Hans-Peter Nilsson <hp at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
Created attachment 34344
  --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=34344&action=edit
Call-trace for testsuite/22_locale/locale/cons/6.cc on cris-elf, a "newlib
target"

Plain execution trace from 22_locale/locale/cons/6.cc compiled with default
testsuite options, so inlining and whatever effects apply.

In the trace, lines with ">" denotes function calls, "<" are returns, with
indentation supposed to show the call-level.  The first four columns are the
hexadecimal values of the first four parameters as applicable (actually,
"parameter registers" but none are larger than 32 bits here, so same thing) /
ditto return values, padded with random contents.  (The fifth column is
cumulative execution times at each call-level.)

By a quick glance it seems the freed-but-not-allocated pointer, 0x5e23a, is
also the argument to the last call to strlen.

HTH.